<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: Navel wars</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/70075/Navel-wars/</link>
	<description>Comments on Ask MetaFilter post Navel wars</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2007 03:18:11 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2007 03:18:11 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Question: Navel wars</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/70075/Navel-wars</link>	
		<description>Why was showing an exposed female navel considered so taboo in Hollywood films and television shows (and I suppose in culture-in-general), especially in light that cleavage was allowed? &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; I reference not only the infamous Annette Funicello/Beach movies, but Barbara Eden in &lt;i&gt;I Dream of Jeanie&lt;/i&gt; in the mid to late &apos;60s, and I know there was some hullabaloo about refusing to allow an exposed navel on one of the original &lt;i&gt;Star Trek&lt;/i&gt; shows in the same time frame.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:ask.metafilter.com,2007:site.70075</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2007 01:50:43 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>edgeways</dc:creator>
		
			<category>Bellybutton</category>
		
			<category>navel</category>
		
			<category>film</category>
		
	</item> <item>
		<title>By: TheophileEscargot</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/70075/Navel-wars#1045972</link>	
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bikiniscience.com/chronology/1925-1930_SS/1925-1930.html&quot;&gt;Allegedly&lt;/a&gt; the &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Production_Code&quot;&gt;Hays Code&lt;/a&gt; which censored Hollywood forbade the navel, though I can&apos;t see any &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.artsreformation.com/a001/hays-code.html&quot;&gt;explicit reference&lt;/a&gt; to the navel in  it. I suspect it was just an arbritrary line that was drawn at some point and became customary.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2007:site.70075-1045972</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2007 03:18:11 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TheophileEscargot</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: Baud</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/70075/Navel-wars#1045988</link>	
		<description>I seem to recall an article saying that Mr Hays liked to thing of Mrs Hays&apos;navel as a perfectly logical place to put some erectile part of Mr Hays&apos; body. &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Hence the taboo.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2007:site.70075-1045988</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2007 04:59:59 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Baud</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: pants</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/70075/Navel-wars#1046001</link>	
		<description>The association of the navel with the erotic goes back to ancient Greece, according to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.identitytheory.com/nonfiction/day_navel.php&quot;&gt; this article&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br&gt;
&lt;em&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&quot;...For the ancient Greeks passion centered on the navel, or omphalos; Omphale was the mythical queen who so powerfully personified femininity that she enslaved even the mighty Hercules...&quot;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Just an idea. Not sure that Hays or anyone else in media would have been aware of that particular connection, but the underlying navel=female sexuality link may have persisted in Western culture on some level.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2007:site.70075-1046001</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2007 05:43:08 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>pants</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: fermezporte</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/70075/Navel-wars#1046033</link>	
		<description>Well, if you think about the fashions back then, it was much more difficult to actually expose your navel - pants and skirts button at or above the bellybutton.  Thus, to expose it, you&apos;d have to have your pants half unbuttoned, and that&apos;s obviously not okay.  Of course, that&apos;s not the case for bikinis or genie outfits.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2007:site.70075-1046033</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2007 07:13:59 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>fermezporte</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: Guy Smiley</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/70075/Navel-wars#1046127</link>	
		<description>Films, television shows, and &lt;i&gt;comic strips&lt;/i&gt;:  &lt;a href=&quot;http://books.google.com/books?id=hN07Rv1WpN8C&amp;pg=PT149&amp;lpg=PT149&amp;dq=beetle+bailey&apos;s+%22belly+button%22+box&amp;source=web&amp;ots=ZMjU0q1y-i&amp;sig=hT9OH0poBqPUfIZJ21EyzK15WE4#PPT149,M1&quot;&gt;Beetle Bailey&apos;s Belly-Button Box&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2007:site.70075-1046127</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2007 10:19:02 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Guy Smiley</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: meehawl</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/70075/Navel-wars#1046146</link>	
		<description>Because twisted a certain way, many belly buttons can resemble s sexually aroused vulva?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2007:site.70075-1046146</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2007 10:43:14 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>meehawl</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
