<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: Parts Per Hundred or Parts Per One?</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/76738/Parts-Per-Hundred-or-Parts-Per-One/</link>
	<description>Comments on Ask MetaFilter post Parts Per Hundred or Parts Per One?</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 15:21:34 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 15:21:34 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Question: Parts Per Hundred or Parts Per One?</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/76738/Parts-Per-Hundred-or-Parts-Per-One</link>	
		<description>What is the TERM for the three-decimal place, fraction-of-one &quot;percentage&quot; format used in baseball statistics? &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; Baseball &quot;percentages&quot; such as batting average, OPS, and even winning percentage are never expressed in regular percentages like 95% or 30%. Baseball people will refer to &quot;percentages&quot; of .950 (&quot;nine-fifty&quot;) or .300 for those numbers. &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Heck, OBP is &quot;on base percentage&quot;, but also expressed as something like .449... and a hundred percent is written 1.000 but called &quot;one thousand.&quot;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
This seems to me to be a mangling of what &quot;percent&quot; means, which I think means parts per hundred, not parts per one.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Is there a concise but mathematically accurate term for this kind of expression? Calling it a &quot;three decimal place, baseball-style percentage&quot; or &quot;a fraction of one to three decimals of accuracy, with padded zeros added when necessary&quot; is quite the choice of mouthful.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Yes, I realize this is a heck of a waste of a MeFi question, but it&apos;s infected my brain now and Google&apos;s been little help.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:ask.metafilter.com,2007:site.76738</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 15:12:01 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rokusan</dc:creator>
		
			<category>baseball</category>
		
			<category>statistics</category>
		
			<category>percentage</category>
		
			<category>math</category>
		
	</item> <item>
		<title>By: not_on_display</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/76738/Parts-Per-Hundred-or-Parts-Per-One#1140127</link>	
		<description>My lazy butt wants to say &quot;significant to three decimal places,&quot; but I&apos;ve never heard that used in reference to baseball stats, sporting win/loss ratios, etc.  I haven&apos;t a  &lt;em&gt;permilliage?&lt;/em&gt; of a clue.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2007:site.76738-1140127</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 15:21:34 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>not_on_display</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: pombe</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/76738/Parts-Per-Hundred-or-Parts-Per-One#1140134</link>	
		<description>Per mil is the percent equivalent for writing parts-per-thousand.  It even has its own symbol - &#8240;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
This is not quite what the baseball stats are using, but it is related.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
FWIW, I&apos;m pretty comfortable with expressing percentages as decimals. 0.028 = 2.8% = 28&#8240;.  Most scientists I know seem to use the two interchangably.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2007:site.76738-1140134</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 15:27:44 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>pombe</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: proj</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/76738/Parts-Per-Hundred-or-Parts-Per-One#1140136</link>	
		<description>I don&apos;t have a huge problem with what you&apos;re saying as I see it as basically correct but I do have a problem when I see &quot;9.1&quot; to mean 9 and 1/3 innings or &quot;9.2&quot; to mean 9 and 2/3 innings.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2007:site.76738-1140136</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 15:30:12 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>proj</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: smackfu</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/76738/Parts-Per-Hundred-or-Parts-Per-One#1140207</link>	
		<description>Slugging &quot;percentage&quot; is a much worse mangling.  It&apos;s a percentage that maxes out at 4.0!</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2007:site.76738-1140207</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 16:11:11 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>smackfu</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: rokusan</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/76738/Parts-Per-Hundred-or-Parts-Per-One#1140246</link>	
		<description>Pomble, are you suggesting &quot;decimal percentage?&quot;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Smackfu, good point. Better example than OBP.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Still no good solution, though. At least I feel less stupid.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2007:site.76738-1140246</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 16:38:09 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rokusan</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: Cool Papa Bell</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/76738/Parts-Per-Hundred-or-Parts-Per-One#1140259</link>	
		<description>I&apos;m a former sportswriter and sports agate editor. Unfortunately, I&apos;ve never heard of a specific term for what you&apos;re describing here.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Realize that baseball stats were originally developed by a writer named &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_Chadwick_%28writer%29&quot;&gt;Henry Chadwick&lt;/a&gt; in the late 19th century, and then filtered through early 20th century sportswriting and radio broadcasts, both of which had their own usages of jargon (e.g. &quot;Three-fifty&quot; is easier to say on the radio than &quot;point three five,&quot; and &quot;he&apos;s batting a thousand&quot; is both more fun to write and say than &quot;his batting average is 100 percent.&quot;).&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Baseball is steeped in both tradition and a traditional love for silly wordsmithing -- witness the numerous nicknames for a &quot;home run,&quot; which is &lt;em&gt;itself &lt;/em&gt;a nickname. All these little language quirks are they way they are because ... well ... because that&apos;s the way they are! ;-)</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2007:site.76738-1140259</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 16:45:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cool Papa Bell</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: pombe</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/76738/Parts-Per-Hundred-or-Parts-Per-One#1140265</link>	
		<description>&quot;Decimal percentage&quot; sounds weird to my ears.  If I was being pedantic, I would want to call it a probability, which is what is really being measured.  I.e. an OBP of 0.447 means that in the past you have gotten on base 447/1000 times.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
For something like slugging, I would use the more generic term &quot;statistic&quot; or &quot;metric&quot;, but that&apos;s my scientist side talking, not the baseball fan side!&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;small&gt;and don&apos;t even get me started on the lack of statistical significance of some of these numbers - I always love when they say that some hitter has an avg of 0.250 against a pitcher, when he&apos;s only faced the pitcher four times.  Technically correct, but meaningless.&lt;/small&gt;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2007:site.76738-1140265</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 16:49:20 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>pombe</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: oddman</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/76738/Parts-Per-Hundred-or-Parts-Per-One#1140326</link>	
		<description>Why not simply accept that &quot;percentage&quot; is a technical term in baseball jargon that happens to be homonymous with the mathematical term &quot;percentage?&quot;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2007:site.76738-1140326</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 17:46:24 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>oddman</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: Large Marge</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/76738/Parts-Per-Hundred-or-Parts-Per-One#1140387</link>	
		<description>thousandths?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2007:site.76738-1140387</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 18:48:07 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Large Marge</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: rokusan</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/76738/Parts-Per-Hundred-or-Parts-Per-One#1140431</link>	
		<description>Oddman: because I need a label for numbers in each format, basically.  &quot;This is a percentage, this is... baseball-percentage-thing.&quot; Good point, though.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
C.P.B.: Yes, I am not really complaining... I just need a term so that I can refer to both kinds of &quot;percentage&quot; non-ambiguously. The stuff about &quot;a thousand&quot; and OBP and such was me attempting to help possible answerers who didn&apos;t know baseball lingo. I&apos;m hep.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2007:site.76738-1140431</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 19:27:46 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rokusan</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: 23skidoo</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/76738/Parts-Per-Hundred-or-Parts-Per-One#1140642</link>	
		<description>&lt;em&gt;This seems to me to be a mangling of what &quot;percent&quot; means, which I think means parts per hundred, not parts per one.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
It&apos;s still a percent, it&apos;s just written as a decimal.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;em&gt;Is there a concise but mathematically accurate term for this kind of expression?&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Percent expressed as a decimal to three places.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2007:site.76738-1140642</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 00:14:39 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>23skidoo</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: yclipse</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/76738/Parts-Per-Hundred-or-Parts-Per-One#1140700</link>	
		<description>Jeez, guys. Eleven responses without an answer? &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&quot;Batting average&quot;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2007:site.76738-1140700</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 03:08:27 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>yclipse</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: oddman</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/76738/Parts-Per-Hundred-or-Parts-Per-One#1140716</link>	
		<description>If you are just looking for a way to talk about both kinds of values clearly and you are willing to drop the criterion that both terms be &quot;mathematically accurate,&quot; then I might try something like &quot;baseball-percentage&quot; or &quot;sports-percentage&quot; (since the use of &quot;four-hundred&quot; to mean 0.4 occurs in other sports too, especially when discussing winning percentage). All that you would have to do is provide a definition in a footnote or parenthetical comment.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
As I hinted above, I would happily drop the desire for mathematical accuracy since, it seems to me, the sports scores aren&apos;t really math units.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2007:site.76738-1140716</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 04:25:32 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>oddman</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: rokusan</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/76738/Parts-Per-Hundred-or-Parts-Per-One#1140978</link>	
		<description>Yeh, yclipse, AskMe&apos;s definitely sub-Mendoza on this one. &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I think oddman&apos;s done the best job of helping me resign to the fact there may be no good answer, here.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2007:site.76738-1140978</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 08:35:21 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rokusan</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: TheSecretDecoderRing</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/76738/Parts-Per-Hundred-or-Parts-Per-One#1141329</link>	
		<description>It&apos;s not exclusive to baseball. Like oddman mentions, it&apos;s used in winning percentages, and the same 3-place decimals are used in stuff like goalies&apos; save percentage in hockey. In basketball, they actually do use percentages in the true sense of the word (&quot;80.0% free throws,&quot; &quot;22.5% three-pointers).&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
If anything, I guess baseball&apos;s &quot;percentages&quot; are just a misnomer. To add to the confusion, there are some stats that actually are percentages, like stolen base and stolen base rates. OBP and slugging are relatively recent stats, so I&apos;m guessing they utilize the &quot;percentage&quot; moniker just out of familiarity.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
The one stat that bugs me is the hits/at-bats ratio, which often uses a hyphen (he&apos;s 1-3 today). Whereas a pitcher&apos;s win-loss record, for example, will also use a hyphen (he&apos;s 1-3 for the year). I think Fox uses a slash for h/ab, which oughta be the right way, I say.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2007:site.76738-1141329</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 12:18:44 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TheSecretDecoderRing</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
