<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

      <title>Comments on: ID this UI &amp; Video Fair Use</title>
      <link>http://ask.metafilter.com/76641/ID-this-UI-amp-Video-Fair-Use/</link>
      <description>Comments on Ask MetaFilter post ID this UI &amp; Video Fair Use</description>
	  	  <pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 17:06:06 -0800</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 17:06:06 -0800</lastBuildDate>
      <language>en-us</language>
	  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	  <ttl>60</ttl>

<item>
  	<title>Question: ID this UI &amp;amp; Video Fair Use</title>
  	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/76641/ID-this-UI-amp-Video-Fair-Use</link>	
  	<description>Two Totally Unrelated Questions About &lt;a href=&quot;http://gawker.com/news/big-questions/what-ineffable-cusses-did-sophia-say-to-guylan-on-kid-nation-323756.php?autoplay=true&quot;&gt;THIS VIDEO&lt;/a&gt;.  Not the content of the video, but the usage.

1) What flash player/UI is that?  Perhaps I&apos;m mistaken, but I feel like I&apos;ve been seeing it not just on Gawker sites, but on many others.  Is that a standard player UI that is built into Flash for output to .flv files?

2)  Obviously this is totally unauthorized usage.  Would this be considered &quot;fair use&quot;?  Can anyone recommend any articles on the current state of fair use and online video?  Are companies like Gawker and Huffington Post (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2007/11/19/donny-osmond-apologizes-t_n_73347.html&quot;&gt;example&lt;/a&gt;) on firm legal ground with this kind of excerpting, which they then host in their own systems/servers, or are they just gambling that the web is so anarchic, that Mr. Big Media Company won&apos;t come a suin&apos;? </description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">post:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.76641</guid>
  	<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 16:25:02 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>MaxVonCretin</dc:creator>
	
	<category>video</category>
	
	<category>fairuse</category>
	
	<category>flash</category>
	
	<category>UI</category>
	
	<category>copyright</category>
	
	<category>huffpo</category>
	
	<category>gawker</category>
	
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: TeatimeGrommit</title>
  	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/76641/ID-this-UI-amp-Video-Fair-Use#1138703</link>	
  	<description>Fair use hasn&apos;t stopped anyone from suing before.  I don&apos;t think it would in this case either.  At a minimum they&apos;ll get a cease and desist if they don&apos;t have permission.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.76641-1138703</guid>
  	<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 17:06:06 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>TeatimeGrommit</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: DarlingBri</title>
  	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/76641/ID-this-UI-amp-Video-Fair-Use#1138709</link>	
  	<description>IANAL. However, I am pretty confident that Gawker, Huffington &amp;amp; Co can use video and/or images under the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.copyright.gov/fls/fl102.html&quot;&gt;Fair Use Doctrine&lt;/a&gt;, specifically as &amp;quot;a review or criticism for purposes of illustration or comment.&amp;quot; Which is exactly what that example is IMHO.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.76641-1138709</guid>
  	<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 17:10:17 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>DarlingBri</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: meehawl</title>
  	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/76641/ID-this-UI-amp-Video-Fair-Use#1138729</link>	
  	<description>It&apos;s &amp;quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://cache.gawker.com/assets/base.v5/js/swfobject.js&quot;&gt;newvideoplayer()&lt;/a&gt;&amp;quot; function calling &lt;a href=&quot;http://cache.gawker.com/assets/util/videoModule.swf&quot;&gt;VideoModule.swf&lt;/a&gt;. Seems &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;q=videoModule.swf&amp;btnG=Search&quot;&gt;quite&lt;/a&gt; popular.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.76641-1138729</guid>
  	<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 17:27:53 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>meehawl</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: drjimmy11</title>
  	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/76641/ID-this-UI-amp-Video-Fair-Use#1139097</link>	
  	<description>the player is made by a guy named &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.jeroenwijering.com/?item=JW_FLV_Player&quot;&gt;Jeron Wijering&lt;/a&gt;. it&apos;s very good and he licenses it very cheap (10-100 Euros), so a lot of people, including Youtube, use it.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
he lets you skin it, but some people keep the default controls, which is what you see on gawker.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.76641-1139097</guid>
  	<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 22:31:49 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>drjimmy11</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: MaxVonCretin</title>
  	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/76641/ID-this-UI-amp-Video-Fair-Use#1139406</link>	
  	<description>Thanks all!</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.76641-1139406</guid>
  	<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 07:32:24 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>MaxVonCretin</dc:creator>
</item>

    </channel>
</rss>
