<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: Book recommendation on Digital Circuit Design</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/46945/Book-recommendation-on-Digital-Circuit-Design/</link>
	<description>Comments on Ask MetaFilter post Book recommendation on Digital Circuit Design</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2006 05:48:50 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2006 05:48:50 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Question: Book recommendation on Digital Circuit Design</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/46945/Book-recommendation-on-Digital-Circuit-Design</link>	
		<description>I need suggestions for a good book that covers digital circuit design (specifically practical design using MSI/LSI TTL, PLD&apos;s, CMOS, FPGA, etc.  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; I&apos;m taking an intro to digital circuits course, and as much as you can tell me to visit my prof and TA&apos;s office hours, I only have so much time.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Currently, our text is Digital Design Principles and Practice by John Wakerly, however, I find this book to be really difficult to understand. We have a course reader, but it&apos;s more with an assumption that one understands the text. So I need something that&apos;s in plainer English, as I&apos;m having a bit of trouble connecting what I learned in Digital Logic with what I&apos;m learning in Digital Circuits.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Any book recommendations would be greatly appreciated! (It can be a textbook as long as you think it&apos;s easier to understand than my Wakerly book!)</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.46945</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2006 00:23:42 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>beammeup4</dc:creator>
		
			<category>digital</category>
		
			<category>circuits</category>
		
			<category>design</category>
		
			<category>computers</category>
		
			<category>electronics</category>
		
			<category>book</category>
		
			<category>logic</category>
		
			<category>ttl</category>
		
			<category>cmos</category>
		
	</item> <item>
		<title>By: gregchttm</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/46945/Book-recommendation-on-Digital-Circuit-Design#715215</link>	
		<description>While it focuses on analog electronics, there are a number of very good chapters on digital in Horowitz and Hill&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/Art-Electronics-Paul-Horowitz/dp/0521370957/sr=8-1/qid=1158842682/ref=pd_bbs_1/102-1691256-4698507?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&quot;&gt;The Art of Electronics&lt;/a&gt;. I was in the same boat of having a not-very-good text for digital design classes in school, and this book helped more times than I can count.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.46945-715215</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2006 05:48:50 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gregchttm</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: blindsight</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/46945/Book-recommendation-on-Digital-Circuit-Design#715285</link>	
		<description>I must second gregchttm&apos;s recommendation. The Art of Electronics is truly a classic. It covers *good* circuit design - not just circuit design, and includes examples of *plausible* but poor designs - so they can be avoided. The whole text is written in a very accessible style, and the emphasis is upon *doing* electronics - as opposed to just theroizing about electronics. It is, by far, the best single text I have ever encoutered. Highly recommended.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.46945-715285</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2006 07:00:25 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>blindsight</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
