<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: Get off the cross, we could use the wood.</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/51983/Get-off-the-cross-we-could-use-the-wood/</link>
	<description>Comments on Ask MetaFilter post Get off the cross, we could use the wood.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 11:03:49 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 11:03:49 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Question: Get off the cross, we could use the wood.</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/51983/Get-off-the-cross-we-could-use-the-wood</link>	
		<description>What&apos;s the word for when someone tries to make themselves look charitable, or altruistic, but they are clearly acting out of other interests? &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; I remember an episode of the Daily Show, where they interviewed a Minuteman who surveyed the US-Canada border to keep illegals from entering the country.  Despite the apparent ridiculousness of his action, he still had this false &quot;Do you think I want to be doing this?  There are many things I&apos;d rather be doing!&quot; air about him.&lt;br&gt;
It&apos;s a trait I&apos;ve noticed in a lot of people (probably myself included at times), and I&apos;d like to know how to properly refer to it.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.51983</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 10:57:52 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tbola</dc:creator>
		
			<category>fake</category>
		
			<category>charity</category>
		
			<category>altruism</category>
		
	</item> <item>
		<title>By: interrobang</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/51983/Get-off-the-cross-we-could-use-the-wood#785238</link>	
		<description>Faltruism?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.51983-785238</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 11:03:49 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>interrobang</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: bitdamaged</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/51983/Get-off-the-cross-we-could-use-the-wood#785250</link>	
		<description>disingenuous?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.51983-785250</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 11:09:54 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bitdamaged</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: DevilsAdvocate</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/51983/Get-off-the-cross-we-could-use-the-wood#785254</link>	
		<description>Not a single word, but it can be said that such people have &lt;b&gt;ulterior motives&lt;/b&gt;.  (Note the spelling, please: it&apos;s &lt;b&gt;u&lt;/b&gt;lterior, not &lt;b&gt;a&lt;/b&gt;lterior, an all-too-common mistake.)</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.51983-785254</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 11:11:03 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>DevilsAdvocate</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: teleskiving</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/51983/Get-off-the-cross-we-could-use-the-wood#785258</link>	
		<description>People acting this way are often referred to sarcastically as martyrs.  You could try &quot;self-proclaimed martyr&quot; if you wanted to be unambiguous.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.51983-785258</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 11:15:01 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>teleskiving</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: cobaltnine</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/51983/Get-off-the-cross-we-could-use-the-wood#785260</link>	
		<description>Calculating?  Heck, I read enough sociobiology that I can&apos;t see &apos;altruism&apos; as anything not involving gains for self.  &lt;br&gt;
When it&apos;s especially telling, public, or personally annoying, I use Anton LaVey&apos;s term &apos;Good-Guy Badge&apos;.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.51983-785260</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 11:15:43 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cobaltnine</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: argybarg</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/51983/Get-off-the-cross-we-could-use-the-wood#785263</link>	
		<description>I agree there is no one word that captures it. That said, when people call someone a &quot;martyr&quot; they rarely mean it genuinely. If you wanted to be extra positive you could say a &quot;self-styled martyr.&quot;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
FWIW, &quot;disingenuous,&quot; to me, meanings &quot;pretending not to know something one knows bloody well is true.&quot;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.51983-785263</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 11:16:46 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>argybarg</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: meehawl</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/51983/Get-off-the-cross-we-could-use-the-wood#785273</link>	
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bono#Criticism&quot;&gt;Acting the &lt;s&gt;&lt;blink&gt;Maggot&lt;/blink&gt;&lt;/s&gt; Bono&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.51983-785273</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 11:22:19 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>meehawl</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: loiseau</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/51983/Get-off-the-cross-we-could-use-the-wood#785278</link>	
		<description>Duplicitous?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.51983-785278</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 11:24:17 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>loiseau</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: smallerdemon</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/51983/Get-off-the-cross-we-could-use-the-wood#785295</link>	
		<description>I second bitdamaged and loiseau.  Those are the two I would use.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
You might also use &quot;greedy&quot; or &quot;self serving&quot;.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.51983-785295</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 11:31:19 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>smallerdemon</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: trip and a half</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/51983/Get-off-the-cross-we-could-use-the-wood#785304</link>	
		<description>Dissimulation. Or, just plain old hypocrisy.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.51983-785304</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 11:34:19 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>trip and a half</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: xod</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/51983/Get-off-the-cross-we-could-use-the-wood#785321</link>	
		<description>sanctimonious</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.51983-785321</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 11:43:33 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>xod</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: allelopath</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/51983/Get-off-the-cross-we-could-use-the-wood#785326</link>	
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://m-w.com/dictionary/duplicitous&quot;&gt;duplicitous&lt;/a&gt; might apply: deceptive in words or action</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.51983-785326</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 11:44:39 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>allelopath</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: baggers</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/51983/Get-off-the-cross-we-could-use-the-wood#785330</link>	
		<description>Politician? Otherwise I would go for disingenuous or ulterior motives.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.51983-785330</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 11:46:20 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>baggers</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: allelopath</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/51983/Get-off-the-cross-we-could-use-the-wood#785336</link>	
		<description>oops, sorry loiseau, didn&apos;t mean to steal your thunder</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.51983-785336</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 11:47:32 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>allelopath</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: penchant</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/51983/Get-off-the-cross-we-could-use-the-wood#785345</link>	
		<description>Acting out of noblesse oblige? Although, I&apos;m not sure that necessarily has overtly negative connotations.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.51983-785345</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 11:56:05 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>penchant</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: ewkpates</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/51983/Get-off-the-cross-we-could-use-the-wood#785354</link>	
		<description>self serving.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
noblesse oblige is not ignoble... it is the responsibility nobility has to take care of the less fortunet.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.51983-785354</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 12:01:03 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ewkpates</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: ilsa</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/51983/Get-off-the-cross-we-could-use-the-wood#785367</link>	
		<description>If I may carry the header to its obvious conclusion, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nccbuscc.org/nab/bible/matthew/matthew6.htm&quot;&gt;Pharisees and hypocrites&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.51983-785367</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 12:09:15 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ilsa</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: russilwvong</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/51983/Get-off-the-cross-we-could-use-the-wood#785420</link>	
		<description>Martyr complex.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.51983-785420</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 12:35:32 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>russilwvong</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: cowbellemoo</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/51983/Get-off-the-cross-we-could-use-the-wood#785451</link>	
		<description>Bad faith?&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bad_faith_%28existentialism%29&quot;&gt;^&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.51983-785451</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 13:00:47 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cowbellemoo</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: solid-one-love</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/51983/Get-off-the-cross-we-could-use-the-wood#785525</link>	
		<description>&quot;False charity&quot;. &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Disingenuity and duplicity don&apos;t really fit.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.51983-785525</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 14:30:56 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>solid-one-love</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: argybarg</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/51983/Get-off-the-cross-we-could-use-the-wood#785613</link>	
		<description>You can be duplicitous without exhibiting the behavior described. You could, for instance, just be lying. Dittio dissimulation and self-serving.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Sanctimonious gets a little closer.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.51983-785613</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 15:32:05 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>argybarg</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: rob511</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/51983/Get-off-the-cross-we-could-use-the-wood#785632</link>	
		<description>adj.: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wordreference.com/definition/meretricious&quot;&gt;meretricious&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
n., metaphor: &lt;a href=&quot;http://education.yahoo.com/reference/dictionary/entry/facadism&quot;&gt;fa&#231;adism&lt;/a&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.traditio.com/comment/com0504zu.jpg&quot;&gt;ex.&lt;/a&gt;)</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.51983-785632</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 15:47:27 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rob511</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: FelliniBlank</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/51983/Get-off-the-cross-we-could-use-the-wood#785674</link>	
		<description>also &lt;em&gt;pious&lt;/em&gt; -- in the sense of &quot;falsely earnest or sincere,&quot; not devout.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.51983-785674</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 16:23:50 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>FelliniBlank</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: Falconetti</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/51983/Get-off-the-cross-we-could-use-the-wood#785714</link>	
		<description>psuedoeleemosynaristic?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.51983-785714</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 16:52:32 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Falconetti</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: JekPorkins</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/51983/Get-off-the-cross-we-could-use-the-wood#785750</link>	
		<description>Costanza?&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Human fund?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.51983-785750</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 17:33:21 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>JekPorkins</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: stratastar</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/51983/Get-off-the-cross-we-could-use-the-wood#785766</link>	
		<description>meretriciously, duplicitously facetious. Why use one word when you can use an amalgam of confusing jargon! Hurray!!</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.51983-785766</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 17:47:33 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>stratastar</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: ontic</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/51983/Get-off-the-cross-we-could-use-the-wood#785779</link>	
		<description>I think &lt;b&gt;bitdamaged&lt;/b&gt; has it right.  &quot;Disingenuous&quot; is what you want for the Minuteman guy.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.51983-785779</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 18:01:43 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ontic</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: Mr. Gunn</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/51983/Get-off-the-cross-we-could-use-the-wood#786175</link>	
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Get off the cross, we could use the wood.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I&apos;m so stealing that.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.51983-786175</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 23:01:30 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mr. Gunn</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: orangemiles</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/51983/Get-off-the-cross-we-could-use-the-wood#786293</link>	
		<description>Phillip Morris?  I keep hearing how they spend more money proclaiming that they are doing good deeds than on the good deeds themselves.  As in, more money on commercials about how they&apos;re telling people not to smoke than on commercials telling people not to smoke.  Sheesh.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.51983-786293</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 03:50:11 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>orangemiles</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
