<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: Is there an iWeb equivalent for Windows?</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/74137/Is-there-an-iWeb-equivalent-for-Windows/</link>
	<description>Comments on Ask MetaFilter post Is there an iWeb equivalent for Windows?</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 14:27:07 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 14:27:07 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Question: Is there an iWeb equivalent for Windows?</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/74137/Is-there-an-iWeb-equivalent-for-Windows</link>	
		<description>Is there a windows-equivalent to iWeb? I work at an elementary school. I have teachers who want the ease and bells &amp;amp; whistles of iWeb, but we&apos;re all windows here. I don&apos;t care how bloaty the code gets; I just want teachers to look and say &quot;ooooh, pretty!&quot;  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; I tried to convince them to use something simple like &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.vox.com&quot;&gt;Vox&lt;/a&gt;, but it isn&apos;t flexible enough.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:ask.metafilter.com,2007:site.74137</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 14:06:20 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dogwelder</dc:creator>
		
			<category>webpage</category>
		
			<category>webdesign</category>
		
			<category>html</category>
		
			<category>htmleditor</category>
		
			<category>iweb</category>
		
	</item> <item>
		<title>By: namewithoutwords</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/74137/Is-there-an-iWeb-equivalent-for-Windows#1102978</link>	
		<description>Wouldn&apos;t this be &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.microsoft.com/frontpage/&quot;&gt;Microsoft Frontpage?&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2007:site.74137-1102978</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 14:27:07 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>namewithoutwords</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: emalyse</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/74137/Is-there-an-iWeb-equivalent-for-Windows#1103025</link>	
		<description>You might find some of the newer online page creators nearer to iWeb, such as &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.weebly.com&quot;&gt;weebly&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2007:site.74137-1103025</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 14:59:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>emalyse</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: KokuRyu</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/74137/Is-there-an-iWeb-equivalent-for-Windows#1103084</link>	
		<description>What about Google Page Create or Google Apps?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2007:site.74137-1103084</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 15:38:11 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>KokuRyu</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: anildash</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/74137/Is-there-an-iWeb-equivalent-for-Windows#1103196</link>	
		<description>Adobe &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.adobe.com/products/contribute/&quot;&gt;Contribute&lt;/a&gt; and the free &lt;a href=&quot;http://kompozer.net/&quot;&gt;KompoZer&lt;/a&gt; are good options for this kind of work.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I work with the team that makes &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.typepad.com/&quot;&gt;TypePad&lt;/a&gt; (we also make Vox) and we&apos;ve seen a lot of people happy with using it to make simple websites, too. It does things like standalone web pages and photo galleries, which Vox deosn&apos;t easily do.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2007:site.74137-1103196</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 17:31:49 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>anildash</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
