My standard for verisimilitude is simple and I came to it when I started to write prose narrative: fuck the average reader. I was always told to write for the average reader in my newspaper life. The average reader, as they meant it, was some suburban white subscriber with two-point-whatever kids and three-point-whatever cars and a dog and a cat and lawn furniture. He knows nothing and he needs everything explained to him right away, so that exposition becomes this incredible, story-killing burden. Fuck him. Fuck him to hell.
This serves the dual purpose of opening upper-class America's eyes to the problems that plague our inner cities, and helping us identify with those that are usually written off as lazy, addicted, or just plain stupid.Perhaps that's why. I was thinking that maybe it's people who are aware of all these things and who know how much a show like this needs to be seen by the upper class. But are they taking it that way? I watched it (I'm not upper class) and I imagine those people it's aimed at shaking up (who need to be) are just going to watch it as a cop show, with a bunch of violent minorities. I appreciate that the show is apparently very good, but at the same time I'd love to see a show that critiqued the things this show is purported to critique, without it seeming like I'm watching New Jack and Boyz in the Hood every other week, and exclaiming about how "life affirming" it is.
So my sales pitch is...if what is holding you back is fear of a show about sports writers, fret not and give it a try.
posted by ian1977 at 10:06 AM on October 16, 2007