<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: Wireless Networking Standard With Higher Frequency Than Cordless Phones?</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/6745/Wireless-Networking-Standard-With-Higher-Frequency-Than-Cordless-Phones/</link>
	<description>Comments on Ask MetaFilter post Wireless Networking Standard With Higher Frequency Than Cordless Phones?</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2004 19:31:05 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2004 19:31:05 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Question: Wireless Networking Standard With Higher Frequency Than Cordless Phones?</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/6745/Wireless-Networking-Standard-With-Higher-Frequency-Than-Cordless-Phones</link>	
		<description>80211b vs 80211g: According to my research, both are using the 2.4ghz freq as are cordless telephones. Isn&apos;t there a wireless networking standard that uses higher frequencies so that there&apos;s no interference from cordless phones?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:ask.metafilter.com,2004:site.6745</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2004 19:14:40 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fupped Duck</dc:creator>
		
			<category>wireless</category>
		
			<category>networking</category>
		
			<category>phones</category>
		
			<category>cordless</category>
		
	</item> <item>
		<title>By: adampsyche</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/6745/Wireless-Networking-Standard-With-Higher-Frequency-Than-Cordless-Phones#137152</link>	
		<description>I had that problem, then &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/B00006IS9F/qid=1082773787/sr=1-2/ref=sr_1_2_etk-electronics/102-1633230-9825733?v=glance&amp;s=electronics&amp;n=172282&quot;&gt;bought this&lt;/a&gt;. No more problem. Phone and wireless can be used at the same time, even though the phone is 2.4 one way and 5.8 another.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2004:site.6745-137152</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2004 19:31:05 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>adampsyche</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: Tenuki</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/6745/Wireless-Networking-Standard-With-Higher-Frequency-Than-Cordless-Phones#137154</link>	
		<description>802.11a is up in the 5-GHz range.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2004:site.6745-137154</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2004 19:36:06 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tenuki</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: Fupped Duck</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/6745/Wireless-Networking-Standard-With-Higher-Frequency-Than-Cordless-Phones#137178</link>	
		<description>thx 2 u both</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2004:site.6745-137178</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2004 20:33:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fupped Duck</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: hattifattener</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/6745/Wireless-Networking-Standard-With-Higher-Frequency-Than-Cordless-Phones#137225</link>	
		<description>Also, neither the 802.11 nor the phone are going to be taking up the entire band (it&apos;s about 80 MHz wide).</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2004:site.6745-137225</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2004 22:58:43 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>hattifattener</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: kindall</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/6745/Wireless-Networking-Standard-With-Higher-Frequency-Than-Cordless-Phones#137249</link>	
		<description>Your microwave oven is a much bigger threat to your wireless connection than your cordless phone. I have a set of Panasonic 2.4 GHz phones -- no problem with WiFi at all.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2004:site.6745-137249</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Apr 2004 00:18:24 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kindall</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: yerfatma</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/6745/Wireless-Networking-Standard-With-Higher-Frequency-Than-Cordless-Phones#137302</link>	
		<description>With XP? Everytime I call out on the phone near the computer XP claims my Wifi connection is gone (which leads to the ironic situation where I can&apos;t be on the phone and the Internet at the same time in spite of a broadband connection). I can get the connection back by opening &quot;View Available Wireless Networks&quot; and refreshing a few times until it reconnects. &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
AFAIK, it&apos;s an XP-only issue, resulting from XP&apos;s idiotic handling of wireless connections: anything thta interrupts for a split-second is handled as a lost connection.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2004:site.6745-137302</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Apr 2004 08:32:08 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>yerfatma</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: five fresh fish</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/6745/Wireless-Networking-Standard-With-Higher-Frequency-Than-Cordless-Phones#137318</link>	
		<description>Ooooh.  I&apos;ll bet that&apos;s why I lose connection: probably a neighbour in my condo complex has a 2.4 phone.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
The next question, naturally, is whether there&apos;s a replacement for XP&apos;s idiotic software...</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2004:site.6745-137318</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Apr 2004 09:15:08 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>five fresh fish</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: adamrice</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/6745/Wireless-Networking-Standard-With-Higher-Frequency-Than-Cordless-Phones#137453</link>	
		<description>Of course, there are also 900-MHz cordless phones (supposedly poorer signal quality, but mine sounds fine), and for that matter, I&apos;m pretty sure there are 5.8 GHz models.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2004:site.6745-137453</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Apr 2004 16:35:23 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>adamrice</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: stew560</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/6745/Wireless-Networking-Standard-With-Higher-Frequency-Than-Cordless-Phones#137528</link>	
		<description>Exactly why I got 900 MHz phones :) They work fine...now if only my apartment wiring was better...</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2004:site.6745-137528</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Apr 2004 21:53:27 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>stew560</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
