<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: Windows XP</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/5407/Windows-XP/</link>
	<description>Comments on Ask MetaFilter post Windows XP</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2004 13:32:27 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2004 13:32:27 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Question: Windows XP</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/5407/Windows-XP</link>	
		<description>Windows XP question... My parents computer is set up that most items are stored on a 20 GB harddrive (or possibly a partition- listed as c:) while they have 100 GB available on d:... When I install software, is it perfectly acceptable to run it off the D drive, and is there a way to switch the set up so most items save to the d drive? &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; And yes, I realize there is probably a simple solution that I&apos;ve been unable to find.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:ask.metafilter.com,2004:site.5407</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2004 13:28:27 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>drezdn</dc:creator>
		
			<category>windows</category>
		
			<category>xp</category>
		
			<category>windowsxp</category>
		
			<category>computer</category>
		
			<category>harddrive</category>
		
			<category>partition</category>
		
			<category>d:\</category>
		
	</item> <item>
		<title>By: skwm</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/5407/Windows-XP#115801</link>	
		<description>Use TweakUI (available from microsoft.com, somwhere) to change the default setting for the install path from C:\Program Files to D:\Program Files</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2004:site.5407-115801</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2004 13:32:27 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>skwm</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: ROU_Xenophobe</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/5407/Windows-XP#115806</link>	
		<description>Or just when you install stuff, don&apos;t send it to the default hell of c:\program files.  Send it to d:\applications\winedt and d:\games\halflife and d:\games\atomicmutant and d:\comm-net\mozilla\firefox and d:\comm-net\mozilla\thunderbird and so on.  Yes, it&apos;s perfectly acceptable to install just about anything whereever the hell you please.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
The programs that automatically install to c:\program files without giving you a say in it are few and far between.  &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
And saving things in some semblance of a logical directory structure is useful, especially since so much crap wants, by default, to go to c:\program files\very long publisher name\very long name of the program with some subtitles 2.3\  If nothing else, it will be easy to find the relevant directories when you&apos;re trying to uninstall Whatever and the uninstall program craps out without deleting everything.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2004:site.5407-115806</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2004 14:01:16 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ROU_Xenophobe</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: kaibutsu</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/5407/Windows-XP#115839</link>	
		<description>I&apos;ve always been a big fan of having a medium-sized main drive with most of the programs on it, and then a large (and physically seperate) data drive, with all of my millions of megabytes of crap.  This serves two purposes: first, the data is easily accessible from both my Linux and Windows boots (something you probably don&apos;t have to worry about, though it&apos;s really practical for a lot of technical reasons!), and second, if my OS explodes (as Windows is wont to do) and I have to reformat for some reason, my data is all kept safe.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2004:site.5407-115839</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2004 15:24:30 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kaibutsu</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: Jairus</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/5407/Windows-XP#115889</link>	
		<description>Personally, I install all my apps on C, and keeep all my personal data (documents, mp3&apos;s, saved dealies, etc) on D/E/F, that way I can just format my C drive and reinstall if Windows gets all twitchy on me.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
If you want to install apps on D, just remember that if/when you format/reinstall, those apps will still be sitting on D, and you&apos;ll have to manually delete them all.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2004:site.5407-115889</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2004 18:17:41 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jairus</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: TimeFactor</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/5407/Windows-XP#115894</link>	
		<description>You can move the &quot;My Documents&quot; folder to the other drive &lt;small&gt;&lt;small&gt;(and give it a less stupid and patronizing name, like maybe &quot;documents&quot;, I mean, whose else would they be?)&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/small&gt;. That way the default save location for many apps is already on the other drive. In Win2K click on the &quot;My Documents&quot; icon, then Properties, then Move and select the location of an existing folder. I imagine it&apos;s the same in XP.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2004:site.5407-115894</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2004 18:46:42 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TimeFactor</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: shepd</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/5407/Windows-XP#115946</link>	
		<description>&amp;gt;and give it a less stupid and patronizing name, like maybe &quot;documents&quot;, I mean, whose else would they be?&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Oh, that&apos;s simple.  Microsoft knew XP would be hacked within seconds of its release, so why not ensure that hackers feel guilty when they download YOUR documents?  :-)&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
On that note, I&apos;d also like to thank all the film editors who converted nice Widescreen movies to pan and scan for coming to my house and measuring my screen.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2004:site.5407-115946</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2004 02:47:44 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>shepd</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: caddis</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/5407/Windows-XP#116089</link>	
		<description>Isn&apos;t it funny that Windows users still assume that a complete reformat will be required at some point (perhaps multiple points) in the life of a Windows system.  I have one system with a two year old version of Windows XP that I have yet to reformat, but it is starting to get a bit buggy.   I kind of hoped that XP would be stable enough to last a little longer than that.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2004:site.5407-116089</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2004 13:38:07 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>caddis</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: Jairus</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/5407/Windows-XP#116154</link>	
		<description>It&apos;s not XP, it&apos;s poorly coded 3rd-party software. If you have an XP box that you only install rock-solid apps on, it&apos;ll last you forever.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2004:site.5407-116154</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2004 00:02:02 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jairus</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
