Professor ___:(postscript: he bumped me to a B-, not because he agreed with me, but because I wrote such a nice letter. See? Build your bridges, don't burn 'em. Life is too short, college is even shorter.)
I am writing in regards to my grade on the second analytical paper in PS145.
As you noted in your comments, my grade of C+ was determined on the basis that my answer to the question was half complete because I focused merely on Wilson’s policy solutions rather than analysis of the problem itself. However, it was never clear to me that I was to incorporate both his policy solutions and an analysis of the problem into the essay. The assignment asked for “a review essay of William Julius Wilson's book.” In class, you explained that it was nearly impossible to cover all the strengths and weaknesses of Wilson’s book in five to seven pages, and that we should focus on specific yet expansive issues within the book.
After reading the book I felt that I had strong issues with the way that Wilson prepared his policy proposals. On the flipside, I primarily agreed with the way that Wilson set up his argument as to the structure and nature of the “new urban poverty.” Since I had a limited framework in which to express my opinions about the book, I chose to concentrate my argument on attacking the policy solutions rather than commending his setting up of the argument.
I agree with your criticism to the extent that I did not adequately summarize the argument of the book in the paragraph or two that is customary in an analytical paper. However, I disagree that my analysis should have been split evenly between the framework and the policy proposals. I feel that I wrote what was asked of me – a critique of the book focusing on specific areas of Wilson’s argument.
We both seem to agree, given the final comments, that the paper as written was structurally sound and presented a convincing argument. Therefore, I feel that my interpretation of the assignment as written and explained in class is the sole contributor toward my grade on the paper. I would sincerely appreciate any consideration you would be able to give toward changing my grade or consulting with me as to how I could rewrite the paper to satisfy the assignment.
Respectfully yours,
Also, there's really no point to complaining to the professor when you can complain to their superior.
posted by smackfu at 6:12 PM on November 17, 2006