Is it possible that sulfa residue in food is causing my daily asthma/allergy symptoms? In a nutshell: extremely allergic to sulfa antibiotics, moved to US about 11 years ago after being raised eating mainly food grown nearby or by neighbors, began having asthma/chronic cough issues shortly thereafter. Batteries of allergy tests have never been able to ID the trigger. Recently realized that sulfa is one of antibiotics that farmers here feed livestock as if it were some kind of candy.
First of all, for the purpose of disambiguation, sulfa antibiotics ≠ sulfur. Also, I know you are not a doctor and that even if you are, you are not giving me medical advice, I have lots of my own doctors that I see all the time, and I am undergoing standard treatment protocols (Singulair, Advair) and am under the care of a pulmonary specialist.
I found out I was allergic to sulfa antibiotics around the age of 13, when I went into anaphylactic shock after taking a standard dosage; since then, I have been avoiding them, which I imagined was an easy thing to do. Turns out that might not be so easy to do in the US. Shortly after moving here at the age of 18, I began having trouble with chronic, year-around asthma and allergies, primarily in the form of cough-variant asthma.
Outside of my sulfa allergy, I have not encountered many allergy problems. Pollen, dander, and the other usual suspects make me sneezy and watery-eyed, but they don't cause asthma attacks. I've had allergy skin tests and never reacted to anything besides the control test. I'm not one of your "I'm allergic to EVERYTHING" people, I guess I'm trying to say.
My diet includes meat and dairy; when I cook at home, I use organics, hormone- and antibiotic-free foods. Unfortunately, I eat out a lot, so most of the food I consume has potentially more dubious origins. Beef is something I rarely cook at home, but which I do eat a couple times a week in the form of hamburgers at local hotspots. The milk and dairy products I consume at home are never a problem, but those same things eaten in restaurants sometimes do cause reactions.
Due to some writing I have been doing about the beef industry, I found out that the feedlot for the beef I most frequently consume has had a run-in with the FDA over unacceptable levels of Albon® S.R. (sulfadimethoxine) in their beef. Cue freak out! This was the first time it occurred to me that I might in fact be getting pretty regular, low doses of sulfa.
I've never tied my asthma attacks to anything specific, beyond the fact that sometimes dairy makes me cough, and over the past few years my internal explanatory narrative has more and more resembled
this. It has been pretty rough, I must say, with effects including two hernias from the horrible coughing.
To wrap this up, I had a burger with a friend last night, and wham, huge asthma attack a few hours later. I'm not trying to do the whole after-and-therefore-caused-by argument, but it seems at least possible that there is a connection.
Tangentially relevant articles I have found online include
this alert regarding dangerous levels of sulfa in a Canadian honey a while back,
this article on antibiotic levels in milk, and
these lecture notes, which claim that there have been no cases of reactions to sulfonomide residue in food. The latter articles seem to challenge the idea that harmful levels of sulfa may actually be in our food.
So, my questions for the hive mind:
1. Has anyone else tied consumption of sulfa residue to allergic problems, especially asthma? If so, what has helped? How about any of the other antibiotics that the FDA is ok with allowing in our food and to which many people are allergic: i.e., penicillin, tetracycline, etc. (Anecdotal and researched findings are equally welcome.)
2. Are there foods beyond meat (including poultry), eggs, and dairy products that might contain traces of sulfa residue? I'm going to try to eliminate the foods I mentioned from my diet for a while and see if that helps the asthma.
Thanks for any suggestions.
http://www.ens-newswire.com/ens/jul2007/2007-07-12-01.asp
There are some controversy with that particular study implying that it was a problem particular to organics (conventional cropping uses manure + other stuff, while organics typically use just manure, but they aren't allowed to use the raw manure used in this study). But it does drive home the fact that organic farms would be better off if they used manure from organic animals.
Your problem is interesting and there are probably other with the same problem who don't even know it. Antibiotics in the food system are huge problem. I had antibiotic resistant salmonella and it tore my stomach apart before they caught it. These things are hard to trace...hard to lay specific blame on, especially since plants are now being contaminated along with the usual suspects like ground meat and raw eggs.
I'd try to either eat organics low on the food chain or start buying local from producers you know. I emphasize really knowing those producers, because not all local small producers are dedicated to antibiotic-free agriculture.
posted by melissam at 12:22 PM on December 5, 2007