<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

      <title>Comments on: searching for the Best Stuff on Amazon</title>
      <link>http://ask.metafilter.com/75298/searching-for-the-Best-Stuff-on-Amazon/</link>
      <description>Comments on Ask MetaFilter post searching for the Best Stuff on Amazon</description>
	  	  <pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 13:55:39 -0800</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 13:55:39 -0800</lastBuildDate>
      <language>en-us</language>
	  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	  <ttl>60</ttl>

<item>
  	<title>Question: searching for the Best Stuff on Amazon</title>
  	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/75298/searching-for-the-Best-Stuff-on-Amazon</link>	
  	<description>I enjoy finer things, and like to laugh at crappy stuff. Is there any way to search amazon to bring up the best or worst products (in a category or overall)? A list of &quot;all 5-star products&quot; would be too crude, so I&apos;m thinking, search for the combination of higest rating with most reviews, or lowest rating with most reviews. </description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">post:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.75298</guid>
  	<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 13:28:48 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>luser</dc:creator>
	
	<category>shopping</category>
	
	<category>amazon</category>
	
	<category>search</category>
	
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: DevilsAdvocate</title>
  	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/75298/searching-for-the-Best-Stuff-on-Amazon#1119034</link>	
  	<description>I think the mathematical technique you&apos;re looking for is the &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bayesian_average&quot;&gt;Bayesian average&lt;/a&gt;--essentially, it throws in a pre-specified, fixed number of &amp;quot;average&amp;quot; votes in with all the actual votes, so a lone high rating doesn&apos;t push something up to the top of the ratings list.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://us.imdb.com/chart/top&quot;&gt;IMDB&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.boardgamegeek.com/browser.php?itemtype=game&amp;sortby=rank&quot;&gt;BoardGameGeek&lt;/a&gt; both do this for their rankings; to my knowledge, Amazon does not.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.75298-1119034</guid>
  	<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 13:55:39 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>DevilsAdvocate</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: 45moore45</title>
  	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/75298/searching-for-the-Best-Stuff-on-Amazon#1119119</link>	
  	<description>Is Amazon going to admit anything they sell is &amp;quot;crappy&amp;quot; by coding it somehow so you could search it that way?  I don&apos;t think so.  You know who has fun crappy stuff?  the Archie McPhee catalog.  Rubber chickens and lots of nuns, monkeys in shriner hats, tiki...pure loveable crapola.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.75298-1119119</guid>
  	<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 15:11:34 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>45moore45</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: vegetableagony</title>
  	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/75298/searching-for-the-Best-Stuff-on-Amazon#1119191</link>	
  	<description>Devilsadvocate is correct about Bayesian Statistics being used for this sort of purpose.  The idea is that most things are probably about average, so we can use this &amp;quot;prior knowledge&amp;quot; to temper our predictions about a new item when it only has a small number of measurements (reviews).  In practice though for any item with a large number of reviews you will get almost exactly the same value as if you did a traditional average.  The difference being that for items with a small number of reviews the Bayseian average will be closer to the overall average of the whole population (ie less extreme, a item with a single 5 star review will be given a rating much smaller than 5).  &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
In essense items with a very high or low Bayseian average will be exactly the items you are looking for.  &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
As to how to search for them, I would hope that Amazon already does this, as many other sites already do &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
http://blogs.wsj.com/numbersguy/a-closer-look-at-online-rankings-200&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
but if not you&apos;d have to write a script to do the baysian calculation based on number of reviews and average rating.  If you were going to do this I&apos;d suggest looking into brushing up on your statistics first.  &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Goodluck</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.75298-1119191</guid>
  	<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 16:35:37 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>vegetableagony</dc:creator>
</item>

    </channel>
</rss>
