Alternatives to vet's recommended (expensive) treatment for puppy?
January 16, 2008 12:40 PM
Subscribe
Puppy has developed bald patches on head and face. Antibiotics prescribed by vet a month ago haven't helped. Should the puppy's owner have a very expensive biopsy done, or just leave it alone and hope it goes away?
This is my friend's 5-month-old, mixed-breed puppy. I told her I would ask this for her because she's really unsure whether to go ahead with the procedure, considering that it costs several hundred dollars and she doesn't have a lot of money. However, she does want to be a good pet owner and make sure her puppy gets the treatment he needs.
The spots haven't worsened in the last month, but they haven't gotten any better as a result of the antibiotics. They don't seem to hurt, and he isn't displaying any other unusual symptoms. His disposition (hyper and typically puppy-like) is the same as always.
If anybody has any suggestions as to what else she can try or what might be causing the bald patches, please share. Her veterinarian's advice is, of course, to go forward with the biopsy - and she will if that's the only/best option. Feedback will be greatly appreciated.
posted by Ruby Doomsday to pets & animals (19 comments total)
posted by chickaboo at 12:57 PM on January 16, 2008