<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: How do I see it ALL???</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/54830/How-do-I-see-it-ALL/</link>
	<description>Comments on Ask MetaFilter post How do I see it ALL???</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 09:37:42 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 09:37:42 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Question: How do I see it ALL???</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/54830/How-do-I-see-it-ALL</link>	
		<description>Google: Is there any way to see all 35k results for a search term in video.google.com instead of just the first 500 or so? At some point, clicking on the following page of results, Google yields a blank page.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:ask.metafilter.com,2007:site.54830</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 08:39:43 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Clementines4ever</dc:creator>
		
			<category>google</category>
		
			<category>video</category>
		
			<category>search</category>
		
	</item> <item>
		<title>By: MetaMonkey</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/54830/How-do-I-see-it-ALL#825740</link>	
		<description>Assuming this is a similar problem to the limit of ~1000 results to a normal google search (i.e. at google.com), the only known method is to refine your search by adding additional terms. So instead of searching for &quot;&apos;star trek&apos;&quot;, search for &quot;+&apos;star trek&apos; +spock&quot;.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
The theory is that google imposes a hard limit to save on processing.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2007:site.54830-825740</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 09:37:42 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MetaMonkey</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: alopez</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/54830/How-do-I-see-it-ALL#825810</link>	
		<description>&lt;i&gt;The theory is that google imposes a hard limit to save on processing.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
This is not a theory; it&apos;s a fact that computing the exact set of pages is an expensive computation (particularly for conjunctive/disjunctive search terms).  The reason that the first page of results on Google says &quot;Results 1 - 10 of &lt;i&gt;about&lt;/i&gt; 35,000 for foo&quot; is because the number 35,000 is an estimate, not an exact count.  In fact, computing better estimates is an active area of research at the search companies.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2007:site.54830-825810</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 10:29:48 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>alopez</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: Doofus Magoo</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/54830/How-do-I-see-it-ALL#825870</link>	
		<description>&lt;b&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;At some point, clicking on the following page of results, Google yields a blank page.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;That happens when you hit result #1001. There&apos;s no way to retrieve anything beyond their first 1,000 results, even using the API.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2007:site.54830-825870</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 11:20:48 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Doofus Magoo</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
