<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

      <title>Comments on: How to define this language mistake?</title>
      <link>http://ask.metafilter.com/67192/How-to-define-this-language-mistake/</link>
      <description>Comments on Ask MetaFilter post How to define this language mistake?</description>
	  	  <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 15:10:33 -0800</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 15:10:33 -0800</lastBuildDate>
      <language>en-us</language>
	  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	  <ttl>60</ttl>

<item>
  	<title>Question: How to define this language mistake?</title>
  	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/67192/How-to-define-this-language-mistake</link>	
  	<description>Is there a term for mangling two words to create a new word or term? In conversations with two different people they&apos;ve incorrectly combined words or terms to express themselves.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
During the first discussion, the guy described his misunderstanding of what someone was saying by stating, &quot;I misconscrewed it up.&quot;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
The second time, another guy  explained his inability to talk while upset by saying he was, &quot;flustrated.&quot;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Malaprop is the closest I&apos;ve come, but it&apos;s not quite what happens.  And I&apos;d love to hear other examples, because I think there&apos;s a strange brilliance to this phenomenon.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">post:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.67192</guid>
  	<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 15:08:31 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>suki</dc:creator>
	
	<category>language</category>
	
	<category>speech</category>
	
	<category>grammar</category>
	
	<category>linguistics</category>
	
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: nowonmai</title>
  	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/67192/How-to-define-this-language-mistake#1006910</link>	
  	<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portmanteau&quot;&gt;Portmanteau.&lt;/a&gt;</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.67192-1006910</guid>
  	<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 15:10:33 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>nowonmai</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: kcm</title>
  	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/67192/How-to-define-this-language-mistake#1006911</link>	
  	<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.reference.com/search?r=13&amp;q=Portmanteau&quot;&gt;Portmanteau&lt;/a&gt; is also close but not technically 100% what you&apos;re asking.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.67192-1006911</guid>
  	<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 15:10:40 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>kcm</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: KokuRyu</title>
  	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/67192/How-to-define-this-language-mistake#1006924</link>	
  	<description>Malapropism comes close.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
The Sopranos was good for that:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
We&apos;re in a f***ing stagmire here!</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.67192-1006924</guid>
  	<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 15:22:45 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>KokuRyu</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: adamrice</title>
  	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/67192/How-to-define-this-language-mistake#1006926</link>	
  	<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spoonerism&quot;&gt;Spoonerism&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.67192-1006926</guid>
  	<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 15:23:38 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>adamrice</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: GaelFC</title>
  	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/67192/How-to-define-this-language-mistake#1006928</link>	
  	<description>I like &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sniglet&quot;&gt;Sniglet,&lt;/a&gt; though not all those words are mashed-up words.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.67192-1006928</guid>
  	<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 15:25:19 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>GaelFC</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: ludwig_van</title>
  	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/67192/How-to-define-this-language-mistake#1006932</link>	
  	<description>It&apos;s not spoonerism. More like a portmanteau combined with a malapropism. So I&apos;d go with malamanteau or a portmanpropism.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.67192-1006932</guid>
  	<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 15:31:42 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>ludwig_van</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: PercussivePaul</title>
  	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/67192/How-to-define-this-language-mistake#1006937</link>	
  	<description>searching wikipedia for the answer to this question (which I coulnd&apos;t find) turned out to be really run. i could barely contain my laughter when reading these &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murray_Walker#.27Murrayisms.27&quot;&gt;Murrayisms&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.67192-1006937</guid>
  	<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 15:35:14 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>PercussivePaul</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: googly</title>
  	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/67192/How-to-define-this-language-mistake#1006958</link>	
  	<description>Another possibility: &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neologism&quot;&gt;neologism&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
It is not precisely what you are talking about, but (unlike most portmanteaus) many neologisms do incorporate the combination of words in a slightly incorrect fashion.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.67192-1006958</guid>
  	<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 15:52:00 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>googly</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: tiny crocodile</title>
  	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/67192/How-to-define-this-language-mistake#1006960</link>	
  	<description>My best portmanteau word: &lt;b&gt;Spontanimosity!&lt;/b&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Describes the experience of meeting and instantly disliking someone.  I didn&apos;t coin it but I knew the gal who did.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.67192-1006960</guid>
  	<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 15:52:39 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>tiny crocodile</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: clh</title>
  	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/67192/How-to-define-this-language-mistake#1006961</link>	
  	<description>I immediately thought Sniglet as well. Especially in the case of &amp;quot;flustrated,&amp;quot; as I have heard that word used.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.67192-1006961</guid>
  	<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 15:53:57 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>clh</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: mosk</title>
  	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/67192/How-to-define-this-language-mistake#1006962</link>	
  	<description>Hmmm...for words intended to be used only once or twice, perhaps &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nonce_word&quot;&gt;nonce word&lt;/a&gt; might be an apt description. If the word has legs (&amp;quot;e.g., &amp;quot;truthiness&amp;quot;), it may be a &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nonce_word&quot;&gt;neologism&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.67192-1006962</guid>
  	<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 15:54:25 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>mosk</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: Infinite Jest</title>
  	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/67192/How-to-define-this-language-mistake#1006966</link>	
  	<description>And of course Colemanballs: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colemanballs</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.67192-1006966</guid>
  	<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 15:57:40 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>Infinite Jest</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: juv3nal</title>
  	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/67192/How-to-define-this-language-mistake#1007040</link>	
  	<description>It&apos;s much, much more portmanteau than malapropism. malapropism suggests that the person saying it has made a mistake whereas something like flustrated or misconscrewed sounds deliberate.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.67192-1007040</guid>
  	<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 17:04:55 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>juv3nal</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: The Esteemed Doctor Bunsen Honeydew</title>
  	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/67192/How-to-define-this-language-mistake#1007083</link>	
  	<description>@tiny crocodile&lt;br&gt;
 my best portmanteau word (that I coined): &lt;b&gt;Heathengelical&lt;/b&gt;. &lt;br&gt;
(coined in reference to Richard Dawkins, but since come to mean any rabid atheist)&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
To answer the OP: It&apos;s not really anything directly, I don&apos;t think. I like ludwig_van&apos;s idea of making a portmanteau of portmanteau and malapropism to describe it.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.67192-1007083</guid>
  	<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 17:33:58 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>The Esteemed Doctor Bunsen Honeydew</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: argybarg</title>
  	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/67192/How-to-define-this-language-mistake#1007086</link>	
  	<description>Douglas Hofstadter is a fan of these particular kinds of errors, and claims to have an index-card file of thousands. He discusses some of his many examples in &lt;a href=&quot;http://vodreal.stanford.edu/shc/hofst/060206.ram&quot;&gt;this video&lt;/a&gt; (realvideo link), which is fascinating all the way through.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.67192-1007086</guid>
  	<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 17:35:24 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>argybarg</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: scarabic</title>
  	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/67192/How-to-define-this-language-mistake#1007087</link>	
  	<description>Hm. Maybe. Those examples are kinda clever sounding but it seems the asker is thinking of occasions where the person has made an unintentional mistake, not a bon mot.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
If intentional, I think the simplest word to define some of these is pun. &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
If unintentional, malapropism will do. I don&apos;t know of a specialized word for this kind of mistake.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.67192-1007087</guid>
  	<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 17:35:31 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>scarabic</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: argybarg</title>
  	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/67192/How-to-define-this-language-mistake#1007092</link>	
  	<description>And I would doubt that flustrated is actually intentional -- people cough up these sorts of errors mostly as errors (a sort of linguistic short circuit) and not Joycean blends or neologisms (which are intentional).</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.67192-1007092</guid>
  	<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 17:37:32 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>argybarg</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: limeonaire</title>
  	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/67192/How-to-define-this-language-mistake#1007093</link>	
  	<description>Yeah, I immediately thought &amp;quot;neologism.&amp;quot; &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;small&gt;My favorite (which some nice people credited me with coining): &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.langmaker.com/db/Tragesty&quot;&gt;Tragesty&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/small&gt;</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.67192-1007093</guid>
  	<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 17:37:52 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>limeonaire</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: Faint of Butt</title>
  	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/67192/How-to-define-this-language-mistake#1007110</link>	
  	<description>I would have said &amp;quot;portmanteau,&amp;quot; but ludwig_van wins. It&apos;s a malamanteau from now on as far as I&apos;m concerned. And as far as examples go, I can&apos;t believe nobody&apos;s mentioned the most famous malamanteau yet: &amp;quot;misunderestimate.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Incidentally, my wife invented a malamanteau today: &amp;quot;exorberant.&amp;quot; It describes something on which you gleefully spend far too much money.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.67192-1007110</guid>
  	<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 17:51:19 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>Faint of Butt</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: iamkimiam</title>
  	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/67192/How-to-define-this-language-mistake#1007115</link>	
  	<description>Here is one of my favorite portmanpropisms:&lt;br&gt;
Sarcurious  when somebody takes a tone that is both sarcastic and curious, likely because they are defensive about not understanding the previous statement.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.67192-1007115</guid>
  	<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 17:53:43 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>iamkimiam</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: Faint of Butt</title>
  	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/67192/How-to-define-this-language-mistake#1007120</link>	
  	<description>Oh, and limeonaire, back in college my circle of friends had a similar word, but taken further: a &lt;i&gt;traumajesty&lt;/i&gt; is a situation that is, simultaneously, a tragedy, a travesty and a trauma, but brings all of these conditions to majestic new heights.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.67192-1007120</guid>
  	<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 17:57:18 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>Faint of Butt</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: oneirodynia</title>
  	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/67192/How-to-define-this-language-mistake#1007137</link>	
  	<description>A great malamanteau I heard a few months ago was &amp;quot;overflowded&amp;quot;.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.67192-1007137</guid>
  	<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 18:14:12 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>oneirodynia</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: not that girl</title>
  	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/67192/How-to-define-this-language-mistake#1007224</link>	
  	<description>Again, not quite it, but something like an &lt;a href=&quot;http://eggcorns.lascribe.net/&quot;  _blank&gt;eggcorn&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
If anybody knows the name of this, I bet the guys at &lt;a href=&quot;http://itre.cis.upenn.edu/%7Emyl/languagelog/&quot;  _blank&gt;Language Log&lt;/a&gt; do.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.67192-1007224</guid>
  	<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 19:39:44 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>not that girl</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: BlackLeotardFront</title>
  	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/67192/How-to-define-this-language-mistake#1007304</link>	
  	<description>My favorite is &amp;quot;Ambiviolence,&amp;quot; as in, &amp;quot;who should I kill?!&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;
I&apos;d go with Portmanteau.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.67192-1007304</guid>
  	<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 21:05:32 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>BlackLeotardFront</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: iamkimiam</title>
  	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/67192/How-to-define-this-language-mistake#1007317</link>	
  	<description>Oh, another neologism that hasn&apos;t been mentioned yet, but is related is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.answers.com/topic/folk-etymology&quot;&gt;folk/false etymology&lt;/a&gt;, when a word or phrase takes on a new pronounciation based on a misunderstanding or misinterpretation of its origin. Popular folk etymologies are &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bartleby.com/68/73/2573.html&quot;&gt;woodchuck&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blunderbuss&quot;&gt;blunderbuss&lt;/a&gt;, and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wisegeek.com/what-is-folk-etymology.htm&quot;&gt;history&lt;/a&gt;. Folk etymology isn&apos;t quite the term you&apos;re looking for though, because that presupposes that the word has become mainstream and that people have misunderstood its origins. But it&apos;s loosely related.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.67192-1007317</guid>
  	<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 21:28:26 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>iamkimiam</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: po</title>
  	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/67192/How-to-define-this-language-mistake#1007408</link>	
  	<description>&lt;small&gt;limeonaire - okay, you may be getting credit for tragesty, but I&apos;ve got tragitastic!&lt;/small&gt;</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.67192-1007408</guid>
  	<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 00:48:00 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>po</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: rob511</title>
  	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/67192/How-to-define-this-language-mistake#1008553</link>	
  	<description>Neither precisely fish (portmanteau) nor fowl (malapropism), the only possible name for such lexical chimeras&lt;/i&gt; (e.g., &lt;i&gt;craptacular, fugly, manscaping&lt;/i&gt;) is&lt;b&gt; portapropis.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Indeed, like its eponym the movable loo, &lt;a href=&quot;http://abclocal.go.com/wpvi/story?section=bizarre&amp;id=5481153&quot;&gt;the rarest offer relief and horror in equal measures.&lt;/a&gt;</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.67192-1008553</guid>
  	<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 23:16:48 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>rob511</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: Reggie Digest</title>
  	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/67192/How-to-define-this-language-mistake#1008738</link>	
  	<description>Bushism.  &amp;quot;Misunderestimate,&amp;quot; anyone?</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.67192-1008738</guid>
  	<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 06:52:40 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>Reggie Digest</dc:creator>
</item>

    </channel>
</rss>
