<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: quicker buzz via diet soda and booze?</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/48770/quicker-buzz-via-diet-soda-and-booze/</link>
	<description>Comments on Ask MetaFilter post quicker buzz via diet soda and booze?</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 07:14:39 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 07:14:39 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Question: quicker buzz via diet soda and booze?</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/48770/quicker-buzz-via-diet-soda-and-booze</link>	
		<description>Someone suggested to me that rum and diet coke has more of an impact (metabolizes faster?) than rum and regular coke.  Is this true, and if so why?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.48770</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 07:04:10 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rampy</dc:creator>
		
			<category>barroombet</category>
		
			<category>bacardi</category>
		
			<category>rumandcoke</category>
		
			<category>metabolism</category>
		
			<category>alcohol</category>
		
	</item> <item>
		<title>By: bcwinters</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/48770/quicker-buzz-via-diet-soda-and-booze#741685</link>	
		<description>Well, regular Coke has calories from sugar. Diet Coke doesn&apos;t.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
It&apos;s the equivalent of drinking a shot along with a little 100 calorie packet of crackers versus drinking the shot without the crackers. More or less.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.48770-741685</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 07:14:39 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bcwinters</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: TheNewWazoo</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/48770/quicker-buzz-via-diet-soda-and-booze#741686</link>	
		<description>&lt;br&gt;
Well, according to &lt;a href=&quot;http://dailymed.nlm.nih.gov/dailymed/drugInfo.cfm?id=1033&quot;&gt;this&lt;/a&gt; DailyMed article, &quot;...Caffeine may enhance the effects of: other narcotic analgesics, [and] alcohol&quot;.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
The intergoogle found nothing about contraindications between aspartame and alcohol, which would be my only other line of inquiry.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
In my (humble, non-medical) opinion, this is likely an urban legend, much in the same vein as people claiming to get &quot;differently&quot; drunk from different liquors. It&apos;s all ethyl alcohol, people.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.48770-741686</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 07:14:47 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TheNewWazoo</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: uncleozzy</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/48770/quicker-buzz-via-diet-soda-and-booze#741693</link>	
		<description>Looks like diet mixers may result in &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20061005/hl_nm/diet_cocktails_dc&quot;&gt;higher peak BAC&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.48770-741693</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 07:18:01 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>uncleozzy</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: GaelFC</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/48770/quicker-buzz-via-diet-soda-and-booze#741713</link>	
		<description>We had this story on MSNBC some months back. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/12939190/&quot;&gt;Here it is.&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Australian researchers &quot;found that artificial sweeteners found in such popular mixers as Diet Coke and sugar-free Red Bull lead to a high rate of alcohol absorption, resulting in a greater blood alcohol peak and concentration than from drinks made with sugar-based mixers.&quot;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.48770-741713</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 07:40:59 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>GaelFC</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: cgg</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/48770/quicker-buzz-via-diet-soda-and-booze#741723</link>	
		<description>Well, if caffeine enhances the effect of alcohol, I&apos;m pretty sure Diet Coke has slightly more caffeine than regular Coke. I highly doubt that would make a difference, however - it&apos;s only a very slight increase in caffeine.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.48770-741723</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 07:45:59 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cgg</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: rampy</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/48770/quicker-buzz-via-diet-soda-and-booze#741745</link>	
		<description>thanks all! Those two articles where what I was looking for/getting at.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.48770-741745</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 08:11:04 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rampy</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: PetiePal</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/48770/quicker-buzz-via-diet-soda-and-booze#741826</link>	
		<description>Sugar makes you metabolize the alcohol quicker, hence getting drunker quicker as well. Of course this is all proportional to how many shots not to mention if you&apos;re on an empty stomach. If you are you&apos;ll process the alcohol pretty fast either way.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.48770-741826</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 09:19:20 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>PetiePal</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: rampy</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/48770/quicker-buzz-via-diet-soda-and-booze#742035</link>	
		<description>Petie, woudn&apos;t your theory mean that regular coke would get your drunk quicker (or have a higher BAC quicker), which is the opposite of the theory being put forth that sugar subsitutes in diet mixers cause faster absorbtion? *shrug*&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
rampy</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.48770-742035</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 12:57:29 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rampy</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
