<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: Google exploit</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/46548/Google-exploit/</link>
	<description>Comments on Ask MetaFilter post Google exploit</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2006 04:21:02 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2006 04:21:02 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Question: Google exploit</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/46548/Google-exploit</link>	
		<description>Can someone explain to me what this: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/u/gplus&quot;&gt;http://www.google.com/u/gplus&lt;/a&gt; is all about?  How is it done?  Hint: you may not want to enter your real Google login details into the form. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; This popped up on del.icio.us today.  I&apos;m trying to work out how someone scored a google.com/* address to run fake password-grabbing login page on.   What&apos;s the trick?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.46548</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2006 03:52:51 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jimbob</dc:creator>
		
			<category>google</category>
		
			<category>gmail</category>
		
			<category>exploit</category>
		
	</item> <item>
		<title>By: gleuschk</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/46548/Google-exploit#709654</link>	
		<description>Why do you say it&apos;s a fake?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.46548-709654</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2006 04:21:02 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gleuschk</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: Jimbob</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/46548/Google-exploit#709658</link>	
		<description>Well, because I doubt it&apos;s official Google corporate policy to set up a page claiming to be offering a &quot;Limited Beta of Gmail Plus!&quot; that sends you off to a remote domain that tells you the password you typed in.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.46548-709658</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2006 04:23:51 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jimbob</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: gleuschk</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/46548/Google-exploit#709662</link>	
		<description>Ah, ok.  I entered jimbob/wtf for the username/pwd, and got back &lt;blockquote&gt;You (could have) gotten served!&lt;br&gt;
jimbob = username you entered&lt;br&gt;
wtf = password you entered &lt;br&gt;
No data was actually taken, just displayed to you :) This is just a proof of concept of what a malicious user could do with this exploit. &lt;/blockquote&gt;The URL in the address bar is http://www.monthsbehind.net/google.php</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.46548-709662</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2006 04:26:39 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gleuschk</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: wilful</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/46548/Google-exploit#709667</link>	
		<description>So to repeat JBs question, wtf is going on?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.46548-709667</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2006 04:34:29 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>wilful</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: pheideaux</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/46548/Google-exploit#709670</link>	
		<description>That is really bizarre. It is not character spoofing because the trick still workes if one types the URL into the address bar. The &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.monthsbehind.net/&quot;&gt;monthsbehind.com root directory&lt;/a&gt; is not helpful at all.  Is this a prank by an internal Google employee?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.46548-709670</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2006 04:39:52 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>pheideaux</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: jessamyn</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/46548/Google-exploit#709672</link>	
		<description>Usually in situations like this, I blame the interns.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.46548-709672</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2006 04:43:27 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jessamyn</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: jessamyn</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/46548/Google-exploit#709674</link>	
		<description>You can see the same effect with other pages under the u directory like this: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/u/evl&quot;&gt;Electronic visualization lab&lt;/a&gt;. This page &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/u/man&quot;&gt;Cobranded University Search&lt;/a&gt; seems to shed some light on to it. It&apos;s their university offering.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.46548-709674</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2006 04:46:27 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jessamyn</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: edd</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/46548/Google-exploit#709676</link>	
		<description>Right, ucdavis.edu is mentioned in the source of the dodgy page.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.46548-709676</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2006 04:50:39 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>edd</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: jedrek</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/46548/Google-exploit#709677</link>	
		<description>The google /u/ pages are custom search pages for various organizations, especially universities and schools:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/u/custom&quot;&gt;Google&apos;s own example&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
The schools have total control over the content of those pages, so they can easily perform a hack like the gmailplus one. I&apos;m glad someone demonstrated this exploit.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.46548-709677</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2006 04:52:02 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jedrek</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: jessamyn</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/46548/Google-exploit#709678</link>	
		<description>More &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/u/y&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/u/accessible&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/u/mcmaster&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; and description of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/options/universities.html&quot;&gt;other schools in the program here&lt;/a&gt;, though gplus is not on the list.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.46548-709678</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2006 04:52:26 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jessamyn</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: matthewr</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/46548/Google-exploit#709680</link>	
		<description>I&apos;m not sure exactly what&apos;s going on here, and I suspect Google will take it down shortly.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Basically: google.com/u contains various legit Google pages. &lt;br&gt;
For example, try &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/u/blah&quot;&gt;/blah&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/u/test&quot;&gt;/test&lt;/a&gt; or &lt;a href=&quot;http://http://www.google.com/u/2&quot;&gt;/2&lt;/a&gt;. The /test one mentions cobranded university search. Perhaps a mischevious university employee has access to upload a page to /gplus?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.46548-709680</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2006 04:55:03 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matthewr</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: matthewr</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/46548/Google-exploit#709682</link>	
		<description>&lt;small&gt;Whoa, I need to refresh more often and use preview.&lt;/small&gt;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.46548-709682</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2006 04:55:41 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matthewr</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: jessamyn</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/46548/Google-exploit#709688</link>	
		<description>I sent an email to the guy who has the monthsbehind domain registered to let him know that the link to that page is now out in the wild. His info is easy to find on whois, so this was probably some sort of example page and not an intentional nefarious hack.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.46548-709688</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2006 05:03:43 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jessamyn</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: Jimbob</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/46548/Google-exploit#709689</link>	
		<description>&lt;i&gt;I send an email to the guy who has the domain registered to let him know that the link to that page is now out in the wild.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Heh, I wanted answers not action..! I guess this was all a lot simpler than I thought...</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.46548-709689</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2006 05:04:58 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jimbob</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: peacay</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/46548/Google-exploit#709691</link>	
		<description>Here&apos;s a &lt;a href=&quot;http://ericfarraro.com/?p=6&quot;&gt;link&lt;/a&gt; to the guy who uncovered it as a potential phishing loophole.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.46548-709691</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2006 05:07:59 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>peacay</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: Jimbob</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/46548/Google-exploit#709698</link>	
		<description>Ah ha, now I get it, thanks to Peacay.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Google offers a service for universities to &quot;brand&quot; Google search by specifying their own header and footer.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
This makes it possible, if you get onto that service, to insert a &quot;header&quot; and &quot;footer&quot; that makes the page look like a Gmail login, giving you your own google.com URL with a password form that can send the data to whatever site you like.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
And they would have got away with it, too, if it wasn&apos;t for us darned kids!</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.46548-709698</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2006 05:14:55 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jimbob</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: Coda</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/46548/Google-exploit#710453</link>	
		<description>Firefox 2 considers that link to be a phishing attempt.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.46548-710453</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2006 17:56:33 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Coda</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: Salmonberry</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/46548/Google-exploit#711053</link>	
		<description>Yeah, I get a pop up warning me not to use the page at all. &amp;lt;3 Firefox.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.46548-711053</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Sep 2006 14:16:41 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Salmonberry</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: jessamyn</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/46548/Google-exploit#711800</link>	
		<description>I got an email back from the UC Davis people:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Dear Ms. West&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
We appreciate your concern and you taking the time to contact us.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
One of our programming students, Eric Farraro, discovered a security issue&lt;br&gt;
for Google, on their military and university local search engine software,&lt;br&gt;
which actually creates a security risk to Google servers and not the&lt;br&gt;
military/university site.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
He ran a legitimate test site to prove his point, under the guidance of his&lt;br&gt;
supervisor, Charlie Turner.  When he had proof, he contacted Google, who&lt;br&gt;
immediately took down the specific functionality while they fix the bug.&lt;br&gt;
(It is still down).  Eric&apos;s site did not actually do any &quot;phishing&quot; - it&lt;br&gt;
strictly returned the information to the person originating the login, to&lt;br&gt;
let them know that had it been a real phishing site, their information would&lt;br&gt;
have been taken and used without their knowledge.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
His discovery will certainly save millions from a potentially huge&lt;br&gt;
&quot;phishing&quot; exploit, as any phishing done using this security breach would be&lt;br&gt;
using google&apos;s name as a &quot;www.google.com/u/[put whatever you want here] URL&lt;br&gt;
- which of course would be considered a trusted source by many.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Therefore, rest assured that this site was created with both the knowledge&lt;br&gt;
of his supervisor and now of Google - who is working to correct the security&lt;br&gt;
breach that Eric discovered.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Once again, thank-you very much for your inquiry.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Sincerely&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Liz Gibson</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.46548-711800</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Sep 2006 19:13:19 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jessamyn</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
