Quality of life vs. quantity
October 2, 2007 6:25 PM
Subscribe
My 82 y.o. mother has stage 4 cancer. It's not known if it originated from lung or breast, both of which she was previously treated for. She's currently alert, but very weak, and on continuous oxygen. The decision to be made involves an apparent growth that's pressing her esophagus closed.
She has everything someone in her situation needs: she and my father are in an assisted living facility connected to a nursing home, with hospice care. She's not overly uncomfortable, and all preparations such as DNR orders have been dealt with.
The treatment options available are a feeding tube or a stent, but my parents are inclined to let nature take its course, and my siblings and I are inclined to agree. The feeding tube is out of the question in any event, but I guess I just want to confirm my gut feeling that a stent would likely offer only a chance of prolonged suffering. With quality of life being more important than quantity, might such a procedure be worthwhile? Thanks.
posted by sgass to health & fitness (6 comments total)
A South Korean study of 83 patients concludes that "patency rates of esophageal/GEJ obstruction were 93.5, 78.1 and 67.0% at 30, 90 and 180 days, respectively." In other words, about 1/3 of the stents become occluded again within 6 months.
I can't really comment on your decision, but I just thought I'd throw that tidbit of information out there.
posted by jytsai at 6:45 PM on October 2, 2007