<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: Terms and Conditions. PDF OK?</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/83357/Terms-and-Conditions-PDF-OK/</link>
	<description>Comments on Ask MetaFilter post Terms and Conditions. PDF OK?</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 09:03:07 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 09:03:07 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Question: Terms and Conditions. PDF OK?</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/83357/Terms-and-Conditions-PDF-OK</link>	
		<description>Terms and conditions for purchase on website - PDF ok? &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; I am in the process of setting up an extended warranty purchase online. There are certain terms and conditions currently in a PDF, with text and a couple of charts outlining warranty conditions. &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Would it be fine to link to the PDF and have a checkbox indicating the users accept the linked terms and conditions? Or do these conditions absolutely have to be in another format (HTML, text?). &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I know I can have both (it would be a hassle to convert properly), but my question is would it be fine to ONLY have the PDF?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.83357</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 09:00:27 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blue Buddha</dc:creator>
		
			<category>pdf</category>
		
			<category>terms</category>
		
			<category>conditions</category>
		
	</item> <item>
		<title>By: Solomon</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/83357/Terms-and-Conditions-PDF-OK#1234147</link>	
		<description>It would make it more awkward for people to read if they didn&apos;t have the necessary software. I&apos;d be less inclined to read the T&amp;amp;C if I had to open up another programme.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.83357-1234147</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 09:03:07 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Solomon</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: special-k</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/83357/Terms-and-Conditions-PDF-OK#1234151</link>	
		<description>You could do it like Turbotax does (when it comes to printing the return). It first warns you that a pdf is coming in the next screen. Then display said pdf in frame with accept/reject buttons below.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Another option to skip the memory pig (pdf) would be to serve the same TOS as a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.adobe.com/products/flashpaper/&quot;&gt;FlashPaper&lt;/a&gt; (there&apos;s a 30 day trial at Adobe if you just need to do this one time). You&apos;ll still display the TOS in a frame with the buttons below but everyone has flash and it wont take forever to load.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.83357-1234151</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 09:05:36 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>special-k</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: special-k</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/83357/Terms-and-Conditions-PDF-OK#1234156</link>	
		<description>PS:  an example &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.adobe.com/products/flashpaper/examples/&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; (full screen version &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.adobe.com/products/flashpaper/frontdoor_doc.swf&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Scroll down a bit. You can see how your TOS would look in that screen (can be bigger), surrounded by HTML.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.83357-1234156</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 09:09:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>special-k</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: TheOnlyCoolTim</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/83357/Terms-and-Conditions-PDF-OK#1234249</link>	
		<description>&lt;em&gt;I know I can have both (it would be a hassle to convert properly), but my question is would it be fine to ONLY have the PDF?&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
No. It&apos;s going to crash or hang people&apos;s browsers, because the Adobe browser plug-in just does that x% of the time, and then they won&apos;t want to deal with your store.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.83357-1234249</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 10:02:41 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TheOnlyCoolTim</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: OmieWise</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/83357/Terms-and-Conditions-PDF-OK#1234263</link>	
		<description>There&apos;s no reason to use a pdf other than for &lt;em&gt;your&lt;/em&gt; convenience, which means it&apos;s a bad idea in this instance.  You should put your customer&apos;s needs and ease first.  Do the conversion.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.83357-1234263</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 10:15:45 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>OmieWise</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: sero_venientibus_ossa</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/83357/Terms-and-Conditions-PDF-OK#1234401</link>	
		<description>PDF is nice for things that your customers are going to print. Otherwise stick to text/html.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.83357-1234401</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 11:45:52 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sero_venientibus_ossa</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: GIRLesq</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/83357/Terms-and-Conditions-PDF-OK#1234467</link>	
		<description>There is no legal requirement for the terms to be in HTML in order to be binding.  &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
But I agree with the other commenters that PDF is annoying.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.83357-1234467</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 12:25:03 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>GIRLesq</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: me &amp; my monkey</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/83357/Terms-and-Conditions-PDF-OK#1234614</link>	
		<description>There&apos;s no reason to use a PDF for this, unless you want to have exact control over the document after it&apos;s been downloaded (print format, etc).</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.83357-1234614</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 14:19:55 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>me &amp; my monkey</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: unless I&apos;m very much mistaken</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/83357/Terms-and-Conditions-PDF-OK#1235259</link>	
		<description>&lt;em&gt;nth&lt;/em&gt;ing the case for conversion - disability consultants I&apos;ve spoken to in the past have indicated that PDFs can be a real pain for people using screen readers, so you could also be alienating potential customers...</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.83357-1235259</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 05:34:34 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>unless I&apos;m very much mistaken</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
