<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

      <title>Comments on: How to setup W2K3 to allow users to manage user accounts without being an admin?</title>
      <link>http://ask.metafilter.com/42845/How-to-setup-W2K3-to-allow-users-to-manage-user-accounts-without-being-an-admin/</link>
      <description>Comments on Ask MetaFilter post How to setup W2K3 to allow users to manage user accounts without being an admin?</description>
	  	  <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2006 14:50:52 -0800</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2006 14:50:52 -0800</lastBuildDate>
      <language>en-us</language>
	  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	  <ttl>60</ttl>

<item>
  	<title>Question: How to setup W2K3 to allow users to manage user accounts without being an admin?</title>
  	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/42845/How-to-setup-W2K3-to-allow-users-to-manage-user-accounts-without-being-an-admin</link>	
  	<description>I&apos;ve got a web server that we&apos;ve just put into our DMZ.  I need to be able to grant the web developers the ability to manage user accounts, but I don&apos;t want them to be administrators (in other words: regular users who can manage other user accounts: change passwords, create new ones, delete old ones, etc).   &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; Since the machine is in the DMZ, I can&apos;t use &quot;Account Operators&quot; since that&apos;s a domain group.  It appears that members of the Power Users group can maintain accounts, but only the ones that particular user created.   I seem to remember doing this in the NT days, but that was a long time ago. :)&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
The reason is they never created a method of managing content for this box, so I&apos;ve had to come up with some creative ways of giving them access.  They use local box authentication to log in their customers (it&apos;s in the works to change all this, but the server had to go in now), and I don&apos;t want me or my group to have to maintain these accounts.  They set it up wrong, let them do the work.  But, since they&apos;re developers, I don&apos;t want them having admin rights, either.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Anyone?  It&apos;s close to the end of the day and my Google-Fu has reached its limit for the day...</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">post:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.42845</guid>
  	<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2006 12:54:35 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>Spoonman</dc:creator>
	
	<category>users</category>
	
	<category>accounts</category>
	
	<category>management</category>
	
	<category>windows</category>
	
	<category>server</category>
	
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: dcrocha</title>
  	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/42845/How-to-setup-W2K3-to-allow-users-to-manage-user-accounts-without-being-an-admin#658473</link>	
  	<description>Hi,&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I&apos;m no Windows expert anymore, as my last cert was obtained in 2001. &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
If you don&apos;t want to use the &amp;quot;Power Users&amp;quot; group, you&apos;ll probably need to customize the security templates for your box, I think they are located in the Local Computer Policy MMC snap-in. &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Here&apos;s more complete information:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.windowsecurity.com/articles/Understanding-Windows-Security-Templates.html&quot;&gt;http://www.windowsecurity.com/articles/Understanding-Windows-Security-Templates.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/prodtech/windowsserver2003/w2003hg/sgch00.mspx#ETF&quot;&gt;http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/prodtech/windowsserver2003/w2003hg/sgch00.mspx#ETF&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyId=8A2643C1-0685-4D89-B655-521EA6C7B4DB&amp;displaylang=en&quot;&gt;http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyId=8A2643C1-0685-4D89-B655-521EA6C7B4DB&amp;amp;displaylang=en&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
To access the security snap-ins:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Start/Run/mmc&lt;br&gt;
File/Run/Add/Remove snap-in&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I hope it helps!&lt;br&gt;
Daniel</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.42845-658473</guid>
  	<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2006 14:50:52 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>dcrocha</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: Spoonman</title>
  	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/42845/How-to-setup-W2K3-to-allow-users-to-manage-user-accounts-without-being-an-admin#659226</link>	
  	<description>It&apos;s not that I don&apos;t want to, but that I can&apos;t.  There&apos;s going to be more than one &amp;quot;account operator&amp;quot;.  If I use Power Users, each one can only manage accounts it creates.  So, if a person leaves the company, all the accounts they created become unmanageable except by admins.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Since this doesn&apos;t appear to be a policy setting (at least not one that I can find), security templates aren&apos;t the answer either as they only provide you with a way of standardizing local policies.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.42845-659226</guid>
  	<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2006 07:57:00 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>Spoonman</dc:creator>
</item>

    </channel>
</rss>
