Join 3,556 readers in helping fund MetaFilter (Hide)


shareable contact management solution?
January 30, 2008 11:18 AM   Subscribe

I'm looking for a shareable/collaborative Contact and Calendar Management program.

I work for a small business but we have a lot of contacts to manage. I've been using Highrise but honestly, the lack of several key features is getting to me: calendaring function,editing people/tags in batches, etc. My boss is leaning towards exchange server, I am hoping to find a better, more inclusive solution. My boss doesn't want to pay a monthly fee, but is cool with buying something on a 1 time basis. The things we need most are:

- A good contact management system with the ability to tag/group people into different categories, and the ability to add notes to people.

- A shareable calendar with tasks/meetings/whatever which can be linked back to a client.

Browser or desktop based solutions are good. An ideal solution would probably be something browser based which we could install on our own server. Pony-filter wishlist items include: ability to send bulk emails to specific groups and project management functionality with time tracking and milestones.
posted by nerdcore to Work & Money (3 answers total)
 
Have a look at Time and Chaos.
posted by bigmusic at 11:25 AM on January 30, 2008


The largest (afaik) open source project in this arena is SugarCRM, which has positioned itself as a clone of Salesforce.

Most people's experience of Sugar, however, is that it is VERY overwhelming straight out-of-the-box. It may be overkill for what you need to do, and it's geared towards Customer *Relationship* management, which means it's got feautres more oriented to sales people than you'd find in a simple contact manager. Still, you might play around with a demo to see if it'll suit you. I doubt you're going to find anything as user-friendly and pretty as highrise -- 37signals has a 'let's strip everything down to the basics and make it beautiful' philosophy* that can be rare among programmers, most of who are racing to implement as many features as possible.

* Unfortunately this philosophy means that a lot of their software is unusable for 'serious' projects without organizational 'hacks' implemented by the user. I'd love to use basecamp for project management, but it's missing a couple key features we need (or possibly that we just think we need).
posted by fishfucker at 12:31 PM on January 30, 2008


You could do this with Filemaker. I'm pretty much trying to do the same thing right now for my own personal freelancing business, and FM is amazingly powerful. The downside is that you'd probably have to hire someone to set it up (it's pretty daunting to get it going if you haven't spent some quality time with a manual or two), the upside is that you can build your dream solution and the sky's the limit with what information you can track and how you can tie it all together.

It has a web interface, server-client software, and runs on Mac/Windows. I've pretty much given up on trying to find a solution that has all the features I want which is why I'm going the roll-your-own route, everything I've looked at either doesn't run on Macs or needs some kind of 'hack' to get it to do the things I need it to like fishfucker said.
posted by bradbane at 1:45 PM on January 30, 2008


« Older What can my wife and I do to s...   |  I love Nueva CanciĆ³n. Got reso... Newer »
This thread is closed to new comments.