Comments on: How can I get an "average" of several images?

Question: How can I get an "average" of several images?

k7lim — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 10:57:24 -0800

How can I generate a "visual average" from a group of digital images?

A few years ago, I saw a BoingBoing post in which a guy had taken the pixel means of Playboy centerfolds for several decades. I'd like to use the same technique and am wondering if there's any off-the-shelf (preferably free) stuff that can do that.

By: Wolfdog

Wolfdog — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 11:20:17 -0800

It's a one-step job with ImageMagick. Say you have a bunch of .png files in a directory.

convert -average *.png output.png

and you're done. The source files do need to be cropped so they're all the same size first.

By: god hates math

god hates math — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 11:24:06 -0800

This is fairly common (if not standard procedure) in Astrophotography. It's easily done in photoshop, and I imagine that it could be done in The Gimp as well.

For basic averaging, the first image remains as-is. The second image is layered on top, with an opacity of 50%. The third image gets an opacity of 33%. Continue for n images, giving each image an opacity of 1/x, where x= the position of the image in the stack.

I also noticed Salavon's work, and I tried to replicate it with a large stack of one type of image. I had about 20 layers, and it didn't look so hot - you might want to start out with more than that.

I imagine that it also wouldn't be that hard to write a script that analyzes the value of each pixel of all your images, and averages, and then writes the file, but I don't know that much about the individual image formats. I do remember there being linux-based command line software out there for Astrophotography image stacking, but I could never get it to work. If the photoshop/gimp route doesn't work for you, some googleing of "Astrophotography image stacking" should do you good.

On preview - Oh damn! Imagemagick. That would certainly do the trick, as long as they're all the same size. Having dealt with Imagemagick, though, I'd say that the photoshop/gimp process would be a bit more user-friendly.

By: StickyCarpet

StickyCarpet — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 12:10:38 -0800

If you want to do it by hand in photoshop, simply combine the first 2 at %50. Add the 3rd image at %33 percent, to that add the 4th at %25 and so on, adding the next picture as a percentage of 1/(the number of pictures used so far)

By: StickyCarpet

StickyCarpet — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 12:18:16 -0800

um, or what that other guy said. But while I'm here again lets note that if you have 8 bit image components and, say 500 pictures, those last ones will round off to zero impact. So the best thing would add them all into a floating point of deeper bit representation, then average down in one shot.

By: uandt

uandt — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 14:29:13 -0800

This fpp a few years back about a guy combining flickr images links to code that does this as well