<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: I need a wiki without camels.</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/51286/I-need-a-wiki-without-camels/</link>
	<description>Comments on Ask MetaFilter post I need a wiki without camels.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 19 Nov 2006 12:41:09 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Nov 2006 12:41:09 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Question: I need a wiki without camels.</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/51286/I-need-a-wiki-without-camels</link>	
		<description>WikiFilter: Help me find a lightweight wiki that &lt;i&gt;does not use&lt;/i&gt; CamelCase linking. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; I&apos;m looking for a wiki to use as a CMS (or, alternatively, a really simple CMS to use as a CMS). I don&apos;t want a complicated system with complicated terminology.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
The two things I really like about, say, MediaWiki, is the double-click-to-edit and the [[way it can link| to anything]]. I absolutely despise that retarded CamelCase system. MediaWiki&apos;s template functionality would be a bonus as well.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
(Before you ask: I don&apos;t use MediaWiki because it&apos;s absolutely horrible to skin. There is no proper seperation of HTML and PHP).&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
WakkaWikki&apos;s forks look good, as far as lightweight and modifiability goes, but all of them are stuck with CamelCased links. &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
So yeah.. it sounds like I&apos;m actually looking for MediaWiki, but with friendlier code... Any good tips?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.51286</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Nov 2006 12:06:06 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Harry</dc:creator>
		
			<category>wiki</category>
		
			<category>cms</category>
		
			<category>mediawiki</category>
		
	</item> <item>
		<title>By: mattdini</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/51286/I-need-a-wiki-without-camels#775999</link>	
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://wiki.splitbrain.org/wiki:dokuwiki&quot;&gt;http://wiki.splitbrain.org/wiki:dokuwiki&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
DocuWiki is an easy to use (syntax and skin wise) wiki, geared towards making documentation.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.51286-775999</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Nov 2006 12:41:09 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mattdini</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: aladfar</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/51286/I-need-a-wiki-without-camels#776045</link>	
		<description>PMWiki allows you to disable CamelCase linking and I believe MediaWiki does as well - it&apos;s an option, not a permanent feature.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.51286-776045</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Nov 2006 13:48:57 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>aladfar</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: xulu</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/51286/I-need-a-wiki-without-camels#776067</link>	
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://pmwiki.com/wiki&quot;&gt;PmWiki&lt;/a&gt; is also pretty easy to skin.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.51286-776067</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Nov 2006 14:17:47 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>xulu</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: mbrubeck</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/51286/I-need-a-wiki-without-camels#776245</link>	
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.usemod.com/cgi-bin/wiki.pl&quot;&gt;UseModWiki&lt;/a&gt; is a very simple and mature wiki implelemented in Perl.  You can disable CamelCase linking and use [[free links]] instead.  UseMod is one of the older, simpler wiki implementations, and doesn&apos;t have many of the features of fancy-pants engines like MediaWiki.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.51286-776245</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Nov 2006 19:13:35 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mbrubeck</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: advil</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/51286/I-need-a-wiki-without-camels#776311</link>	
		<description>I think most wikis don&apos;t require camel case per se.  The one I know is &lt;a href=&quot;http://moinmoin.wikiwikiweb.de/&quot;&gt;moinmoin&lt;/a&gt;, and there camel case is automatically linkified, but you can also do [&quot;Not in camel case&quot;] to make a link, and you can also set it to automatically insert spaces between words in regular links that would otherwise be camel-cased.  (At the time of commenting, that link gets an internal server error, but it normally works.)</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.51286-776311</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Nov 2006 20:42:15 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>advil</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
