Ontario Tenants Filter: i'm in a weird situation with a rental
apartment- my landlord is trying to sell the building and is making
strange requests. i can't make sense of the ontario tenants' act.
your 2 cents would be very much appreciated.
BACKGROUND INFO:
i moved in to a 3-brdm toronto apartment 66 months ago.
back in 2001, me and my original 2 roommates signed a 1-year lease.
never renewed it.
in the past 5.5 years, i've had 7 roommates ranging in stay from 3
months to 3 years. each has paid a "last month's rent" deposit (ie,
paid 2 months of rent at the same time upon moving in). every time
roommates have come and gone, they've used their "last month's rent"
in lieu of rent for the last month they lived here, and the new tenant
came in immediately after, paying first-and-last. there has never
been a vacant room, and we've never been short on rent except 6 times
when a "last-month's-rent" was being "spent"- in those cases, it was
immediately replenished by the end of that month. we've always
assumed full responsibility for finding new tenants, and they've all
been pretty good tenants.
my current roommates moved in 11 and 4 months ago.
we're obviously good tenants and we're reliable on rent. we are 3
quiet, clean, responsible & friendly young professionals, and our apt
is in great shape- we're the kind of people most landlords would
immediately trust.
currently there's no lease, but a verbal agreement with the landlord
to stay here until "at least sept 2007". we kind of want to stay til
winter 2007, but we're all a bit loose on our ideal end date.
my landlord (let's call him Shady) is not trustworthy. he has
compromised our physical safety with poor upkeep, he tells
half-truths, avoids calls, often shows up unnanounced and makes us
late for work, pretends to speak less english than he does, and
generally plays dumb. he also has a bad temper and is unreasonable.
we've fought in the past; now we're mutually polite but it's volatile.
CURRENT SITUATION:
Shady has buyers interested my building, and has made 2 odd requests:
that me and my roommates sign a lease together, and that we take back
5.5 years of interest at 6% from our intial deposit on the apartment.
i've looked at the
ontario residential tenancies act but it's greek to me.
here are the questions i have. advice much appreciated. what am i missing?
1. TO LEASE OR NOT TO LEASE?
Shady wants me & my roommates to sign a lease together, binding the
three of us to a finite timeline. he says that having us on a lease
will make the building more attractive to potential buyers. is this
true? will they really care? remember, we are *obviously* good
tenants, and the building is selling for a pretty good value- i don't
think a lack of lease in 1 of the 6 apartments will make or break the
deal- am i wrong? can Shady force us to sign a lease?
2. CAN WE GET KICKED OUT BY THE NEW OWNERS?
does the new landlord have to honour the lease? if we don't sign the
lease, what are our rights? our apt is the nicest in the building, so
if a new owner wanted to live here or install family members, for sure
this is the apt they'd choose. will a lease will protect us from
this?
3. SHOULD WE ACCEPT THE INTEREST FROM THE 2001 RENTAL DEPOSIT?
Shady wants to refund the interest from our original deposit from way
back in 2001-- a total sum of about $600. he has never paid us annual
interest as apparently landlords are supposed to-- we never asked for
it.
me and my current roommates are happy to split the money (which is 33%
unquestionable mine, and 66% composed of interest accrued on the
deposits of my two original roommates, who are long gone).
but will we just have to pay that deposit money it right back to the
new landlord?
why would Shady-the-cheapskate volunteer to refund this money?
is there some loophole he's exploiting?
will we owe our new landlord a deposit? does this change if we do or
don't collect the interest on the old deposit from Shady?
4. WHAT SHOULD WE DO?
advice that will placate and reassure Shady is especially appreciated.
thanks so much for your advice.
Anyway, as I understand it (IANAL), if your lease has expired and not been renewed, you are currently renting the apartment on a month-to-month basis. You can get kicked out on short notice at any time. Signing a lease would be a good thing, AFAICT (did I mention IANAL? :-)
AFAIK, the new landlord would be bound by the lease in the same way that your current landlord would be, and could break the lease for the same reasons that your current landlord can (it is my understanding that wanting to use the property for themselves is one of the possible valid reasons for ending the lease -- again, talk to a lawyer for the details)
In real estate ads advertising rental properties for sale, the fact that leases are in place is featured prominently so it seems to be a selling point.
posted by winston at 9:03 PM on April 28, 2007