Comments on: What streets in San Francisco have timed lights?

Question: What streets in San Francisco have timed lights?

k7lim — Wed, 05 Sep 2007 11:09:50 -0800

What streets in San Francisco have timed series of stoplights for faster travel? I've heard that Bush is timed. And I've been told that Franklin is a good alternative to Van Ness going north. Does the "timedness" of the lights vary by time of day?

Some lights in SF are timed so that a driver going the speed limit will tend to hit green lights all in a row. Now that Google Maps lets us drag the route to a desired point, we can take advantage of this in directions!

By: bitdamaged

bitdamaged — Wed, 05 Sep 2007 11:11:23 -0800

Pine and Bush, Oak and Fell are the 2 sets I know of.

By: ambrosia

ambrosia — Wed, 05 Sep 2007 11:17:32 -0800

Franklin and Gough are absolutely better alternatives to VanNastiNess.

Great Highway out by the beach is timed to keep you at the speed limit.

By: bitdamaged

bitdamaged — Wed, 05 Sep 2007 11:19:24 -0800

Oh there's a stretch of Fell/10th Street as well heading south.

The way to hit is to make the left turn off of Van Ness onto Fell (Note this is the World's Shortest Turn Light ...I kid you not, its only green for 4 seconds 3-4 cars max - the yellow is longer). When you make the turn the lights will start timing up at market until you hit the on ramp at Bryant.

Not sure if they are timed the other way on 9th since I'm mostly there during traffic hours.

By: otherwordlyglow

otherwordlyglow — Wed, 05 Sep 2007 11:22:45 -0800

19th Avenue south of Golden Gate Park is timed sometimes but not as usefully as Oak/Fell Bush/Pine. I still get stuck sometimes on 19th.

By: otherwordlyglow

otherwordlyglow — Wed, 05 Sep 2007 11:24:50 -0800

And I disagree about Franklin/Gough always being better than Van Ness. In heavy traffic, those two totally suck with all the turns and pedestrians. It's often much better to take Van Ness and hope for the best, even if it isn't timed.

By: trip and a half

trip and a half — Wed, 05 Sep 2007 11:32:03 -0800

Isn't Lombard (the flat part) timed? (I don't drive so I don't know, but that was my impression.)

By: oneirodynia

oneirodynia — Wed, 05 Sep 2007 11:32:26 -0800

Franklin and Gough are absolutely better alternatives to VanNastiNess.

Agreed. I used to have many clients in Pac Heights when I worked in the Mission. Much driving back and forth at various times of day, and F and G always worked out to be faster, even if crowded.

By: fandango_matt

fandango_matt — Wed, 05 Sep 2007 11:41:38 -0800

Turk and Golden Gate, both east of Divisadero.

By: bitdamaged

bitdamaged — Wed, 05 Sep 2007 11:45:45 -0800

"Isn't Lombard (the flat part) timed?"

No.. and this pisses me off every day monday through friday ;-)

Franklin definitely beats Van Ness, Gough can be hit or miss.

By: muscat

muscat — Wed, 05 Sep 2007 12:22:45 -0800

Broadway tunnel!

By: BigBwana

BigBwana — Wed, 05 Sep 2007 13:50:48 -0800

I take Bush every morning to work and whenever else I can. The "timedness" does vary in that during the morning commute the lights stay green longer than at other times. If I catch everything just right (first in line at the light on Masonic), I can make it all the way from Masonic to Sansome without stopping (or driving recklessly) despite there being more people on the road. At non-peak hours or on weekends this never seems to happen no matter how I catch the light on Masonic.

By: k7lim

k7lim — Wed, 05 Sep 2007 15:10:29 -0800

My friend says:
Kearny! is timed for sure.

By: fishfucker

fishfucker — Wed, 05 Sep 2007 16:43:00 -0800

The 'new' octavia is totally timed -- if everything's going as it should, you can often get from one end to the other without hitting a light from the offramp. in fact, the only problem with octavia is that no-one seems to understand how to STAY IN THEIR LANE when they're turning right onto it.

octavia, of course, leads to oak/fell.