Comments on: What makes twitter so great?

Question: What makes twitter so great?

deansfurniture5 — Thu, 15 Mar 2007 19:17:23 -0800

What makes twitter so great?

Recently, twitter has been showing up everywhere, so I signed up for an account, but I guess I just don't get it. What's the big deal?

By: strangeleftydoublethink

strangeleftydoublethink — Thu, 15 Mar 2007 19:33:50 -0800

Our Continuous Partial Attention disorder needed some fresh material for our ever-fracturing ability to focus on one thing.

I guess I could see it being useful if you had a gaggle of friends dispersed around a large metropolitan area and you wanted an easy way to know what everyone was doing at any given moment.

By: k8t

k8t — Thu, 15 Mar 2007 19:47:47 -0800

For me it started with the Facebook update notification and the "what I'm up to" bar in GChat.

I added Twitter as a "friend" in GChat and I can put my updates right in there.

By: vacapinta

vacapinta — Thu, 15 Mar 2007 20:07:06 -0800

I'm as skeptical as you, having no need to track what all my friends are having for lunch. Then again, I dont have a myspace page either.

However, here's a post from Laughing Squid that shows how this might be useful. Its basically SMS Multicast. In most cases its fairly annoying but there are limited uses, I suppose.

By: Matt Oneiros

Matt Oneiros — Thu, 15 Mar 2007 20:11:34 -0800

The edginess, the innovation. The leading edge of dissolution of "privacy" it symbolizes.

Personally I'm not too impressed, it seems more like a proof of concept than an application unto itself.

It's saving grace being it's sufficient API (which will ultimately make it possible to build larger, more useful and far more intriguing applications on top of it -- presumably). But I can't say I'm a big fan of developing a module as an application and praying it is seen as useful by future creators.

By: rmm

rmm — Thu, 15 Mar 2007 20:15:49 -0800

I too am in the 'scratches head, wonders why anyone would use this' camp. There are some interesting comments in a thread by Rich Ziade over at basement.org - the link goes to the aforementioned post. I like Rich's comments - "Unless we're coordinating fighting a brush fire or something...I just don't see it". It's interesting to see how this affects society from a ubicomp perspective and interesting uses and hacks for it, but unless people are that desperate for social affirmation - why would you use it?

By: k8t

k8t — Thu, 15 Mar 2007 20:20:09 -0800

Another feature I liked - during the Oscars LOTS of strangers were all watching "with me" - I kept my eye on the Twitter public feed and everyone was saying things like "Man, that's an ugly dress" or "Yay! Al Gore!" and there were conversations of sorts - when the iPhone ad aired, everyone cheered. Then someone asked, via their Twitter, "Is it on Youtube yet?" to which someone else replied "putting it up now."

It was surreal and awesome.

By: boo_radley

boo_radley — Thu, 15 Mar 2007 20:31:21 -0800

It's a blog with "an angle".

By: justgary

justgary — Thu, 15 Mar 2007 20:49:57 -0800

It does one very small thing, does it well, and is free. I just use it to keep track of a couple of friends and as a kind of running diary. It also fits nicely on the side of your website if you choose.

Yes, a lot of it is hype, and I find it funny when someone has 500 people getting a text message that says "I'm bored". It's also been slow as hell lately and they really don't seem too concerned. I can go to evhead.com and wait 5 minutes for the site to load, and he helped create the damn thing. But, it is free.

The thing is, it's very flexible. So while this:

everyone was saying things like "Man, that's an ugly dress" or "Yay! Al Gore!" and there were conversations of sorts - when the iPhone ad aired, everyone cheered. Then someone asked, via their Twitter, "Is it on Youtube yet?" to which someone else replied "putting it up now."

is pretty much the opposite of awesome to me, you can choose to do with it what you want, which, for me, is something on a very small scale. A nice little tool if you will.

By: davidmsc

davidmsc — Thu, 15 Mar 2007 20:52:50 -0800

A brief lay-person analysis about Twitter here that you might find interesting.

By: shanevsevil

shanevsevil — Thu, 15 Mar 2007 20:59:19 -0800

I kinda get the sense that this is more popular with the people who blog 24/7 saying how great it is than it is with the people who read said blogs. Kinda like how people who blog about applications get all excited about new screen capture software, they're the main users.

By: stavrosthewonderchicken

stavrosthewonderchicken — Thu, 15 Mar 2007 21:19:45 -0800

SXSW.

By: pwally

pwally — Thu, 15 Mar 2007 23:42:13 -0800

I just signed up for an account and I put a badge on my website that updates what i'm doing. It is sort of my microblog. Not going to write a blog post about burning the popcorn, but I think that's twitter worthy. Also I have Robert Scoble, Steve Winer, Thomas Hawk, and even John Edwards as people who I follow their twitters. If your bored just add interesting friends. Also if you look at the public twitters page which has about ten new twitters every second there is some legitimately interesting/ humorous material (A person registered as Seinfeld twittered "Whats the deal with twitter?" and it made me chuckle). I saw it when it came out a couple months ago and saw no point in signing up, but now that its has a following I think it will be cool at least until it dies out (if it dies out). I have no expectations and I love to watch ideas like this come into fruition. Add me as a friend if you want: twitter.com/destroyer

By: jbickers

jbickers — Fri, 16 Mar 2007 03:17:55 -0800

Our Continuous Partial Attention disorder needed some fresh material for our ever-fracturing ability to focus on one thing.

Complete agreement here. My desire to go to a park, leaving cell phone and computer at home, increases in direct proportion to the number of social networking apps.

By: waxbanks

waxbanks — Fri, 16 Mar 2007 06:59:29 -0800

Only slightly joking: Have you read Robert Putnam's Bowling Alone? One of its broad critiques - that meaningful social glue is getting harder to find as civic institutions are replaced by individually-tailored affinity groups etc. - is at least gestured at by things like Twitter. But I imagine for most users it hurts more than it helps; it gives a false feeling of shared experience. (cf. above about Oscars-night 'get-together': could the bar be lowered any further than the goddamn Oscars?)

It's a message board for hipsters, right? An AIM 'away' message without the accessibility of AIM. In other words: you can tell your friends how you're doing, but you don't have to listen to them at all, and this is expected. An ego-gratifying sense of copresence without any of the social obligations that actual, y'know, proximity induces. It's Facebook for web designers, and the common defense that it 'does one thing and does it well' doesn't justify its built-in social limitations anymore than it justifies pornography's or heroin's.

Is the technology helpful? Theoretically, yeah. I can imagine the SXSW crowd using it to coordinate karaoke get-togethers and such. But if people were interested in active exchange, with structural requirements a bit more like those of actual copresence, we'd have seen a fourfold increase in IRC traffic during SXSW, instead. The only cost in Twitter is to the listener (you pay for others' squawking with your attention).

(And yeah, personally I'd love to see the grand return of IRC and Usenet, aesthetically challenged and with a little more friction, instead of the rise of cuteness like Twitter. But that's a purely personal preference.)

By: waxpancake

waxpancake — Fri, 16 Mar 2007 09:19:41 -0800

I have no interest in getting status messages about the people I know when I'm at work or hanging around the house. But at SXSW, where there was an intensely concentrated set of conflicting social activities in a small space, it wasn't only interesting -- it was invaluable. Knowing where the panels and parties my friends were at (or where they were en route) was insanely useful.

By: etoile

etoile — Fri, 16 Mar 2007 09:41:43 -0800

I got into Twitter from the Facebook status thing too. I was looking for a way to put my Facebook status on my website, and lo and behold Twitter was just starting up. Now I have a tiny line of code and everybody viewing my site can see what's happening. That's why I like it, YMMV.

By: pwally

pwally — Fri, 16 Mar 2007 12:59:56 -0800

Also another thing that I forgot to mention-> if you meet someone else at a conference like sxsw or barcampboston where it's likely that they will have a twitter account as well you can add them as a contact by text messaging "add *newfriendsname*" to 40404. Since I would not normally ever follow up with a new friend like this by calling them/emailing them then this seems like a much more removed way to stay in contact. Also imagine if twitter catches on to more non-web savvy people and you can add new love interests that you meet at the bar, much easier than calling? Although may be a cop-out. Either way its a new option.

By: terceiro

terceiro — Fri, 16 Mar 2007 18:44:44 -0800

Twitter is how my wife and I keep tabs on each other during the day. She's a stay-at-home mom, and I'm on campus teaching, etc. I write for an audience of one, because it's quicker than a phone call, and allows me to tell her basically how my day is flowing, and vice versa. If I read that she's "frustrated that Peter won't take his nap" I know before I dial.

Could we live without it? We seemed to be fine without twitter for more than twelve years of marriage. On the other hand, I think it's a handy tool. So it's handy, not indispensable.

By: phearlez

phearlez — Sat, 17 Mar 2007 09:08:22 -0800

While I don't get it, I only almost don't get it. I was really enthused when I thought it was a quickie status update what-I'm-up-to idea that someone would toss a marginally more detailed message into. Something like "Lately I'm all into answering ask.metafilter questions. http:///ask.metafilter.com" or "Researching Akita rescue charities to get involved in - rescue.that.eskimo.dog.example.com is awesome!"

Instead it's "on my way to the grocery store" or "shoe shopping" which I completely don't see the point to. If it was exclusively about where people were going for a pint at happy hour then I might care....

By: lunalaguna

lunalaguna — Sat, 17 Mar 2007 15:24:49 -0800

Thank you for asking this question! Indeed, people were shitting themselves over Twitter during SXSW Interactive. It came up nine times just in panels I visited. It's like a giant Twitter blob has covered Austin.

By: pzarquon

pzarquon — Tue, 20 Mar 2007 11:20:45 -0800

I really like the take in this post on Twitter. It's not so much the service itself but what it means.

What's happening is that we're learning to negotiate always-on connectivity. Some people are going to need more distance than others. Some are going to opt-out completely. But I think people who grow up with this sort of thing just take it for granted.

The whole "broadcast IM" doesn't appeal to me so much as the "presence" aspect. Twitter captured the buzz of the moment but there are lots of other services coming at it from different angles that I'm excited about.