<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: How do I antialias scanned TIFF images?</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/59763/How-do-I-antialias-scanned-TIFF-images/</link>
	<description>Comments on Ask MetaFilter post How do I antialias scanned TIFF images?</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 09:08:38 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 09:08:38 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Question: How do I antialias scanned TIFF images?</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/59763/How-do-I-antialias-scanned-TIFF-images</link>	
		<description>Scanning a book and converting to a PDF - how do I antialias the scanned page images? &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; I&apos;m in the process of scanning a long-out-of-print book and making it into a PDF.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I&apos;ve scanned the pages as 300dpi 1-bit B&amp;amp;W TIFF files.  When viewed in Preview or Acrobat Reader (which have &quot;antialias&quot; features), they look great.  When I look at them with Foxit Reader or xPDF, the pages look rough and &quot;jaggy&quot;.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
My question - is there a software filter or effect that I can apply to the TIFF files (even if I have to make the result 4 or 8-bit grayscale instead of B&amp;amp;W) that will give me the same effect without having to depend on the PDF viewer application?&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Some sample images:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Introduction (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mrbill.net/askmefi/introduction.tif&quot;&gt;TIFF&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mrbill.net/askmefi/introduction.gif&quot;&gt;GIF&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
Page 91 (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mrbill.net/askmefi/page091.tif&quot;&gt;TIFF&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mrbill.net/askmefi/page091.gif&quot;&gt;GIF&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I&apos;ve looked at ImageMagick, but it apparently will only antialias images when converting PostScript or vector image formats into bitmaps.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
(The reason for my efforts is that there is still a demand for the book - originally priced $15.95 in 1981, used copies now go for anywhere from $40 to $400.  This is being done with the full permission of the author/copyright holder, who will make the book available for download on his website.)</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:ask.metafilter.com,2007:site.59763</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 08:50:31 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mrbill</dc:creator>
		
			<category>pdf</category>
		
			<category>antialias</category>
		
			<category>book</category>
		
			<category>scanning</category>
		
			<category>archival</category>
		
	</item> <item>
		<title>By: cortex</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/59763/How-do-I-antialias-scanned-TIFF-images#898936</link>	
		<description>The difficulty is in scaling for display&amp;mdash;if you want to display scaled-down images with nice anti-aliasing, you&apos;re married to a viewer that supports that as a display-time feature, period.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
What you can do is batch-process your source images to create scaled-down-with-antialiasing display images, and there are plenty of applications that can do that for you for $nil-to-free.  However, that will only work if you can be satisfied with a specific set of fixed resolutions (e.g. 400px wide, 600px wide, etc) to use as your display format.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2007:site.59763-898936</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 09:08:38 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cortex</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: mrbill</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/59763/How-do-I-antialias-scanned-TIFF-images#898957</link>	
		<description>It appears that doing a very slight &quot;blur&quot; filter in Photoshop to one of the TIFF images (after converting to grayscale) does something similar to what I&apos;m looking for.  Unfortunately, of course this increases the file size by almost 10x, and would have to be automated (with ~300 pages).&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Cortex, if you&apos;ve got suggestions for the scaling-with-antialiasing applications please let me know what you have in mind.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2007:site.59763-898957</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 09:19:46 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mrbill</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: smackfu</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/59763/How-do-I-antialias-scanned-TIFF-images#898961</link>	
		<description>Oh, you have Photoshop?  Just use a size ratio of 2 when you convert to grayscale.  You&apos;ll end up with 150 dpi anti-aliased files.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
And you can automate anything in Photoshop.  Look at the batch options on the File menu.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2007:site.59763-898961</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 09:25:27 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>smackfu</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: cortex</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/59763/How-do-I-antialias-scanned-TIFF-images#898965</link>	
		<description>The beloved-and-maligned &lt;a href=&quot;http://gimp.org/&quot;&gt;GIMP&lt;/a&gt; has long been my standby.  Free, easy install, and the interface is non-bizarre these days.  Maybe be a little heavier than your specific needs, but it&apos;ll work.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I got a free copy of Photoshop Elements recently with a hardware purchase, and it&apos;s been a dream for simple batch jobs.  Don&apos;t know what it retails at.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Having wrestled with ImageMagick more than once, I&apos;ll say that it&apos;s never been painless but I&apos;ve always gotten it to do what I wanted.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
But it sounds like you have access to Photoshop itself already?  In which case a batch-process applying either the slight-blur thing to the at-size images, like you reference, or just doing a resize/resample with bilinear filtering or similar would work well.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Is file size an issue?  Reducing the resolution to 150-100 dpi will probably leave you with a document perfectly usable for screen-reading, though if your intent is to let people actually print this thing they may be dissatisfied with the output on paper.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2007:site.59763-898965</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 09:27:09 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cortex</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: fake</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/59763/How-do-I-antialias-scanned-TIFF-images#898997</link>	
		<description>You have &lt;strong&gt;*really*&lt;/strong&gt; nice scans. I&apos;m going to suggest you find a copy of an OCR program like ABBY FineReader, which does an absolutely incredible job with images scanned as well as these. It will even preserve paragraph flow around images. &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
That will solve your scaling problem, and greatly reduce filesizes. It will also make it possible to convert it to all kinds of other formats. &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
If you want to talk about this software more, please email me, email is on my website which is in my profile.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2007:site.59763-898997</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 09:44:59 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>fake</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: fake</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/59763/How-do-I-antialias-scanned-TIFF-images#899016</link>	
		<description>Just to prove that OCR is going to do a great job with these scans, I ran your scan through &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.simpleocr.com/Demo/ocrimage.asp&quot;&gt;SimpleOCR&lt;/a&gt;, a web-based service. While this in no way competes with FineReader, which will preserve your page layout appearance, it should give you an idea of the accuracy available on even bottom-end, free services.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2007:site.59763-899016</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 09:49:47 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>fake</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: mrbill</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/59763/How-do-I-antialias-scanned-TIFF-images#899024</link>	
		<description>Fake, this book has a huge amount of images and diagrams but I&apos;ll check out FineReader - it looks like they have a 15-day free trial which would be adequate for this project.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2007:site.59763-899024</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 09:54:17 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mrbill</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: anaelith</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/59763/How-do-I-antialias-scanned-TIFF-images#899026</link>	
		<description>Using GIMP, &lt;a href=&quot;http://home.att.net/~gamma_ray/page091.png&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; is what I ended up with (picture will be up for a day or two, but probably not forever)...anyway, you&apos;ll note that the file size is 69.3 KB to the original 56.4 KB--my experiments suggest that this is the lowest you&apos;re going to get going from large-but-two-bit images to small-but-fuzzy (for example, when I just blurred and scaled down, the image size was, as you suggest, quite a bit larger).&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Process:&lt;br&gt;
1 px horizontal, 2 px vertical Gaussian blur&lt;br&gt;
scale image: 11 inches across (adjust as you like), 72 dpi, cubic interpolation (this is important)&lt;br&gt;
reduce colour depth to a 16 bit indexed &quot;optimum&quot; palette&lt;br&gt;
save as PNG, maximum compression&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
This process should be easy to automate, although you&apos;ll probably prefer to do so using PhotoShop so I&apos;ll spare you the details.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2007:site.59763-899026</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 09:54:55 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>anaelith</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
