<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: And thank you for thanking me for thanking you!</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/76059/And-thank-you-for-thanking-me-for-thanking-you/</link>
	<description>Comments on Ask MetaFilter post And thank you for thanking me for thanking you!</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 10:44:03 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 10:44:03 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Question: And thank you for thanking me for thanking you!</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/76059/And-thank-you-for-thanking-me-for-thanking-you</link>	
		<description>Does an e-mail thank-you note require a response? &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; Twice this weekend I have received e-mails that are, essentially, thank you notes.  One was from a professional acquaintance I met by organizing an event for him.  He thanked me for how enjoyable the event turned out to be.  The other was from a friend, who just wanted to let my significant other and I know she had a great time at an informal gathering we hosted.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I have no clue if it is appropriate to respond to such e-mails, nor do I have any clue what I could say in response.  &quot;Great!  I&apos;m glad you enjoyed it,&quot; and &quot;And thanks to you for coming!&quot; are all I can come up with.  They both sound pretty stilted and dorky.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
If these were regular, mailed thank-you cards, I would assume that no response was necessary.  But since it is e-mail, it seems like there might be slightly different standards.  &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Any clue on what the etiquette is here?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:ask.metafilter.com,2007:site.76059</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 10:42:17 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ms. Saint</dc:creator>
		
			<category>email</category>
		
			<category>thankyounote</category>
		
			<category>etiquette</category>
		
	</item> <item>
		<title>By: 45moore45</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/76059/And-thank-you-for-thanking-me-for-thanking-you#1130184</link>	
		<description>You have nothing to lose by saying exactly what you already thought of &quot;glad you enjoyed the get together, thanks for coming!&quot;.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2007:site.76059-1130184</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 10:44:03 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>45moore45</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: nitsuj</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/76059/And-thank-you-for-thanking-me-for-thanking-you#1130188</link>	
		<description>&quot;You&apos;re welcome. I had an enjoyable time too! Thanks for coming.&quot;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2007:site.76059-1130188</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 10:44:39 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nitsuj</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: jessamyn</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/76059/And-thank-you-for-thanking-me-for-thanking-you#1130190</link>	
		<description>I think it&apos;s fine, absent any other indication that they are trying to open up some sort of discussion, to just not reply. In fact unless I&apos;m having an ongoing conversation with someone, I tend to not reply to emails that don&apos;t have some sort of question or action item in them. Email is more like regular mail than it is like a telephone call. That was very nice of your friends to send you thank you notes.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2007:site.76059-1130190</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 10:46:53 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jessamyn</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: JohnnyGunn</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/76059/And-thank-you-for-thanking-me-for-thanking-you#1130203</link>	
		<description>No response necessary.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2007:site.76059-1130203</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 10:51:54 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>JohnnyGunn</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: jayder</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/76059/And-thank-you-for-thanking-me-for-thanking-you#1130267</link>	
		<description>My grandfather was locally famous in his small town for sending thank-you notes thanking people for their thank-you notes.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
The consensus of the people who remarked upon his habit, was that responding to a thank you note is supererogatory.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2007:site.76059-1130267</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 11:25:57 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jayder</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: grouse</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/76059/And-thank-you-for-thanking-me-for-thanking-you#1130332</link>	
		<description>Given that there is not much effort involved in a &quot;Glad you enjoyed it&quot; e-mail, I don&apos;t think there&apos;s a reason not to send one&amp;mdash;people won&apos;t think you&apos;re weird if you do. But you don&apos;t have to.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2007:site.76059-1130332</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 11:49:22 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>grouse</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: hurdy gurdy girl</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/76059/And-thank-you-for-thanking-me-for-thanking-you#1130520</link>	
		<description>I tend to think of e-mail as more like a conversation than like a traditional letter. If someone were having a conversation with me and said &quot;Thank you for the party--I had a great time!&quot; I would automatically say &quot;You&apos;re welcome. I&apos;m glad you had a good time.&quot; I don&apos;t think you are obligated to respond, but if you wanted to, a simple one-liner like that is probably fine.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2007:site.76059-1130520</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 13:31:25 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>hurdy gurdy girl</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: kisch mokusch</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/76059/And-thank-you-for-thanking-me-for-thanking-you#1130595</link>	
		<description>Since it&apos;s clear that going either way is acceptable, I would just do whatever you would like somebody to do if &lt;em&gt;you&lt;/em&gt; sent &lt;em&gt;them&lt;/em&gt; a thank-you email.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Personally, when I send a thank-you email, I don&apos;t expect a response, but it&apos;s always nice to get a reply (just to at least know they&apos;ve read it).</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2007:site.76059-1130595</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 14:04:51 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kisch mokusch</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: KAS</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/76059/And-thank-you-for-thanking-me-for-thanking-you#1130629</link>	
		<description>Actually, I like both of your proposed responses - nice, and short enough that I wouldn&apos;t feel like I had to respond back.  I always like to get a little something back when I send a thank you email, makes me feel appreciated.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2007:site.76059-1130629</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 14:21:36 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>KAS</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: arnicae</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/76059/And-thank-you-for-thanking-me-for-thanking-you#1130678</link>	
		<description>No response necessary- in fact, I&apos;ve found the &quot;thank you war&quot; can start getting uncomfortable.  They thank you for the invite.  You thank them for coming and the note.  They thank you for the thank you for the note. . .&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Ultimately, I get into these professionally (e.g. after being an invited speaker somewhere or other) and finally just delete an email (usually 5 or 6 &quot;thank you!&quot; iterations down the road) and feel somewhat guilty for several days.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2007:site.76059-1130678</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 14:55:12 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>arnicae</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: grouse</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/76059/And-thank-you-for-thanking-me-for-thanking-you#1130714</link>	
		<description>&lt;em&gt;in fact, I&apos;ve found the &quot;thank you war&quot; can start getting uncomfortable.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Then don&apos;t send a &quot;thank you for a thank you for a thank you.&quot; It&apos;s really a &quot;you&apos;re welcome.&quot;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2007:site.76059-1130714</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 15:11:59 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>grouse</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: divabat</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/76059/And-thank-you-for-thanking-me-for-thanking-you#1132095</link>	
		<description>When I read this out to my boyfriend, he remarked &quot;Why npt just Cheers?&quot;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2007:site.76059-1132095</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 16:32:08 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>divabat</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
