<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: Tell me about Internet-connected Wireless Weather Cameras?</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/80453/Tell-me-about-Internetconnected-Wireless-Weather-Cameras/</link>
	<description>Comments on Ask MetaFilter post Tell me about Internet-connected Wireless Weather Cameras?</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 22:58:28 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 22:58:28 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Question: Tell me about Internet-connected Wireless Weather Cameras?</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/80453/Tell-me-about-Internetconnected-Wireless-Weather-Cameras</link>	
		<description>I&apos;d like a cheap Weather cam connected to the net, but without a computer attached.  I&apos;m looking at wireless web cams.  Is this the best approach?  Are there other devices which might help? &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; My parents have a holiday property with a great view, and often dodgy power supply.  They have an existing broadband connection to the house, with a wireless router attached.  The modem &amp;amp; router are connected to a surge protector and will eventually reconnect by themselves if the building power is restored.  It&apos;s not ok to leave the computer up and running all the time.  They&apos;re not always there, so there&apos;s really no one to intervene if anything fails.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I&apos;d like to setup a webcam which can periodically upload a picture to a site, or at least be be web accessible somehow.  They could use this to check the weather out the window of the house (visual checks only i guess), so they can decide if a trip to the beach is worthwhile.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I&apos;ve seen the home security setups which take photos based on motion, and a few like &lt;a href=&quot;http://ask.metafilter.com/68429/Webcam-for-weathercams&quot;&gt;this&lt;/a&gt; on amazon.  &lt;strong&gt;Before I grab something, am I going about this the right way or is there a simpler solution I&apos;ve overlooked?  &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I&apos;ve searched for how other weather cams are run, but they seem a tad more complex and robust than my solution ever need be.  Also, a lot of them involve more infrastructure that I&apos;d like to connect to this sort of unreliable power.  Is there any other device that could help me out with temperature etc also?&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Yep, I&apos;ve seen &lt;a href=&quot;http://ask.metafilter.com/68429/Webcam-for-weathercams&quot;&gt;this&lt;/a&gt;, but it was a different goal (security).</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.80453</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 22:46:39 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kaydo</dc:creator>
		
			<category>camera</category>
		
			<category>wireless</category>
		
			<category>webcam</category>
		
			<category>weather</category>
		
	</item> <item>
		<title>By: Steven C. Den Beste</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/80453/Tell-me-about-Internetconnected-Wireless-Weather-Cameras#1193185</link>	
		<description>In essence, you&apos;re asking for a camera that knows how to talk TCP/IP. Isn&apos;t that right? That seems unlikely.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.80453-1193185</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 22:58:28 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steven C. Den Beste</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: kaydo</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/80453/Tell-me-about-Internetconnected-Wireless-Weather-Cameras#1193189</link>	
		<description>Well maybe, but I&apos;m wondering if my approach is the most sensible one or if there&apos;s a better solution.  The camera I linked to on Amazon has that capability anyway.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.80453-1193189</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 23:08:18 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kaydo</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: Symeon</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/80453/Tell-me-about-Internetconnected-Wireless-Weather-Cameras#1193200</link>	
		<description>Not so unlikely, Steven.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
kaydo, take a look at &lt;a href=&quot;http://axis.com&quot;&gt;axis.com&lt;/a&gt; .  I&apos;ve used a couple of their standalone network cameras (the old 2100 and newer 207W models) for precisely the purpose you describe:  visually checking the weather at a remote location.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I used the old 2100 to periodically upload a still image to a remote server via ftp, while the 207W is currently acting as a standalone webserver -- offering live, streaming video (and connecting over the wireless network at that).  Axis also offers a free dynamic DNS service, so you can just point your browser to xxxxxx.axiscam.net and be redirected to the camera&apos;s current IP, then accessing its built-in webserver&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
There might a more sensible approach, kaydo, but after a little bit of research, the Axis cameras met our needs and have been performing admirably.  From what I read, I&apos;d also be careful of the cheap 3com/dlink net-cameras -- I haven&apos;t used one myself, but I&apos;ve heard some horror stories.  Each of the Axis cams were in the $200-300, but they&apos;ve been worth every penny.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
A caveat for these types of cameras, though -- without the additional auto-iris, true outdoor-facing, high-light settings may degrade picture quality.  I was able to get away with not getting an auto-iris, but you shouldn&apos;t be expecting indoor-quality shots in the &amp;lt;$800 range.  In any event, even without the auto-iris, the picture quality has been more than sufficient for checking the weather out a window.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.80453-1193200</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 23:22:24 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Symeon</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: pompomtom</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/80453/Tell-me-about-Internetconnected-Wireless-Weather-Cameras#1193210</link>	
		<description>I have a Swann &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.swann.com.au/s/products/view/?product=433&quot;&gt;Max-IP-cam&lt;/a&gt;, which has ethernet and runs a little webserver which streams things. It&apos;ll happily plug into the router sans pc. The problem is that the page it serves is all Activex-ey, so it only seems to work on IE on windows. Other than that it can ftp-client to something else and upload stills. Check that first, because it sucks.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.80453-1193210</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 23:45:26 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>pompomtom</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: kaydo</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/80453/Tell-me-about-Internetconnected-Wireless-Weather-Cameras#1193247</link>	
		<description>Thanks folks, you guys rule</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.80453-1193247</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 01:24:38 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kaydo</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: yellowbkpk</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/80453/Tell-me-about-Internetconnected-Wireless-Weather-Cameras#1194626</link>	
		<description>Can I hijack the question a little and ask if anyone knows about high-res digital cameras that take &amp;gt; 5MP still images and auto-upload them somewhere?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.80453-1194626</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 21:28:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>yellowbkpk</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
