<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: BSODude, This Fucking Sucks</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/78102/BSODude-This-Fucking-Sucks/</link>
	<description>Comments on Ask MetaFilter post BSODude, This Fucking Sucks</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 17:14:11 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 17:14:11 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Question: BSODude, This Fucking Sucks</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/78102/BSODude-This-Fucking-Sucks</link>	
		<description>BSOD Filter: Help me pinpoint the cause. Dump file contents included. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; Purchased about 2 months ago, it is still under warranty, but I would like to know exactly what I am looking at before sending it in or asking for replacement parts.  From what I can tell, it is bad memory I guess.  Is there a way to tell which stick it is?  Any software recommendations for testing the memory?  Is it possible that it is off the video card memory?  If it is the DDR2, should I just replace it with better memory?&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Here is some information on the rig, further below is the dump...&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Intel Core 2 Quad Processor Q6600 (4x 2.4GHz/8MB L2 Cache/1066FSB)&lt;br&gt;
Asus P5N-E SLI nForce&#174; 650i SLI Chipset w/6-channel CODEC, Gb LAN, S-ATA Raid, USB 2.0, IEEE-1394 Dual PCI-E MB&lt;br&gt;
2GB Corsair XMS2&lt;br&gt;
NVIDIA GeForce 8600GT 512MB w/DVI + TV Out Video&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Microsoft (R) Windows Debugger Version 6.8.0004.0 X86&lt;br&gt;
Copyright (c) Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Loading Dump File [C:\Documents and Settings\Bleeping PC\Desktop\Mini120607-01.dmp]&lt;br&gt;
wMini Kernel Dump File: Only registers and stack trace are available&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Symbol search path is: C:\WINDOWS\Symbols&lt;br&gt;
Executable search path is: &lt;br&gt;
Unable to load image ntoskrnl.exe, Win32 error 0n2&lt;br&gt;
*** WARNING: Unable to verify timestamp for ntoskrnl.exe&lt;br&gt;
Windows XP Kernel Version 2600 (Service Pack 2) MP (4 procs) Free x86 compatible&lt;br&gt;
Product: WinNt, suite: TerminalServer SingleUserTS&lt;br&gt;
Kernel base = 0x804d7000 PsLoadedModuleList = 0x8055c720&lt;br&gt;
Debug session time: Thu Dec  6 08:33:14.906 2007 (GMT-7)&lt;br&gt;
System Uptime: 0 days 12:38:18.528&lt;br&gt;
Unable to load image ntoskrnl.exe, Win32 error 0n2&lt;br&gt;
*** WARNING: Unable to verify timestamp for ntoskrnl.exe&lt;br&gt;
Loading Kernel Symbols&lt;br&gt;
.............................................................................................................................&lt;br&gt;
Loading User Symbols&lt;br&gt;
Loading unloaded module list&lt;br&gt;
....................&lt;br&gt;
*** WARNING: Unable to verify timestamp for hal.dll&lt;br&gt;
*******************************************************************************&lt;br&gt;
*                                                                             *&lt;br&gt;
*                        Bugcheck Analysis                                    *&lt;br&gt;
*                                                                             *&lt;br&gt;
*******************************************************************************&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Use !analyze -v to get detailed debugging information.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
BugCheck 9C, {0, bab3c050, b2000040, 800}&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Probably caused by : memory_corruption ( nt!MmDeleteKernelStack+156 )&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Followup: MachineOwner&lt;br&gt;
---------&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
1: kd&amp;gt; !analyze -v&lt;br&gt;
*******************************************************************************&lt;br&gt;
*                                                                             *&lt;br&gt;
*                        Bugcheck Analysis                                    *&lt;br&gt;
*                                                                             *&lt;br&gt;
*******************************************************************************&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
MACHINE_CHECK_EXCEPTION (9c)&lt;br&gt;
A fatal Machine Check Exception has occurred.&lt;br&gt;
KeBugCheckEx parameters;&lt;br&gt;
    x86 Processors&lt;br&gt;
        If the processor has ONLY MCE feature available (For example Intel&lt;br&gt;
        Pentium), the parameters are:&lt;br&gt;
        1 - Low  32 bits of P5_MC_TYPE MSR&lt;br&gt;
        2 - Address of MCA_EXCEPTION structure&lt;br&gt;
        3 - High 32 bits of P5_MC_ADDR MSR&lt;br&gt;
        4 - Low  32 bits of P5_MC_ADDR MSR&lt;br&gt;
        If the processor also has MCA feature available (For example Intel&lt;br&gt;
        Pentium Pro), the parameters are:&lt;br&gt;
        1 - Bank number&lt;br&gt;
        2 - Address of MCA_EXCEPTION structure&lt;br&gt;
        3 - High 32 bits of MCi_STATUS MSR for the MCA bank that had the error&lt;br&gt;
        4 - Low  32 bits of MCi_STATUS MSR for the MCA bank that had the error&lt;br&gt;
    IA64 Processors&lt;br&gt;
        1 - Bugcheck Type&lt;br&gt;
            1 - MCA_ASSERT&lt;br&gt;
            2 - MCA_GET_STATEINFO&lt;br&gt;
                SAL returned an error for SAL_GET_STATEINFO while processing MCA.&lt;br&gt;
            3 - MCA_CLEAR_STATEINFO&lt;br&gt;
                SAL returned an error for SAL_CLEAR_STATEINFO while processing MCA.&lt;br&gt;
            4 - MCA_FATAL&lt;br&gt;
                FW reported a fatal MCA.&lt;br&gt;
            5 - MCA_NONFATAL&lt;br&gt;
                SAL reported a recoverable MCA and we don&apos;t support currently&lt;br&gt;
                support recovery or SAL generated an MCA and then couldn&apos;t&lt;br&gt;
                produce an error record.&lt;br&gt;
            0xB - INIT_ASSERT&lt;br&gt;
            0xC - INIT_GET_STATEINFO&lt;br&gt;
                  SAL returned an error for SAL_GET_STATEINFO while processing INIT event.&lt;br&gt;
            0xD - INIT_CLEAR_STATEINFO&lt;br&gt;
                  SAL returned an error for SAL_CLEAR_STATEINFO while processing INIT event.&lt;br&gt;
            0xE - INIT_FATAL&lt;br&gt;
                  Not used.&lt;br&gt;
        2 - Address of log&lt;br&gt;
        3 - Size of log&lt;br&gt;
        4 - Error code in the case of x_GET_STATEINFO or x_CLEAR_STATEINFO&lt;br&gt;
    AMD64 Processors&lt;br&gt;
        1 - Bank number&lt;br&gt;
        2 - Address of MCA_EXCEPTION structure&lt;br&gt;
        3 - High 32 bits of MCi_STATUS MSR for the MCA bank that had the error&lt;br&gt;
        4 - Low  32 bits of MCi_STATUS MSR for the MCA bank that had the error&lt;br&gt;
Arguments:&lt;br&gt;
Arg1: 00000000&lt;br&gt;
Arg2: bab3c050&lt;br&gt;
Arg3: b2000040&lt;br&gt;
Arg4: 00000800&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Debugging Details:&lt;br&gt;
------------------&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
   NOTE:  This is a hardware error.  This error was reported by the CPU&lt;br&gt;
   via Interrupt 18.  This analysis will provide more information about&lt;br&gt;
   the specific error.  Please contact the manufacturer for additional&lt;br&gt;
   information about this error and troubleshooting assistance.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
   This error is documented in the following publication:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
      - IA-32 Intel(r) Architecture Software Developer&apos;s Manual &lt;br&gt;
        Volume 3: System Programming Guide&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
   Bit Mask:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
       MA                           Model Specific       MCA&lt;br&gt;
    O  ID      Other Information      Error Code     Error Code&lt;br&gt;
   VV  SDP ___________|____________ _______|_______ _______|______&lt;br&gt;
   AEUECRC|                        |               |              |&lt;br&gt;
   LRCNVVC|                        |               |              |&lt;br&gt;
   ^^^^^^^|                        |               |              |&lt;br&gt;
      6         5         4         3         2         1&lt;br&gt;
   3210987654321098765432109876543210987654321098765432109876543210&lt;br&gt;
   ----------------------------------------------------------------&lt;br&gt;
   1011001000000000000000000100000000000000000000000000100000000000&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
VAL   - MCi_STATUS register is valid&lt;br&gt;
        Indicates that the information contained within the IA32_MCi_STATUS&lt;br&gt;
        register is valid.  When this flag is set, the processor follows the&lt;br&gt;
        rules given for the OVER flag in the IA32_MCi_STATUS register when&lt;br&gt;
        overwriting previously valid entries.  The processor sets the VAL &lt;br&gt;
        flag and software is responsible for clearing it.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
UC    - Error Uncorrected&lt;br&gt;
        Indicates that the processor did not or was not able to correct the &lt;br&gt;
        error condition.  When clear, this flag indicates that the processor&lt;br&gt;
        was able to correct the error condition.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
EN    - Error Enabled&lt;br&gt;
        Indicates that the error was enabled by the associated EEj bit of the&lt;br&gt;
        IA32_MCi_CTL register.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
PCC   - Processor Context Corrupt&lt;br&gt;
        Indicates that the state of the processor might have been corrupted&lt;br&gt;
        by the error condition detected and that reliable restarting of the&lt;br&gt;
        processor may not be possible.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
BUSCONNERR - Bus and Interconnect Error   BUS{LL}_{PP}_{RRRR}_{II}_{T}_err&lt;br&gt;
        These errors match the format 0000 1PPT RRRR IILL&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
   Concatenated Error Code:&lt;br&gt;
   --------------------------&lt;br&gt;
   _VAL_UC_EN_PCC_BUSCONNERR_0&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
   This error code can be reported back to the manufacturer.&lt;br&gt;
   They may be able to provide additional information based upon&lt;br&gt;
   this error.  All questions regarding STOP 0x9C should be&lt;br&gt;
   directed to the hardware manufacturer.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
BUGCHECK_STR:  0x9C_GenuineIntel&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
CUSTOMER_CRASH_COUNT:  1&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
DEFAULT_BUCKET_ID:  INTEL_CPU_MICROCODE_ZERO&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
PROCESS_NAME:  Idle&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
LAST_CONTROL_TRANSFER:  from 806e7bf7 to 804f9f05&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
STACK_TEXT:  &lt;br&gt;
bab3c028 806e7bf7 0000009c 00000000 bab3c050 nt!MmDeleteKernelStack+0x156&lt;br&gt;
bab3c154 806e2c52 bab38d70 00000000 00000000 hal!_allshr+0x9&lt;br&gt;
00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 hal!HalpWriteCmosTime+0xce&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
STACK_COMMAND:  kb&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
FOLLOWUP_IP: &lt;br&gt;
nt!MmDeleteKernelStack+156&lt;br&gt;
804f9f05 5d              pop     ebp&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
SYMBOL_STACK_INDEX:  0&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
SYMBOL_NAME:  nt!MmDeleteKernelStack+156&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
FOLLOWUP_NAME:  MachineOwner&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
MODULE_NAME: nt&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
DEBUG_FLR_IMAGE_TIMESTAMP:  469f3fa8&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
IMAGE_NAME:  memory_corruption&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
FAILURE_BUCKET_ID:  0x9C_GenuineIntel_nt!MmDeleteKernelStack+156&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
BUCKET_ID:  0x9C_GenuineIntel_nt!MmDeleteKernelStack+156&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Followup: MachineOwner&lt;br&gt;
---------</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:ask.metafilter.com,2007:site.78102</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 17:02:23 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>B(oYo)BIES</dc:creator>
		
			<category>BSOD</category>
		
			<category>troubleshooting</category>
		
			<category>pc</category>
		
			<category>computer</category>
		
			<category>technical</category>
		
	</item> <item>
		<title>By: CrayDrygu</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/78102/BSODude-This-Fucking-Sucks#1159997</link>	
		<description>&lt;i&gt;&quot;Any software recommendations for testing the memory?&quot;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
The gold standard for this is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.memtest.org/&quot;&gt;Memtest86+&lt;/a&gt;.  Click on &quot;Download (Pre-Built &amp;amp; ISOs)&quot;, then download &quot;Pre-Compiled Bootable ISO (.zip)&quot;.  Burn a CD of that image, boot from the image, and let it run its tests for a while.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
If your memory is catastrophically bad, you&apos;ll see red warnings right away.  On the other hand, sometimes it can run for 12 hours or more before finding the defect.  Give it time.  You can see in the top-right how many times it&apos;s run its battery of tests, let it go through at least a couple (may take a couple hours).</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2007:site.78102-1159997</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 17:14:11 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>CrayDrygu</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: paulsc</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/78102/BSODude-This-Fucking-Sucks#1160026</link>	
		<description>Before you waste a lot of hours running memtest86+, do open the box, and make sure the memory DIMMs are fully seated. It&apos;s a good utility, but it expects things to be fully seated :-)</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2007:site.78102-1160026</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 17:47:06 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>paulsc</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: jjj606</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/78102/BSODude-This-Fucking-Sucks#1160098</link>	
		<description>Yes, memtest86 is really easy to use.  One other idea: check that all the fans are working.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2007:site.78102-1160098</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 18:53:04 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jjj606</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: flabdablet</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/78102/BSODude-This-Fucking-Sucks#1160401</link>	
		<description>You might also care to pull the DIMMs and check the gold edge connectors under a good strong light.  Doofus installers sometimes handle these with bare fingers, which leaves a noticeably discolored fingerprint on the edge connector after a month or two.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
If you see a fingerprint on the edge connector, you can clean it up with a white pencil eraser (don&apos;t use an ink eraser - too abrasive).  Do this after discharging yourself to the chassis, don&apos;t wear synthetic clothing while doing it, and make sure you blow all the rubber crumbs off before reseating the DIMM.  This is an Apple II-era trick that still works well.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
If Memtest86+ runs overnight and finds no errors, your RAM is most likely fine.  If not, it won&apos;t tell you explicitly which DIMM is bad. If you find an error, repeat the test with one DIMM installed at a time.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2007:site.78102-1160401</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2007 04:07:55 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>flabdablet</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: deadmessenger</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/78102/BSODude-This-Fucking-Sucks#1160594</link>	
		<description>One bit of advice I would give here:   If you&apos;re going to run memtest86+, I would shut down your machine overnight and let it completely cool first.  Then, power it on with the memtest boot CD in the morning, say before you go to work.    The reason for this is that I have seen hardware problems that only show up when the machine is either cold or fully warmed up.  In this scenario, you&apos;d get to test both cases.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2007:site.78102-1160594</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2007 10:24:43 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>deadmessenger</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: Mr. Gunn</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/78102/BSODude-This-Fucking-Sucks#1160699</link>	
		<description>Tech people usually recommend removing all but one stick, and then booting and running memtest, then repeating with the other sticks, to narrow down the problem.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2007:site.78102-1160699</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2007 13:23:50 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mr. Gunn</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
