<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

      <title>Comments on: Curious behavior of a micro-sd card</title>
      <link>http://ask.metafilter.com/62569/Curious-behavior-of-a-microsd-card/</link>
      <description>Comments on Ask MetaFilter post Curious behavior of a micro-sd card</description>
	  	  <pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 10:17:52 -0800</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 10:17:52 -0800</lastBuildDate>
      <language>en-us</language>
	  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	  <ttl>60</ttl>

<item>
  	<title>Question: Curious behavior of a micro-sd card</title>
  	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/62569/Curious-behavior-of-a-microsd-card</link>	
  	<description>Odd problem with a micro-sd card. I was writing +-400 files to the root of it  (under winxp) when after +- 10x files I got a &quot;remove write protection&quot; error , I couldn&apos;t write more files to card. I moved all of them to another just-made folder in the card. Now I can add more files, but the transfer rate has dropped from a good +-1000 KBs to +- 150KBs. What the.. ?</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">post:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.62569</guid>
  	<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 09:48:21 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>elpapacito</dc:creator>
	
	<category>micro-sd</category>
	
	<category>secure-digital</category>
	
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: unixrat</title>
  	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/62569/Curious-behavior-of-a-microsd-card#941906</link>	
  	<description>Sounds like your card is flawed or has reached it&apos;s read/write limit.  Flash is not limitless like (theoretically) RAM/magnetic hard drives.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
The OS may be decreasing the transfer rate to manage error handling.  Get a new card.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.62569-941906</guid>
  	<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 10:17:52 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>unixrat</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: elpapacito</title>
  	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/62569/Curious-behavior-of-a-microsd-card#941983</link>	
  	<description>it&apos;s brand new and as we speak I tried  to copy again and reached 1400KBs ...it&apos;s &amp;quot;a mistery&amp;quot;</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.62569-941983</guid>
  	<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 11:20:37 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>elpapacito</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: chrisroberts</title>
  	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/62569/Curious-behavior-of-a-microsd-card#942052</link>	
  	<description>A lot of this depends on the file system and such in use on the card, but it comes down to the fact that only a certain number of entries are allowed within the root directory. Another shining example of this can be seen by IOMEGA ZIP disks. I think their limit was 512 files or something like that, but there is no limit on the number of files in a subdirectory. There are lots of pages still out on the net explaining how to overcome this problem on zip disks.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
And you found out just how to do it. Create a directory and put everything in there.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.62569-942052</guid>
  	<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 12:01:20 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>chrisroberts</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: elpapacito</title>
  	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/62569/Curious-behavior-of-a-microsd-card#942071</link>	
  	<description>i didn&apos;t remember about any limit in root..anyway it seems plausible given the zip behavior. Thanks for help</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.62569-942071</guid>
  	<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 12:13:06 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>elpapacito</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: Kadin2048</title>
  	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/62569/Curious-behavior-of-a-microsd-card#942249</link>	
  	<description>The card is probably formatted as FAT16. From Wikipedia:&lt;blockquote&gt;The number of root directory entries available is set at formatting time, the number is stored in a 16 bit signed field setting an absolute limit of 32767 entries (32736, a multiple of 32, in practice). For historical reasons, FAT12 and FAT16 media generally use 512 root directory entries on non-floppy media, and other sizes may be incompatible with some software or devices (entries being file and/or folder names in the old 8.3 format).[2] Some third party tools like mkdosfs allow the user to set this parameter.&lt;/blockquote&gt;Source: &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File_Allocation_Table&quot;&gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File_Allocation_Table&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Maybe the card is formatted with a very low maximum number of root directory entries? Anyway, I think issues like this are one of the reasons why most digital cameras store their files in folders rather than dumping them on the root level of the storage card -- due to the design of FAT, odd things can happen when you do.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.62569-942249</guid>
  	<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 14:18:45 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>Kadin2048</dc:creator>
</item>

    </channel>
</rss>
