<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: How do I make "Player(s)" a possessive?</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/57860/How-do-I-make-Players-a-possessive/</link>
	<description>Comments on Ask MetaFilter post How do I make "Player(s)" a possessive?</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 12:01:24 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 12:01:24 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Question: How do I make &quot;Player(s)&quot; a possessive?</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/57860/How-do-I-make-Players-a-possessive</link>	
		<description>How do you show possession in the case of an optional pluralisation? For example, if the word is player(s), would you write player(s)&apos;s? Player(s)&apos;? Player(&apos;s|s&apos;)?  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; If there are any regional rules for this, ie. British vs. American, it would be great if you could note this-- I may need to use both or neither.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:ask.metafilter.com,2007:site.57860</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 11:55:41 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>magacid</dc:creator>
		
			<category>grammar</category>
		
			<category>pluralisation</category>
		
	</item> <item>
		<title>By: mkultra</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/57860/How-do-I-make-Players-a-possessive#869594</link>	
		<description>I&apos;d suggest avoiding that messiness altogether and explicitly saying &quot;of the player(s)&quot; or &quot;belonging to the player(s)&quot;.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2007:site.57860-869594</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 12:01:24 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mkultra</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: googly</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/57860/How-do-I-make-Players-a-possessive#869597</link>	
		<description>How about punting by saying -&lt;strong&gt;one or more players&apos;&lt;/strong&gt;-?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2007:site.57860-869597</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 12:02:44 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>googly</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: occhiblu</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/57860/How-do-I-make-Players-a-possessive#869612</link>	
		<description>I would probably change it to &quot;each of the players&apos; X,&quot; if possible.  Just somehow get it all in the plural to avoid the &quot;(s)&quot; entirely.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2007:site.57860-869612</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 12:11:34 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>occhiblu</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: spicynuts</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/57860/How-do-I-make-Players-a-possessive#869634</link>	
		<description>There&apos;s an entire metatalk thread that started off about something else but devolved into a full on discussion of this, involving editors and others.  Might be worth trying to find.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2007:site.57860-869634</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 12:40:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>spicynuts</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: wheat</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/57860/How-do-I-make-Players-a-possessive#869644</link>	
		<description>I&apos;m with the others on avoiding the &quot;player(s)&quot; construction entirely by casting to the plural, if at all possible.  Once you throw possession into the mix, it gets difficult to parse (and impossible to say out loud.  Do you have some sample phrases you are considering?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2007:site.57860-869644</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 12:46:55 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>wheat</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: ijoshua</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/57860/How-do-I-make-Players-a-possessive#869645</link>	
		<description>I agree with mkultra.  The apostrophe is grammatical sugar, and when its use becomes cumbersome, you should fall back to more verbose phrase.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2007:site.57860-869645</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 12:47:32 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ijoshua</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: wheat</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/57860/How-do-I-make-Players-a-possessive#869646</link>	
		<description>* out loud).</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2007:site.57860-869646</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 12:47:36 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>wheat</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: iamkimiam</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/57860/How-do-I-make-Players-a-possessive#869700</link>	
		<description>The player(&apos;s)(s&apos;) girl.&lt;br&gt;
(Could mean the player has a girl, or a bunch of players collectively have a girl. weird either way.) &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I would try avoiding the construction altogether, since it results in a set of vaguely suggestive parenthesis. ;-)</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2007:site.57860-869700</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 13:21:41 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>iamkimiam</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: Kirth Gerson</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/57860/How-do-I-make-Players-a-possessive#869713</link>	
		<description>Since you asked what I would do - I would not have (s) in there in the first place. Probably do the same as &lt;a href=&quot;http://ask.metafilter.com/57860/How-do-I-make-Players-a-possessive#869597&quot;&gt;googly&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2007:site.57860-869713</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 13:30:04 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kirth Gerson</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: magacid</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/57860/How-do-I-make-Players-a-possessive#869834</link>	
		<description>I&apos;ve decided to agree with the majority here and rewrite the sentence. Since removing the parentheses aren&apos;t really an option, I&apos;ve phrased it similarly to mkulta&apos;s first suggestion. Thanks!</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2007:site.57860-869834</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 14:41:30 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>magacid</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: polyglot</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/57860/How-do-I-make-Players-a-possessive#869940</link>	
		<description>It is the &lt;em&gt;players&apos;&lt;/em&gt; stadium; implying that the players are plural and they collectively own a stadium.  At least, that&apos;s correct in Australia and therefore probably the UK.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2007:site.57860-869940</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 16:11:05 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>polyglot</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
