Being taxed as a business, despite being a public employee
September 5, 2007 6:28 PM
Subscribe
Los Angeles is hitting me for a big chunk of money for business taxes... this despite the fact that I am a public employee.
(In advance: The answer to this question may very well be "get a lawyer/accountant," but I'm not flush with cash at the moment and would like to know what steps I can take short of that.)
I'm a teacher, and I do a small amount of work as a musician. I moved to CA in 2005, and filed taxes for that year here. I included 1099 forms (all from work done in FL, no less) in my tax filings for that year. I also did a small amount of musical work as an independent contractor in CA during 2006.
LA has decided that I am a business for some reason (I don't know why yet), and has decided to tax me. That's cool... but they are apparently basing their estimated tax on all of my income, including that earned as a teacher. The estimated tax far exceeds what I made from my independent contractor work last year in CA.
I'm filing for a hearing (it doesn't help matters that they've apparently tried to contact me, but I moved a few times last year for personal reasons, and some of my mail is just now starting to catch up with me a year later). I have no idea what to expect, what they want from me in terms of documentation, and so on.
I'm sure I'm leaving relevant information out. I have a lot of general anxiety about all matter financial as a matter of course, am having a world-class freakout over this at the moment, and I might be (hell, probably am) mis-explaining. I'll answer questions in the thread... I think my main reason to posting to AskMe is to find out what questions I should be asking LA about this. Thanks.
posted by the_bone to work & money (4 comments total)
I'm a little unclear on the timeline, though. For what time period are you being asked to pay incorrect taxes: 2005, 2006, or a recent quarter of 2007? sounds like you moved to CA from FL sometime in 2005. In FL through 2005, you were a teacher and occasional musician; in CA, in 2005 and 2006, you were also a teacher and occasional musician. In 2006, you filed your 2005 taxes in CA, including your 1099 work in FL (why?). For state and local taxes, LA is asking that for 2006 (?) you pay taxes on your teacher's salary and your independent earnings as a business? Or is this about the year 2005, where you're being asked to pay taxes on your FL teacher's salary along with the CA music work, all in CA? See, the latter seems the only reason CA would care about your teacher's salary (surely you're not the only CA teacher with side income?), but then they shouldn't be asking for taxes on FL earnings.
Here, do this:
posted by hincandenza at 8:44 PM on September 5, 2007