Social networking for research collaboration?
I've been toying with the idea of building a site to facilitate research collaboration. I'm recently out of academia, phd in computers/ math/ neuroscience. I think that doing research is very rewarding, as it is interesting, exciting, challenging, creative.... Now I am out of academia, not working in something directly involving research and am missing it. I am sure I am not alone either. The number of phds that actually get jobs with a significant research component is not high. I'm trying to figure out if thats really a problem though. It seems like someone who goes to art school to be painter is a painter whether they exhibit their work at a gallery or not. In research though, your context seems to make a difference, you're a researcher if you are active in a place of research, a context. A place offers resources and an environment to be active within. But really, the most important ingredient of a research context is people to talk to. A good collaboration can make a huge difference in research. Someone to sound ideas off of, to brain storm problems with, to share in their ideas, creativity and enthusiasm. While good collaborations are very rewarding, even within academia, building such relationships is not easy. Its not clear who has similar interests, wants to collaborate and is available to do so.
So I am toying with the idea of a way to facilitate the formation of research collaborations... and I am not sure what a good way to do this might be, which is why I am asking for your help and ideas. The target audience is people actively involved in research or with a research background that are interested in forming research relationships. Potentially, a way to do this is to form a kind of social networking site, maybe with a mefi flavor or a facebook one. With my limited brain I can only envision so much.. so I guess I have a few questions for you, but any opinions on it would be useful:
1) Is this something that would interest people?
2) What ingredients should it have to be useful?
3) What pitfalls would need to be addressed?
4) What information would people want to put up and not put up?
5) How do you keep it open while keeping it relevant and free from unwanted solicitations?
6) What kinds of collaboration structures (online or otherwise) could it facilitate?
Maybe like arXiv + a wiki or something like that? I could see it becoming a magnet for physics crackpots at worst, but also really valuable for people who rely on nothing more than email for research relationships.
Keep me/us posted.
posted by virga at 8:29 AM on January 29, 2008