<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

      <title>Comments on: Ajax design tips</title>
      <link>http://ask.metafilter.com/47623/Ajax-design-tips/</link>
      <description>Comments on Ask MetaFilter post Ajax design tips</description>
	  	  <pubDate>Sat, 30 Sep 2006 16:27:23 -0800</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Sep 2006 16:27:23 -0800</lastBuildDate>
      <language>en-us</language>
	  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	  <ttl>60</ttl>

<item>
  	<title>Question: Ajax design tips</title>
  	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/47623/Ajax-design-tips</link>	
  	<description>Ajax design - The more little UI widgets I add to my project, the harder it is to maintain a coherent directory structure. Any tips or articles on how to maintain an intelligent directory/site structure on Ajax projects, where you have N number of little UI widgets that are retrieved on demand?</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">post:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.47623</guid>
  	<pubDate>Sat, 30 Sep 2006 13:05:06 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>xmutex</dc:creator>
	
	<category>ajax</category>
	
	<category>javascript</category>
	
	<category>design</category>
	
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: Khalad</title>
  	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/47623/Ajax-design-tips#724817</link>	
  	<description>Can you be more specific about the problem?</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.47623-724817</guid>
  	<pubDate>Sat, 30 Sep 2006 16:27:23 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>Khalad</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: AmbroseChapel</title>
  	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/47623/Ajax-design-tips#724823</link>	
  	<description>Are you saying that all your little widgets are in separate files? &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
If so, why?&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Make a logical grouping of which functions are likely to be required on the same page and put all those functions into the same file. That way your pages have fewer &amp;lt;script&amp;gt; tags. You might waste a  bit of bandwidth for each file you include, but that&apos;s probably better than having multiple includes which make for multiple server hits.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
But yes, more detail would help. Maybe I&apos;ve misinterpreted the problem.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.47623-724823</guid>
  	<pubDate>Sat, 30 Sep 2006 16:37:03 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>AmbroseChapel</dc:creator>
</item>

    </channel>
</rss>
