<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: Website that will create combinations?</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/56814/Website-that-will-create-combinations/</link>
	<description>Comments on Ask MetaFilter post Website that will create combinations?</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 06:13:17 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 06:13:17 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Question: Website that will create combinations?</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/56814/Website-that-will-create-combinations</link>	
		<description>I&apos;m working on a presentation for a public speaking class, and my chosen topic is group choice. Is there a website (or program) that I could use to generate all possible preference orderings for a specific set of preferences?  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; Or just numbers in general? It&apos;s not central to my presentation, but I&apos;d like to have a slide or two that I could use to demonstrate how many different sets of individual preferences are possible given a certain number of alternatives, in order to explain why group choice is such a difficult and interesting topic. Moreover, I&apos;d rather not go through and do all of the preference orderings/rankings by hand...</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:ask.metafilter.com,2007:site.56814</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 06:01:29 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>almostbarefoot</dc:creator>
		
			<category>preferenceordering</category>
		
			<category>combinations</category>
		
	</item> <item>
		<title>By: demiurge</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/56814/Website-that-will-create-combinations#854415</link>	
		<description>I think you&apos;re talking about &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Combinatorics&quot;&gt;combinatorics&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
If order is important, having 5 people choose 10 things leads to 5&lt;sup&gt;10&lt;/sup&gt; different combinations, or 9,765,625.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
This sounds suspiciously similar to what &lt;a href=&quot;http://ask.metafilter.com/56687/Balls-in-boxes-algorithm&quot;&gt;Davar&lt;/a&gt; was trying to do in a previous question.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2007:site.56814-854415</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 06:13:17 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>demiurge</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: Khalad</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/56814/Website-that-will-create-combinations#854477</link>	
		<description>If you&apos;re asking, how many different ways can I arrange a set of &lt;i&gt;n&lt;/i&gt; items, the answer is &lt;i&gt;n&lt;/i&gt;!. So if, for example, you were asked to rank five items from 1 to 5 in order of preference, there would be 5! = 5&amp;times;4&amp;times;3&amp;times;2&amp;times;1 = 120 ways you could rank those items.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Factorials become very large very quickly, so showing all possible combinations might be excessive. For example, 10! is 3,628,800.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2007:site.56814-854477</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 07:48:55 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Khalad</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: Rhomboid</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/56814/Website-that-will-create-combinations#855242</link>	
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mathsisfun.com/combinatorics/combinations-permutations-calculator.html&quot;&gt;Combinations and Permutations Calculator&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2007:site.56814-855242</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 22:10:13 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rhomboid</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
