<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: corporations law</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/54336/corporations-law/</link>
	<description>Comments on Ask MetaFilter post corporations law</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 01:51:15 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 01:51:15 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Question: corporations law</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/54336/corporations-law</link>	
		<description>What is the difference between enjoining a transaction and setting aside a transaction? This is in the context of corporations law and conflicting interest transactions.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:ask.metafilter.com,2007:site.54336</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 22:42:31 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>KimikoPi</dc:creator>
		
			<category>law</category>
		
	</item> <item>
		<title>By: Mr. President Dr. Steve Elvis America</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/54336/corporations-law#818248</link>	
		<description>A transaction can be enjoined only before it is consummated, but it could be set aside afterward.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2007:site.54336-818248</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 01:51:15 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mr. President Dr. Steve Elvis America</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: ibmcginty</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/54336/corporations-law#818408</link>	
		<description>Mr. America has it.  &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
You seek an injunction to &lt;em&gt;prevent &lt;/em&gt;the sale before the fact; to get it, you need to prove whatever the three things are that you need to establish to get a preliminary injunction (probability of success on the merits, irreparable harm, and... something else, I think).  You set aside a transaction &lt;em&gt;after &lt;/em&gt;the fact, and that&apos;s where you&apos;re more likely to see a fuller treatment of conflict of interest issues.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2007:site.54336-818408</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 08:39:27 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ibmcginty</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
