<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: To buy or not to buy - even what to buy!</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/44095/To-buy-or-not-to-buy-even-what-to-buy/</link>
	<description>Comments on Ask MetaFilter post To buy or not to buy - even what to buy!</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2006 07:08:23 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2006 07:08:23 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Question: To buy or not to buy - even what to buy!</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/44095/To-buy-or-not-to-buy-even-what-to-buy</link>	
		<description>Should I stick with my last July G4 iBook, buy a MacBook or an iMac or wait for untold delights? &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; I&apos;m thinking that now my iBook is a year old it might be an idea to sell it and move on to pastures more powerful. I was thinking of a MacBook, or even ditching the portable form factor now my lifestyle has changed and going for an iMac. Does anyone have any thoughts or advice? And should I be doing this now - is there something in the pipeline I should be waiting for?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.44095</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2006 07:01:30 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dance</dc:creator>
		
			<category>osx</category>
		
			<category>imac</category>
		
			<category>macbook</category>
		
			<category>laptop</category>
		
			<category>desktop</category>
		
			<category>computer</category>
		
	</item> <item>
		<title>By: alms</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/44095/To-buy-or-not-to-buy-even-what-to-buy#676361</link>	
		<description>Wait at least a couple of months to see if Apple bumps the MacBook Pros up to the Core 2 Duo processors.  It&apos;s a widely expected move.  The Core 2 Duos use less power and are 64-bit machines.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.44095-676361</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2006 07:08:23 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>alms</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: jxpx777</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/44095/To-buy-or-not-to-buy-even-what-to-buy#676376</link>	
		<description>I am planning to do exactly as alms says in contemplating a replacement for my dearly beloved Powerbook G4 Cyprian (purchased June 2005) with the addition that I will wait until they release Leopard. The new machines next spring (think MacWorld and then spring break) should be really nice. By then hopefully they will have a new iPod out and I can buy my new Mac and a new iPod when they have the back to school promotion with iPod rebate.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.44095-676376</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2006 07:23:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jxpx777</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: baylink</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/44095/To-buy-or-not-to-buy-even-what-to-buy#676382</link>	
		<description>Yeah, don&apos;t buy a MacBook, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.appledefects.com/?p=15&quot;&gt;unless you think you need something new to cook breakfast on&lt;/a&gt;...</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.44095-676382</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2006 07:29:34 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>baylink</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: cillit bang</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/44095/To-buy-or-not-to-buy-even-what-to-buy#676392</link>	
		<description>&lt;i&gt;And should I be doing this now - is there something in the pipeline I should be waiting for?&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
As always with Apple these days, nobody knows, and any &quot;rumors&quot; you hear are stabs in the dark. The Intel Core 2 Duo is definitely due soon (because Intel have said so), but it&apos;s probably not going to be a spectacular upgrade, and no one knows when the iBook or iMac will actually get them.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
The MacBook doesn&apos;t get much hotter than your iBook. appledefects.com is hardly a source of impartial advice on this, and the cooking breakfast video that circulated was a joke.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.44095-676392</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2006 07:37:49 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cillit bang</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: Zed_Lopez</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/44095/To-buy-or-not-to-buy-even-what-to-buy#676420</link>	
		<description>The Core 2 Duo is out and expected to find its way into machines by the end of the month. I don&apos;t think Apple will sit by and watch its competitors scoop it, so I think a CPU improvements in at least some of the existing lines is likely, along with price decreases in existing Core Duo systems. (As cillit bang notes, this is speculation...)&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
The next big thing for laptops is likely to be &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Centrino&quot;&gt;Santa Rosa&lt;/a&gt; &quot;in the first half of 2007.&quot;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
If you&apos;re not interested in the portability, you can get a lot more computer for a lot less money by getting a desktop instead of a laptop.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.44095-676420</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2006 07:58:41 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zed_Lopez</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: outlier</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/44095/To-buy-or-not-to-buy-even-what-to-buy#676457</link>	
		<description>I bought myself a MacBook and I&apos;m well pleased with it. (Yes it runs hot. No, it hasn&apos;t cooked my testicles. No, the battery hasn&apos;t exploded. No, the case hasn&apos;t flaked or discolored.) My previous iBook was quite old (2001!) and I badly needed more speed and to get on the Intel wagon. Having said that, I think you can wait for a while. If your machine is only 1 year old, it&apos;s still pretty much up to date. Give the new hardware a little longer to shake out. Even a few months and you&apos;re likely get more bang (and reliability) per-buck.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.44095-676457</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2006 08:22:21 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>outlier</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: justgary</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/44095/To-buy-or-not-to-buy-even-what-to-buy#676484</link>	
		<description>&lt;i&gt;The MacBook doesn&apos;t get much hotter than your iBook.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Sure it does. I can put my iBook and macbook side by side and let them just sit there and after 15 minutes it&apos;s not even close. The iBook runs considerably cooler than the macbook.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
That said, I love it. I can deal with the heat.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.44095-676484</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2006 08:42:42 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>justgary</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: mbrubeck</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/44095/To-buy-or-not-to-buy-even-what-to-buy#676493</link>	
		<description>The &lt;a href=&quot;http://buyersguide.macrumors.com/&quot;&gt;Mac Buyer&apos;s Guide&lt;/a&gt; lists dates of past releases in each product line, which is useful if you&apos;re trying to second-guess future product release dates.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.44095-676493</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2006 08:47:52 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mbrubeck</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: nonliteral</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/44095/To-buy-or-not-to-buy-even-what-to-buy#676700</link>	
		<description>One of the great truths about being an Apple owner is that there is not only always something in the pipeline worth waiting for, but that purchasing today&apos;s unit will hasten the release of the new one...  (Or at least it always seems that way)&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
The big question probably should be &quot;do you need the additional speed now?&quot;, with a follow-up of &quot;what applications do you need the speed in most?&quot;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I dumped my (1.5 GHz) Powerbook and went to a MacBook Pro about five months ago, and I&apos;m very happy with it -- I do web app development, and it was worth it just for the improvement in browser render speed alone.  Problems have been minimal, and every OS update has been an improvement.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
On the other hand, I&apos;m still stuck with Microsoft Office and Macromedia Studio (both of which I have to use, for various reasons) not being out in universal binaries yet, which makes them about as slow as they ever were on my G4. &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
If the primary applications you use are not out as universal binaries, you might as well wait -- you&apos;re not going to see a performance improvement moving to the Intel machines until they are ported over. &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
On the other hand, if the applications you spend time in ARE available as universal binaries, and you need the speed today, then there&apos;s probably nothing wrong with going for it -- sure there will be faster machines coming, but the bump between a Core Duo and a Core 2 Duo probably won&apos;t be anywhere near as big as the bump from G4 to Core Duo (if running universal binaries).  &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Given that you&apos;re already considering staying with the G4 a little longer, staying with a Core Duo long enough to make it worth buying would probably not be a problem -- as long as it buys you any improvement today.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Desktop vs. Notebook is a personal decision; my notebook spends 95%+ of the time on the shelf in my office connected to an external keyboard and monitor.  But the convenience of being able to toss it in a bag in 15 seconds, going to wherever and being able to open it back up and have all of my stuff at my finger tips, just where I left it, is big enough for me to have stuck with the G4 notebooks for several years when I could have had much better performance on a G5 desktop...</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.44095-676700</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2006 11:23:39 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nonliteral</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: zeypher</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/44095/To-buy-or-not-to-buy-even-what-to-buy#676752</link>	
		<description>cillit bang: ...but it&apos;s probably not going to be a spectacular upgrade...&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Uhh, actually, it would be notable.  It&apos;s a completely different microarchitecture between the Core and the Core 2 chips.  And the Core 2 is usually about 30% faster per-core, at the same clock speed... and in some ops (notably floating point vector ops... it can be multiples faster).   It&apos;s possibly the most signifigant single jump in processor capabilities for an Intel chip since the PentiumPro came out circa 1995. &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
As far as it relates to the question... yes. If you care about price/performance wait a month or two.  There won&apos;t be another jump in per-core processor capabilities like this for at least two, perhaps three years.  At the very worst, you can pick up a cheap Core (1) Duo macbook for cheaps on ebay before year end.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.44095-676752</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2006 14:32:37 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>zeypher</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: advil</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/44095/To-buy-or-not-to-buy-even-what-to-buy#679138</link>	
		<description>In case the OP is still watching this thread -- &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.macrumors.com/pages/2006/08/20060811095645.shtml&quot;&gt;rumors&lt;/a&gt; suggest that both lines will be upgraded in sept.  (I&apos;m facing the same question, except that I also really would like the ipod rebate.  But on the other hand I suspect they&apos;ll upgrade the graphics card in the macbook to the 965, which still isn&apos;t that great, but appears to suck quite a bit less than what you&apos;d get now.  And my g3 ibook is pretty slow nowadays.)</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.44095-679138</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Aug 2006 23:20:34 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>advil</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: cillit bang</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/44095/To-buy-or-not-to-buy-even-what-to-buy#679247</link>	
		<description>Rumors from Asia have almost always turned out to be bullshit.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;i&gt; If you care about price/performance wait a month or two&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
There&apos;s absolutely no reason to think the MacBook will get the Core 2 Duo in that timeframe. the MacBook Pro will get it at the earliest opportunity, but there&apos;s much less need for the MacBook to have the latest processor, and Apple has its margins to think about. It could be six months or more.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;i&gt; And the Core 2 is usually about 30% faster per-core, at the same clock speed... and in some ops (notably floating point vector ops... it can be multiples faster).&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Except the benchmarks don&apos;t seem to be showing this.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.44095-679247</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Aug 2006 07:02:05 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cillit bang</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
