<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: "Symantec Auto-Protect is Disabled" -- But It Isn't.  So, Huh?</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/8056/Symantec-AutoProtect-is-Disabled-But-It-Isnt-So-Huh/</link>
	<description>Comments on Ask MetaFilter post "Symantec Auto-Protect is Disabled" -- But It Isn't.  So, Huh?</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2004 11:29:16 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2004 11:29:16 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Question: &quot;Symantec Auto-Protect is Disabled&quot; -- But It Isn&apos;t.  So, Huh?</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/8056/Symantec-AutoProtect-is-Disabled-But-It-Isnt-So-Huh</link>	
		<description>My parents were getting tired of the clutter on their computer, so I reformatted the hard drive for them and installed Windows XP and (among other things) Symantec AntiVirus 9. Seemingly randomly, and fairly often, they now get a yellow pop-up warning that &quot;Symantec auto-protect is disabled&quot; - even though auto-protect is enabled in preferences and shows up in the system tray. I have a laptop with SAV9 on WinXP, and it doesn&apos;t do this. What&apos;s going on? &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://david.medovoy.com/compost/symantec.gif&quot;&gt;A screenshot&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:ask.metafilter.com,2004:site.8056</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2004 10:37:22 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kickingtheground</dc:creator>
		
			<category>windowsxp</category>
		
			<category>windows</category>
		
			<category>symantec</category>
		
			<category>antivirus</category>
		
	</item> <item>
		<title>By: quiet</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/8056/Symantec-AutoProtect-is-Disabled-But-It-Isnt-So-Huh#157890</link>	
		<description>Have you tried this?&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://service1.symantec.com/SUPPORT/nav.nsf/docid/2002101608291506&quot;&gt;http://service1.symantec.com/SUPPORT/nav.nsf/docid/2002101608291506&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2004:site.8056-157890</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2004 11:29:16 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>quiet</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: kickingtheground</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/8056/Symantec-AutoProtect-is-Disabled-But-It-Isnt-So-Huh#157905</link>	
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;q&gt;&lt;em&gt;Have you tried this?&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/q&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;No, doesn&apos;t seem to be any of those (well, except for the uninstall/reinstall suggestion, which I&apos;d rather avoid).&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
From the linked page: &lt;q&gt;&lt;em&gt;A red X is superimposed over the Norton AntiVirus Auto-Protect icon in the system tray.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/q&gt;&lt;br&gt;
This happens if I manually disable autoprotect, but otherwise does not happen, even when I get the warnings.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2004:site.8056-157905</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2004 12:17:13 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kickingtheground</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: ALongDecember</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/8056/Symantec-AutoProtect-is-Disabled-But-It-Isnt-So-Huh#158020</link>	
		<description>Hate to scare you, but the way that message is written almost looks fake. The generic windows text just looks fishy. Not saying you faked it, but maybe a third party program is creating it? Just a thought, make sure you run &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lavasoftusa.com/&quot;&gt;Ad-aware&lt;/a&gt; if you already don&apos;t.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2004:site.8056-158020</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2004 20:47:31 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ALongDecember</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: bob sarabia</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/8056/Symantec-AutoProtect-is-Disabled-But-It-Isnt-So-Huh#158031</link>	
		<description>hmmm, nah i&apos;m not thinking spyware. he said it was a clean install so i dont see any room for fakery. Actually, I just had a similar problem tonight with norton system works....actually, the exact same problem. Not withstanding the fact that it&apos;s a different program, you need to go for the install/reinstall, as it did the trick for me.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2004:site.8056-158031</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2004 21:23:40 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bob sarabia</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: bingo</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/8056/Symantec-AutoProtect-is-Disabled-But-It-Isnt-So-Huh#158142</link>	
		<description>I&apos;m not trying to troll, but seriously, it&apos;s weird to me that your solution to a cluttered hard drive was installing windows XP and symantec. Those two items are the &lt;em&gt;reason&lt;/em&gt; for clutter in many cases.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2004:site.8056-158142</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jun 2004 11:48:09 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bingo</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: bob sarabia</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/8056/Symantec-AutoProtect-is-Disabled-But-It-Isnt-So-Huh#158148</link>	
		<description>I believe he meant &quot;clutter&quot; in the sense of too many apps and files all over the place, not the actual fragmentation of info. I doubt his parents would be getting tired of the data arrangement of their computer.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2004:site.8056-158148</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jun 2004 11:56:19 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bob sarabia</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: Blue Stone</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/8056/Symantec-AutoProtect-is-Disabled-But-It-Isnt-So-Huh#158150</link>	
		<description>The only time I had an issue like this was a few months after I installed a piece of software of &apos;good repute but dubious origin&apos; ... ok ... warez. After that the antivirus auto-protect would refuse to work as the pernicious software sought a way to report back to it&apos;s evil creator.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
If everything you&apos;re using is of high integrity, I have no idea.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2004:site.8056-158150</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jun 2004 12:06:52 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blue Stone</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: kickingtheground</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/8056/Symantec-AutoProtect-is-Disabled-But-It-Isnt-So-Huh#158193</link>	
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I&apos;m not trying to troll, but seriously, it&apos;s weird to me that your solution to a cluttered hard drive was installing windows XP and symantec.&lt;/blockquote&gt;There were lots of old useless application files scattered all over the place, a hard drive so fragmented that running windows defragmenter had little/no effect, all sorts of nasty spyware my little sister had accidently installed that was difficult to fully clean off, and (worst of all) the dreaded Win2k/services.exe bug was often badly slowing things down.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;Not withstanding the fact that it&apos;s a different program, you need to go for the install/reinstall, as it did the trick for me.&lt;/blockquote&gt;Tried that yesterday, I&apos;ve gotten the message at least once since then.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2004:site.8056-158193</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jun 2004 14:08:51 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kickingtheground</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
