<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: What's with this inverse correlation?</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/46996/Whats-with-this-inverse-correlation/</link>
	<description>Comments on Ask MetaFilter post What's with this inverse correlation?</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2006 13:48:28 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2006 13:48:28 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Question: What&apos;s with this inverse correlation?</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/46996/Whats-with-this-inverse-correlation</link>	
		<description>I recently increased my dosage of lamictal from 100mg/day to 200mg/day.  I was prescribed 100mg pills, whereas before I had 25mg pills.  For a month&apos;s supply of 100mg/daily in 25mg units, the bill sent to my insurance was over $500.  For 200mg in 100mg units, it was just under $300.

Why would more of the active ingredient cost less?  I know the difference in pill count can&apos;t account for that much of a differential.  What&apos;s the creative economics here?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.46996</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2006 13:29:38 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jammer</dc:creator>
		
			<category>lamictal</category>
		
			<category>drug</category>
		
			<category>prescription</category>
		
			<category>pricing</category>
		
			<category>pharmacy</category>
		
	</item> <item>
		<title>By: lockle</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/46996/Whats-with-this-inverse-correlation#715909</link>	
		<description>Sadly, they do not charge for meds by how many mg they are.  It&apos;s odd, I know... Also, look into 200mg pills. They actually make them. I would take one a day and it was cheaper then buying two 100mg pills (I was paying out of pocket)</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.46996-715909</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2006 13:48:28 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lockle</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: langeNU</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/46996/Whats-with-this-inverse-correlation#715911</link>	
		<description>Well you are getting half the number of pills, and drug prices are often based solely on pill count rather than the amount of active ingredient in any given pill. &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
For reference, the red book (a Pharmaceutical reference) price of lamictal is $138.52 for 35 25mg pills, $395.78 for 100 25mg pills, $419.04 for 100 100mg pills, $278.98 for 60 150mg pills and $298.07 for 60 200mg pills.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Thus, there appears to be a per pill cost, with only a fractionary increase in cost per pill for an upped dosage.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.46996-715911</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2006 13:49:27 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>langeNU</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: ArsncHeart</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/46996/Whats-with-this-inverse-correlation#715913</link>	
		<description>I don&apos;t have an answer, but I recently ran into the same thing with Zoloft (the generic, even).  I am prescribed 50mg daily, and it was cheaper to get a 15 day supply of 100mg tabs instead of a 30 day supply of 50mg tabs.  I&apos;m just as curious. I can&apos;t believe they charge by the pill instead of by the dosage. (I mean, I can, but it doesn&apos;t make sense to my medicated brain.)</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.46996-715913</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2006 13:50:12 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ArsncHeart</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: MarkAnd</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/46996/Whats-with-this-inverse-correlation#715916</link>	
		<description>Here are the AWPs (source: Red Book)&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
LAMICTAL TAB 25MG (100) $395.78, $3.96 each&lt;br&gt;
LAMICTAL TAB 100MG (100) $419.04, $4.19 each&lt;br&gt;
LAMICTAL TAB 150MG (60) $278.98, $4.65 each&lt;br&gt;
LAMICTAL TAB 200MG (60) $298.07, $4.97 each</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.46996-715916</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2006 13:53:09 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MarkAnd</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: MarkAnd</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/46996/Whats-with-this-inverse-correlation#715921</link>	
		<description>Darn!</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.46996-715921</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2006 13:54:02 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MarkAnd</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: nakedcodemonkey</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/46996/Whats-with-this-inverse-correlation#715935</link>	
		<description>&quot;Pills often have similar prices for different doses because &apos;the actual amount of the active chemical is a very small part of many pills. The bulk of the cost comes from packaging, advertising, and R&amp;amp;D, which are the same regardless of dose,&apos; says Stafford. Drug companies also try to keep prices similar because they don&apos;t want to penalize patients who need higher doses.&quot; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.usnews.com/usnews/health/articles/040531/31pill.htm&quot;&gt;cite&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Also, when I asked a similar question at the vet&apos;s, they said the reason why the 4 week supply cost exactly the same as the 1 week supply is because most of the charge is their pharmacist&apos;s flat rate &quot;filling fee&quot;.  Always ask your doctor (or vet) to specify max number of refills on the script.  It gives the pharmacist a lot more latitude for saving you money.  Also ask both doctor and pharmacist about which meds are eligible for &lt;a href=&quot;http://mednews.stanford.edu/releases/2002/august/pillsplitting.html&quot;&gt;pill splitting&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Insurers have begun to catch on to the huge savings potential and encourage splitting where possible, so don&apos;t assume yours will object.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.46996-715935</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2006 14:00:04 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nakedcodemonkey</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: OmieWise</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/46996/Whats-with-this-inverse-correlation#716088</link>	
		<description>I&apos;ve assumed that part of the pricing was due to the frequency with which a given dosage is rx&apos;ed.  In the insidious model, those pills most frequently rx&apos;ed are priced higher to maximize profit.  In the generous model, those rx&apos;ed less frequently are priced higher because fewer of them are made so there is less economy of scale in the manufacturing.  I have no evidence for either, but it at least suggest a reason for the price difference.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.46996-716088</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2006 15:40:45 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>OmieWise</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: soulbarn</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/46996/Whats-with-this-inverse-correlation#716356</link>	
		<description>I pay for my own Lamictal, sadly, and have found the same thing at my local Target pharmacy: 60 100 mg Lamicatals cost about $190; 30 200s cost $135. &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Then again, the Canadian generic Lamictal - not available in the US - is about one-third either of those prices (2008 is when the generic should be available here.)&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
BTW, if you do have to pay for your own meds, Target and Costco&apos;s pharmacies are usually MUCH cheaper than your local Rite-Aid or CVS. (Rite-Aid claims to match prices, but two in my neighborhood outright refused.)</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.46996-716356</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2006 19:56:29 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>soulbarn</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
