<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

      <title>Comments on: How to get a simple VPN set up without using standard ports?</title>
      <link>http://ask.metafilter.com/66686/How-to-get-a-simple-VPN-set-up-without-using-standard-ports/</link>
      <description>Comments on Ask MetaFilter post How to get a simple VPN set up without using standard ports?</description>
	  	  <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 15:29:55 -0800</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 15:29:55 -0800</lastBuildDate>
      <language>en-us</language>
	  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	  <ttl>60</ttl>

<item>
  	<title>Question: How to get a simple VPN set up without using standard ports?</title>
  	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/66686/How-to-get-a-simple-VPN-set-up-without-using-standard-ports</link>	
  	<description>Trying to set up a VPN at a managed office where a third party manages connectivity with an iron fist. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; I currently work for a company that has offices with Regus. &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
The company wants to go multi-site and link their systems together via the internet - so I figure VPN is the solution (I am somewhat new at this but comfortable with most technical things).&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
The problem I&apos;m having is that Regus offer internet connectivity, but for VPN passthrough they want to charge a collassal monthly fee to enable this facility. They do however allow the opening of specific ports, but I think specifying the ones used for VPN would obviously make them want to charge the collassal amounts.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I&apos;ve looked into Hamachi but the 5.x.x.x IP addresses confuse me somewhat, and although performing actions like pinging hosts works ok, I&apos;d rather have it so a remote user would be part of the same subnet, even if it&apos;s via some tunnelling software adapter so the server would be 192.168.16.2 and the client over VPN would be 192.168.16.xxx (DHCP).&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Is there any solution anyone can think of where I can specify ports to tunnel VPN over on the sly reliably and easily? Does anyone know a good software solution.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Ideally I&apos;d like it that someone on the other end could turn on their PC connected to a router, and login transparantly to the Windows Domain in the main office without having to do anything.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Thanks in advance!</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">post:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.66686</guid>
  	<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 15:10:43 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>rc55</dc:creator>
	
	<category>windows</category>
	
	<category>server</category>
	
	<category>router</category>
	
	<category>vpn</category>
	
	<category>internet</category>
	
	<category>routing</category>
	
	<category>subnet</category>
	
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: iamabot</title>
  	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/66686/How-to-get-a-simple-VPN-set-up-without-using-standard-ports#1000259</link>	
  	<description>IPsec uses ip protocol 50, tcp 10000 (optional) and udp 500 and 4500.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
You can (probably) get away with a somewhat nifty ssh tunnel, either tunneling the traffic directly or, in a more interesting set up, tunneling the ipsec traffic through the ssh tunnel.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I&apos;ve never tried it personally, but if they won&apos;t open the ports try ssh tunneling.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.66686-1000259</guid>
  	<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 15:29:55 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>iamabot</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: rc55</title>
  	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/66686/How-to-get-a-simple-VPN-set-up-without-using-standard-ports#1000336</link>	
  	<description>Could this be acheived with the Windows version of OpenVPN?</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.66686-1000336</guid>
  	<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 16:29:45 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>rc55</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: uandt</title>
  	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/66686/How-to-get-a-simple-VPN-set-up-without-using-standard-ports#1000801</link>	
  	<description>Openvpn running on any platform can solve your problems.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
There a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;client=firefox-a&amp;rls=com.ubuntu%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&amp;q=openvpn+bridge+networks&amp;btnG=S%C3%B6k&amp;meta=&quot;&gt;many&lt;/a&gt; howtos out there on how to bridge networks with openvpn and hopefully one of them is right for you.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.66686-1000801</guid>
  	<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 05:26:32 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>uandt</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: chairface</title>
  	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/66686/How-to-get-a-simple-VPN-set-up-without-using-standard-ports#1000935</link>	
  	<description>You could also try treating an SSH tunnel as a routable link via PPP which would avoid VPN altogether. See &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.semicomplete.com/articles/ppp-over-ssh/&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.66686-1000935</guid>
  	<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 08:27:01 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>chairface</dc:creator>
</item>

    </channel>
</rss>
