<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: Group Behavior</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/6901/Group-Behavior/</link>
	<description>Comments on Ask MetaFilter post Group Behavior</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2004 07:58:49 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2004 07:58:49 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Question: Group Behavior</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/6901/Group-Behavior</link>	
		<description>Psychology/Sociology Q [I think?]  Does anyone else experience participatory inhibition when immersed in a like minded group?  For example, a creative person becoming unusually shy/quiet within a team of creative people working on a [design] task?  Lurkers on MeFi or other online communities might be another example.  Or, the opposite: a creative person&apos;s creativity amplified [uninhibited?] in the presence of less creative people?&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Is it a matter of personality/psychology?  Is it confidence/self assuredness? Is it alterable?  Imaginary?!&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Sources for further reading and help clarifying the question appreciated.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:ask.metafilter.com,2004:site.6901</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2004 05:55:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>yoga</dc:creator>
		
			<category>psychology</category>
		
			<category>sociology</category>
		
			<category>inhibition</category>
		
			<category>groupbehavior</category>
		
			<category>groupdynamic</category>
		
			<category>shyness</category>
		
			<category>lurkers</category>
		
	</item> <item>
		<title>By: rocketman</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/6901/Group-Behavior#139257</link>	
		<description>I don&apos;t know about the science behind it, or anything like that, but I definitely experience it (the shyness and quiet in a creative group setting).&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Personally, I think it&apos;s a matter of comfort. I have never posted to MeFi, and comment pretty infrequently - part of the reason is because I&apos;m content to watch and evaluate others&apos; contributions. If something really struck me, I would post it, but everything that has shows up here in a matter of hours anyway.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I do, however, work extremely well in a creative group of 2 or 3 people (including myself).&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
One thing I find fascinating to observe in larger groups is the amplification of confidence. It&apos;s akin to the people who regularly post crap to the front page, and either don&apos;t know it or don&apos;t care. In meetings at work, I&apos;ve seen people take a similar &quot;shotgun full of shit&quot; approach to participating, and I find it embarrassing. They contribute ideas, which is okay, but they also continue to press hard for those ideas even after they&apos;ve been deemed unworkable or unsound.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I&apos;m all for determination, but it&apos;s important to recognize when you&apos;ve lost the fight.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2004:site.6901-139257</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2004 07:58:49 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rocketman</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: grumblebee</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/6901/Group-Behavior#139311</link>	
		<description>I run a small theatre company in NYC, and I&apos;ve noticed two very different sort of responses that various colleagues have when watching plays done by OTHER companies. &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Assuming the play is terrible, many of my associates will say, &quot;Thank GOD! I know we can do better than THAT!&quot;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
On the other hand, my reaction (and the reaction of some others that I know) to seeing a bad play is to get very depressed. A bad play gives me the (irrational) feeling that ALL theatre is bad. That doing theatre is worthless, and that my show will probably suck too. If I see a great piece of theatre, it excites me and makes me want to immediately run to rehearsal.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
A couple of years ago, I directed Shakespeare&apos;s &quot;The Winters Tale,&quot; and by an odd coincidence, there were three other companies doing the same play around the same time. Mine was to be the last one to open.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I was SO excited. I went to see all the other productions. I thought it was thrilling to be able to see four (very different) interpretations.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
But many of my collaborators were depressed by the &quot;competition,&quot; and announced that under NO circumstances would they see the other versions.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I guess it comes down to (a) do you feel that you are in competition with the other artists, and (b) are you worried about &quot;being original&quot;?&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
The second question is really interesting. To me, art ISN&apos;T about being original. Art is about telling a story (or evoking an image or a sound or whatever). &quot;Being original&quot; is about ME and MY EGO, and has nothing to do with the story.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
As a director, it&apos;s my job to do whatever is best for the story. So if I get an idea from someone else&apos;s production that would serve the story better than my own idea, then it&apos;s my duty to use the other person&apos;s idea.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Obviously, I need to avoid plagiarism. But the point is, I try to serve the story and not me. When I was younger, that was hard. I wanted people to walk out of the theatre saying, &quot;Wow! That director came up with some really cool ideas.&quot; Now I cringe when I hear that. I try not to be cool.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Once I developed this philosophy, it was very easy for me to give up serving my ego and serve the play instead. And once I started doing that, I LOVED exchanging ideas with other practitioners.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2004:site.6901-139311</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2004 09:58:50 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>grumblebee</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: Tubes</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/6901/Group-Behavior#139324</link>	
		<description>I find that I&apos;m energized working with other creative people, and I&apos;m generally comfortable with participating actively. However, when confined with overly-talkative, self-involved people I tend to both tune out and clam up. I get to thinking &quot;I&apos;m not here to waste time competing with you to get a word in edgewise.&quot; To me, it&apos;s not at all a shy/quiet thing, though it might appear that way. It&apos;s more like &quot;if you don&apos;t really want my input then I&apos;m (mentally) out of here.&quot;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
To my mind, the &quot;participatory inhibition&quot; described by &apos;yoga&apos; is more likely a result of personality and social factors than of some creativity-wave pattern-interference.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2004:site.6901-139324</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2004 10:23:21 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tubes</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: headless</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/6901/Group-Behavior#139349</link>	
		<description>Deborah Tannen&apos;s book &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.powells.com/cgi-bin/biblio?inkey=1-0688112439-35&quot;&gt;Talking from 9 to 5&lt;/a&gt; addresses situations like you describe.  She covers a variety of topics related to workplace conversation.  My roommate had the book lying around and I picked it up and found it so compelling I read the whole thing.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2004:site.6901-139349</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2004 11:09:04 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>headless</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: luriete</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/6901/Group-Behavior#139454</link>	
		<description>this happens to me. i was once invited to a luncheon of brilliant and well-known graphic artists in san francisco. i was asked because, i think, they expected help with a new project from me. i was totally mute, and not just star-struck, but i became totally shy. i am never shy with anyone else - just other professionals in my field (and sometimes, for some reason, with my parents, but we&apos;ll let freud deal with that one).</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2004:site.6901-139454</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2004 15:29:45 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>luriete</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: icetaco</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/6901/Group-Behavior#139532</link>	
		<description>Here&apos;s my story: I made contact with a local group who create in the same medium I enjoy. I was excited and nervous about the first time I was invited to one of their informal get-togethers, and was too intimidated to say much while I was there. They were all older, and some made good livings with their art; I felt totally outclassed. They all knew each other pretty well, so I felt like an outsider in that way, too. I haven&apos;t gone back to a group get-together since then; I may give it another try sometime in the future, though.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I find I&apos;m most creative when all alone. I work with some of the best designers in the country every day, and they&apos;re decent, nice people. It took me a long time, though, before I began to feel that I could even talk about my own artistic pursuits.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2004:site.6901-139532</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2004 21:45:13 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>icetaco</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
