What is involved in starting a good book club?
November 4, 2007 10:02 AM
Subscribe
Have you successfully started a book club or meetup?
For a while now I've fantasied about starting a book club or meetup focusing on political readings (likely modern, anything from Machiavelli forward) with the idea being that the group would meet a few times a month to discuss the readings.
I have some apprehension though. For starters I've never been in a book club or gone to a meetup. So I'm not even sure if my idea is feasible.
Also I have an ulterior motive for the subject: I'm in a graduate program focusing on political theory and I hope that such a group would be an extra little motivator for staying up on my Hobbes (or whoever.)
I guess my questions are pretty generic:
- How do you structure such a club?
- How do you pick a venue? (I haven't approached my department yet about hosting the group on campus, but I probably will before moving forward...)
- What should dictate frequency of meetings or the focus?
- Is meetup (the website) a good way to organize such a group?
- What pitfalls should I be aware of?
Any other thoughts or suggestions? (I'm in Chicago if that matters...)
posted by wfrgms to sports, hobbies, & recreation (4 comments total)
3 users marked this as a favorite
I don't know about the feasibility of meeting "several times a month". We've met once each month over our group's history. That seems about right. Sometimes it's too quick. Sometimes it's way too long. But mostly it's about right.
In our case, we simply rotate the meeting among various members' homes. In your case, finding a place on campus sounds like a good idea. Does your library have meeting rooms?
Things we've found work well:
* Rotating book selection among members so that everyone gets a chance to pick something.
* Asking everyone to come with at least one question in order to keep things moving if there's a lull.
* When the person who selected the book takes the initiative to ask more questions or to direct the conversation.
* When there's at least one person who does a good job of making the conversation go deep. We used to have a member who could do this (he was an English teacher), and since he left, we've felt his absence.
The biggest pitfall, in my opinion comes from people who want to dominate the conversation. We don't have any formal rules regarding who gets to speak when, and I'm glad, but there have been times that we've wished certain members would just shut up.
My book group is different than the one you're proposing, of course, but I think similar principles apply.
posted by jdroth at 11:01 AM on November 4, 2007 [1 favorite has favorites]