<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: Why "The Christ" Instead of "Christ" in "The Passion of the Christ"?</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/5475/Why-The-Christ-Instead-of-Christ-in-The-Passion-of-the-Christ/</link>
	<description>Comments on Ask MetaFilter post Why "The Christ" Instead of "Christ" in "The Passion of the Christ"?</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2004 08:25:18 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2004 08:25:18 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Question: Why &quot;The Christ&quot; Instead of &quot;Christ&quot; in &quot;The Passion of the Christ&quot;?</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/5475/Why-The-Christ-Instead-of-Christ-in-The-Passion-of-the-Christ</link>	
		<description>In the title &lt;i&gt;The Passion of the Christ&lt;/i&gt;, what is the significance of the second &apos;the&apos;? We don&apos;t go around around saying &apos;the Gibson&apos;, although I guess we do say &apos;the Donald&apos;.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:ask.metafilter.com,2004:site.5475</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2004 08:20:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mischief</dc:creator>
		
			<category>movies</category>
		
			<category>titles</category>
		
			<category>grammar</category>
		
	</item> <item>
		<title>By: Mick</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/5475/Why-The-Christ-Instead-of-Christ-in-The-Passion-of-the-Christ#116597</link>	
		<description>Christ is a title, it meens saviour. Jesus is &lt;em&gt;the Christ&lt;/em&gt;, if you are so inclined to believe.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2004:site.5475-116597</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2004 08:25:18 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mick</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: realityblurred</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/5475/Why-The-Christ-Instead-of-Christ-in-The-Passion-of-the-Christ#116598</link>	
		<description>This &lt;a href=&quot;http://slate.msn.com/id/2096041/&quot;&gt;Slate Explainer column&lt;/a&gt;, which explores why the film is called &quot;The Passion,&quot; also explains the &quot;the&quot;:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;But why the &quot;the&quot; in &quot;of the Christ&quot;? The moniker is a less common alternative to just plain Christ, which is a derivation of a Latin translation of a Greek translation of the Hebrew title Messiah, which means &quot;the Anointed.&quot; In the Geneva and 1611 versions of the New Testament, the word &quot;Christ&quot; is often preceded by the word &quot;the.&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2004:site.5475-116598</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2004 08:25:46 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>realityblurred</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: jpoulos</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/5475/Why-The-Christ-Instead-of-Christ-in-The-Passion-of-the-Christ#116599</link>	
		<description>Yeah, Mary and Joseph weren&apos;t Mr. and Mrs. Christ.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2004:site.5475-116599</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2004 08:26:45 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jpoulos</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: jmd82</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/5475/Why-The-Christ-Instead-of-Christ-in-The-Passion-of-the-Christ#116602</link>	
		<description>It also has to do with Christ being His &quot;role.&quot;  When people say Jesus Christ, it makes it sound like Christ is His last name.  Using &quot;The&quot; is meant as a way to seperate Christ from His name Jesus and puncuate the fact Jesus is &lt;i&gt;The&lt;/i&gt; Christ, kind of like how Bush is &lt;i&gt;The&lt;/i&gt; President of the US.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2004:site.5475-116602</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2004 08:46:11 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jmd82</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: languagehat</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/5475/Why-The-Christ-Instead-of-Christ-in-The-Passion-of-the-Christ#116610</link>	
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Christ is a title, it meens saviour.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
No, it means &apos;messiah&apos; (= &apos;anointed one&apos;), and if you mentally replace &quot;Christ&quot; with &quot;Messiah&quot; you&apos;ll see why &quot;the&quot; is used.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2004:site.5475-116610</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2004 08:58:36 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>languagehat</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: cyrusdogstar</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/5475/Why-The-Christ-Instead-of-Christ-in-The-Passion-of-the-Christ#116625</link>	
		<description>Snarky aside: if you have seen &lt;i&gt;Hackers&lt;/i&gt; recently, you &lt;b&gt;will&lt;/b&gt; go around saying &apos;the Gibson&apos;. As in &apos;hacking the Gibson&apos;. ;)</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2004:site.5475-116625</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2004 09:48:51 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cyrusdogstar</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: scarabic</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/5475/Why-The-Christ-Instead-of-Christ-in-The-Passion-of-the-Christ#116628</link>	
		<description>I thought that Christ was equivalent to &quot;The Crucified&quot; or &quot;He who was crucified&quot; or just &quot;Crucified.&quot; As jmd said, that&apos;s his role.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
As in: &lt;br&gt;
Jesus, Regional Manager.&lt;br&gt;
Jesus, FBI. &lt;br&gt;
Jesus, Actor/Director.&lt;br&gt;
Jesus, Christ.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Give these people 2000 years and they lose the comma.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2004:site.5475-116628</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2004 09:58:45 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>scarabic</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: emptybowl</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/5475/Why-The-Christ-Instead-of-Christ-in-The-Passion-of-the-Christ#116633</link>	
		<description>Not that is has anything to do with anything, but yesterday on the radio, Don and Mike were interviewing people about the movie, and were asking them which movie they thought would have more biblical significance: The Passion of The Christ or The Starskey and The Hutch. I just thought that was funny.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2004:site.5475-116633</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2004 10:29:36 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>emptybowl</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: jmd82</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/5475/Why-The-Christ-Instead-of-Christ-in-The-Passion-of-the-Christ#116668</link>	
		<description>scarabic:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
from m-w.com&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?book=Dictionary&amp;va=Christ&amp;x=0&amp;y=0&quot;&gt;Main Entry: Christ&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Pronunciation: &apos;krIst&lt;br&gt;
Function: noun&lt;br&gt;
Etymology: Middle English Crist, from Old English, from Latin Christus, from Greek Christos, literally, anointed, from chriein&lt;br&gt;
1 : MESSIAH&lt;br&gt;
2 : JESUS&lt;br&gt;
3 : an ideal type of humanity&lt;br&gt;
4 Christian Science : the ideal truth that comes as a divine manifestation of God to destroy incarnate error&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
The above definition had always been my defintion of what &quot;Christ&quot; actually means, from a Catholic perspective at least.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2004:site.5475-116668</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2004 12:10:29 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jmd82</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: scarabic</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/5475/Why-The-Christ-Instead-of-Christ-in-The-Passion-of-the-Christ#116681</link>	
		<description>huh...&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
So &quot;crucifix&quot; and &quot;christ&quot; are not related? Ya learn something every day...</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2004:site.5475-116681</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2004 12:58:09 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>scarabic</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: Vidiot</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/5475/Why-The-Christ-Instead-of-Christ-in-The-Passion-of-the-Christ#116687</link>	
		<description>Interesting.  I&apos;d always wondered why one of the Episcopalian Eucharistic prayers (which contained the line &quot;...put all things in subjection under your Christ&quot;) was phrased the way it was.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
(And I just looked up &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?book=Dictionary&amp;va=Chrism&quot;&gt;Chrism&lt;/a&gt;, the oil used in anointing ceremonies, and was suprised to find that its root is apparently from the word for &quot;ointment&quot;...I&apos;d have thought it came from the same root as &quot;Christ&quot;, given that its etymology is given as &quot;anointed&quot;, as in jmd82&apos;s and languagehat&apos;s posts above.  So &quot;Christ&quot; came from &quot;Chrism&quot;, not the other way around.)</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2004:site.5475-116687</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2004 13:16:17 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Vidiot</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: kindall</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/5475/Why-The-Christ-Instead-of-Christ-in-The-Passion-of-the-Christ#116715</link>	
		<description>&quot;Christ&quot; is to &quot;Jesus&quot; as &quot;Pooh&quot; is to &quot;Winnie.&quot;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2004:site.5475-116715</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2004 14:43:54 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kindall</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
