house a vs house b, cage match!
September 14, 2007 4:01 PM
Subscribe
A tale of two houses: House owned by agency A - our first choice in a rental. House owned by agency B - our second, but still cool choice. We've been offered House B (small applause). House A, however, is being held up in the approval process, because my boyfriend's old landlord wont verify that he rented from them. Guess who the landlord is?
Yes, the agency who has offered us house B. I hope this is clear, because its confusing the hell out of me. My best guess, though I could be wrong, is that agency owning house B is stonewalling agency A because they know if they give up the information, they could lose us as prospective tenants. They claim that the property has been sold, and since they no longer own it, they can't verify. They also claim not to know who owns it now. I've alerted agency A that I think we are being stonewalled, and they say its our problem - if it cant be verified, we don't get the house. Does this sound unreasonable to anyone else? Is there a way to go around the system and verify through an outside source. My head is spinning. Sorry if anyone else's is after reading this.
posted by fillsthepews to home & garden (8 comments total)
In NZ all bonds go to a central agency where they are held during the tenancy (Tenancy Services) and their records would be proof of rental. I don't think you have anything similar but tracking down the deposit (receipts, cancelled cheques, letters about getting it returned, etc) could be a good place to start.
posted by shelleycat at 4:12 PM on September 14, 2007