<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: VoIP over EVDO: Are we there yet??</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/51224/VoIP-over-EVDO-Are-we-there-yet/</link>
	<description>Comments on Ask MetaFilter post VoIP over EVDO: Are we there yet??</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 18 Nov 2006 09:34:24 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Nov 2006 09:34:24 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Question: VoIP over EVDO: Are we there yet??</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/51224/VoIP-over-EVDO-Are-we-there-yet</link>	
		<description>VoIP over EVDO.  If you&apos;ve tried it (especially on Sprint&apos;s Rev A EVDO), how do you like it?  I&apos;d be using Skype, using it rarely, and only using it during calls -- not leaving it &lt;a href=&quot;http://forum.skype.com/index.php?showtopic=16251&amp;hl=high%20bandwidth&amp;st=0&quot;&gt;idling and using bandwidth&lt;/a&gt;.  (With my current Sprint phone-as-modem setup on 1xRTT, I average 400-600ms pings -- i.e., too much latency for VoIP even if I had enough bandwidth.  But on Sprint&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://gigaom.com/2006/10/25/sprint-evdo-rev-a-arrives/&quot;&gt;now active&lt;/a&gt; EVDO Rev A, they claim latency of 100-150ms and upstream averaging 300-400k.)  Yes, I know EVDO is not in the TOS.  And I connect primarily from NYC in strong-signal areas.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.51224</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Nov 2006 08:15:52 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>allterrainbrain</dc:creator>
		
			<category>voip</category>
		
			<category>evdo</category>
		
			<category>sprint</category>
		
			<category>sprintpcs</category>
		
			<category>1xrtt</category>
		
			<category>phoneasmodem</category>
		
			<category>phone</category>
		
			<category>modem</category>
		
			<category>tos</category>
		
			<category>sprinttos</category>
		
	</item> <item>
		<title>By: b1tr0t</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/51224/VoIP-over-EVDO-Are-we-there-yet#775194</link>	
		<description>You might want to try a more modern VoIP service than Skype, like &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gizmoproject.com/&quot;&gt;Gizmo&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Skype selects its codec based on how much outgoing bandwidth it thinks you have. It doesn&apos;t characterize the link beyond that. It won&apos;t know if you are on a high-latency link, or if there is a chokepoint between you and your destination.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
That having been said, even with a VoIP system that dynamically characterizes the link and selects the best codec, call quality on a link with 400-600ms of latency is going to be terrible.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.51224-775194</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Nov 2006 09:34:24 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>b1tr0t</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: allterrainbrain</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/51224/VoIP-over-EVDO-Are-we-there-yet#775295</link>	
		<description>My *current* connection is 400-600ms, as I said, and I agreed with you that that&apos;s too much for VoIP.  I&apos;m asking about people&apos;s experiences using EVDO, especially Rev A.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Thanks for the pointer to Gizmo!</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.51224-775295</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Nov 2006 11:58:23 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>allterrainbrain</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: b1tr0t</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/51224/VoIP-over-EVDO-Are-we-there-yet#775405</link>	
		<description>When I was doing VoIP demos last year, we tried out a number of different cellular PCMICA cards, up and down the west coast (mostly LA, Seattle, and the Bay Area). IIRC, 400-600ms was best case. 1000-2000 ms was much more typical, and even 600ms links would spike at 1000-2000ms unpredictably. EVDO was among the technologies we looked at, but I don&apos;t know what revision.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I think the cell providers will do everything they can to keep VoIP off their data networks, as it threatens to completely undermine their business model.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.51224-775405</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Nov 2006 14:27:18 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>b1tr0t</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: allterrainbrain</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/51224/VoIP-over-EVDO-Are-we-there-yet#775623</link>	
		<description>Yeah, I think Rev A is the first cellular data network that will be usable for VoIP.  People are reporting consistent real world latency in the 100-200ms.  If you &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/search?q=%22voip+over+evdo%22&amp;start=0&amp;ie=utf-8&amp;oe=utf-8&quot;&gt;google the exact phrase &quot;voip over evdo,&quot;&lt;/a&gt; you see people doing various speed/quality tests with previous versions of EVDO, which are usually characterized as &quot;almost there&quot; with latency being the issue.  This imples Rev A could be the first usable network for VoIP.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I was hoping to get some responses here from early adopters of Rev A, but it&apos;s probably a few weeks too early to have asked the question.  I&apos;ll try again soon.  I really appreciate the pointer to Gizmo and I&apos;ll be watching it carefully (especially as it gains more area codes for Call In numbers), since it looks preferable to Skype for several reasons.  Thanks!</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.51224-775623</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Nov 2006 21:56:11 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>allterrainbrain</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
