Comments on: Examples of Companies Inappropriately Editing Their Wikipedia Page?

Question: Examples of Companies Inappropriately Editing Their Wikipedia Page?

jmprice — Wed, 18 Apr 2007 10:56:14 -0800

Can you give me examples of companies that have tried to remove controversial information from their Wikipedia profile?

Hi everyone, previously I asked for examples of companies that had tried to use social media/user-generated content with unexpected results. The feedback was great.

I'm here for a followup:
Can you give me examples of companies that have tried to remove controversial (but relevant and factual) information from their Wikipedia profile?

A good example of this is the Wikipedia page for the NIH's National Institute on Drug Abuse. NIDA officials edited their page to remove links critical of their policies. Wikipedians discovered the editing and now NIDA's Wikipedia page mentions that NIDA officials previously attempted to remove criticism.

I can also remember that Congressional offices have gotten into trouble over editing Congress member's pages.

Can you think of other examples?

By: Burhanistan

Burhanistan — Wed, 18 Apr 2007 11:31:37 -0800

While the inappropriateness was debatable, Microsoft got some bad press about doing this a few months back.

By: iviken

iviken — Wed, 18 Apr 2007 11:35:38 -0800

SCO ?

By: caddis

caddis — Wed, 18 Apr 2007 11:42:54 -0800

Congressional staffers?

By: grouse

grouse — Wed, 18 Apr 2007 11:43:32 -0800

A person who claims to work for Bryan Adams (and who seems to be able to change his official web site) has repeatedly tried to remove various tidbits such as bands he used to be in before his career took off (which she seems to believe are now making money off of his likeness), references to unauthorized biographies, and other things.

By: Count

Count — Wed, 18 Apr 2007 13:21:13 -0800

Landmark Forum

By: lalex

lalex — Wed, 18 Apr 2007 13:44:09 -0800

Online retailer Overstock.com, home of semi-infamous CEO Patrick Byrne, has been accused of tampering with the company's Wikipedia page.

For more details, this post looks like a good starting point.

By: DevilsAdvocate

DevilsAdvocate — Wed, 18 Apr 2007 14:28:04 -0800

Wikipedia Conflict of Interest Noticeboard and archives. Most of the entries there are for addition of information inappropriate to Wikipedia, but if you browse through them you come across instances of inappropriate deletion of information as well.

By: mysterious1der

mysterious1der — Wed, 18 Apr 2007 14:38:05 -0800

As Burhanistan pointed out, inappropriateness can be quite subjective, but the university where I work finds its faculty and students constantly reverting each others edits.
Example1
Example2

By: drstein

drstein — Thu, 19 Apr 2007 14:11:06 -0800

The Wikipedia page for Burning Man has a LOT of edits, and 'controversial' information is added & removed. The Talk Page for it is also one of the longest ones I've seen in quite a while.

I say 'controversial' because exactly what is 'controversial' can be quite subjective.