<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

      <title>Comments on: The Best Binoculars</title>
      <link>http://ask.metafilter.com/42213/The-Best-Binoculars/</link>
      <description>Comments on Ask MetaFilter post The Best Binoculars</description>
	  	  <pubDate>Sat, 15 Jul 2006 09:18:23 -0800</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Jul 2006 09:18:23 -0800</lastBuildDate>
      <language>en-us</language>
	  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	  <ttl>60</ttl>

<item>
  	<title>Question: The Best Binoculars</title>
  	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/42213/The-Best-Binoculars</link>	
  	<description>What are the best binoculars I can buy for my money? </description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">post:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.42213</guid>
  	<pubDate>Sat, 15 Jul 2006 09:02:03 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>rare_g</dc:creator>
	
	<category>binoculars</category>
	
	<category>birdwatching</category>
	
	<category>stargazing</category>
	
	<category>peeping</category>
	
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: driveler</title>
  	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/42213/The-Best-Binoculars#649413</link>	
  	<description>Your question&apos;s pretty open-ended, but I think for wildlife viewing &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.optics4birding.com/swarovski-binoculars.html&quot;&gt;Swarovski binoculars&lt;/a&gt; are some of the best money can buy.  Be prepared to spend at least $1000 on a pair.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.42213-649413</guid>
  	<pubDate>Sat, 15 Jul 2006 09:18:23 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>driveler</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: deadmessenger</title>
  	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/42213/The-Best-Binoculars#649454</link>	
  	<description>Depends on what you want to do, and how much you want to spend - I own &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.telescope.com/shopping/product/detailmain.jsp?itemID=307&amp;itemType=PRODUCT&amp;iMainCat=5&amp;iSubCat=37&amp;iProductID=307&quot;&gt;this pair&lt;/a&gt; and have been VERY pleased - I use them for terrestrial viewing and binocular astronomy, and you can&apos;t beat the price.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.42213-649454</guid>
  	<pubDate>Sat, 15 Jul 2006 10:14:03 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>deadmessenger</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: Good Brain</title>
  	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/42213/The-Best-Binoculars#649458</link>	
  	<description>Are you saying you want the best value, or that you simply want &amp;quot;the best?&amp;quot;</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.42213-649458</guid>
  	<pubDate>Sat, 15 Jul 2006 10:15:37 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>Good Brain</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: rare_g</title>
  	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/42213/The-Best-Binoculars#649468</link>	
  	<description>Thanks.   Just a general inquiry.... best value and &amp;quot;the best&amp;quot; are both good answers.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.42213-649468</guid>
  	<pubDate>Sat, 15 Jul 2006 10:34:28 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>rare_g</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: Could it be, El Guapo ...</title>
  	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/42213/The-Best-Binoculars#649489</link>	
  	<description>I don&apos;t know anything about binoculars, but I hear that &lt;a href=&quot;http://betterviewdesired.com/&quot;&gt;Better View Desired&lt;/a&gt; is the quintessential reviews site for them.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
From &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.kk.org/cooltools/archives/000549.php&quot;&gt;Cool Tools&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Perhaps the best review site I&apos;ve seen. This guy reviews birding binoculars. He tests them all, very thoroughly, in the field, over time, and he measures each one against his published &amp;quot;standard&amp;quot; pair -- the model to beat so to speak. You get detailed and useful reviews, and a very clear nod towards the binoculars he thinks are the best in several categories. He is as close to that ideal reviewer: an extremely informed friend who has seen them all and can tell you which one to get.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.42213-649489</guid>
  	<pubDate>Sat, 15 Jul 2006 10:59:54 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>Could it be, El Guapo ...</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: StickyCarpet</title>
  	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/42213/The-Best-Binoculars#649507</link>	
  	<description>The ones with widely spread lenses on the image capture end, like the ones deadmessenger links to, give a better 3D effect that can be very vivid. The ones with close together lenses are less immersive, more like a telescope.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.42213-649507</guid>
  	<pubDate>Sat, 15 Jul 2006 11:20:44 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>StickyCarpet</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: caddis</title>
  	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/42213/The-Best-Binoculars#649518</link>	
  	<description>Nikon E-series for my money.  Roof prism binoculars perform equally to porro prism designs but cost far less money.  If the Nikon E is too dear, Swift makes some great binoculars for not too much money.  A &lt;a href=&quot;http://betterviewdesired.com/&quot;&gt;Better View Desired&lt;/a&gt; is perhaps the ultimate binocular review site.  It should have the detailed info for your specific needs.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.42213-649518</guid>
  	<pubDate>Sat, 15 Jul 2006 11:37:28 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>caddis</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: mmdei</title>
  	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/42213/The-Best-Binoculars#649569</link>	
  	<description>I sold binoculars for a year in a high end optics shop.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.optcorp.com/ProductList.aspx?uid=108-110-646-700&quot;&gt;Leica Ultravid or Duovid.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Fantastic service as well. Folks came in with WW II era binoculars and Leica would fix them. No charge.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.42213-649569</guid>
  	<pubDate>Sat, 15 Jul 2006 12:33:08 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>mmdei</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: trevyn</title>
  	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/42213/The-Best-Binoculars#649574</link>	
  	<description>If you want high magnification without a tripod or other mount, the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.usa.canon.com/consumer/controller?act=ProductCatIndexAct&amp;fcategoryid=107&quot;&gt;Canon IS&lt;/a&gt; (Image Stabilizer) series is really quite something.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.42213-649574</guid>
  	<pubDate>Sat, 15 Jul 2006 12:39:07 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>trevyn</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: baylink</title>
  	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/42213/The-Best-Binoculars#649628</link>	
  	<description>I didn&apos;t see anyone mention the Russian military surplus binocs.  They went up to, like, 35x100, I think (bring a tripod), and while they vary in quality, I&apos;ve seen reviews suggesting the best ones are *very* good.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.42213-649628</guid>
  	<pubDate>Sat, 15 Jul 2006 14:03:26 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>baylink</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: orlin</title>
  	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/42213/The-Best-Binoculars#649650</link>	
  	<description>Zeiss -- forget the Swar.&apos;s for the money -- Zeiss is best for hand held.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.42213-649650</guid>
  	<pubDate>Sat, 15 Jul 2006 14:45:43 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>orlin</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: vronsky</title>
  	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/42213/The-Best-Binoculars#649888</link>	
  	<description>One word - Leica.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.42213-649888</guid>
  	<pubDate>Sat, 15 Jul 2006 21:17:24 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>vronsky</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: mcstayinskool</title>
  	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/42213/The-Best-Binoculars#649899</link>	
  	<description>before you bend to the will of the ziess/leica/swarovski optic elite, please go to a store that sells the Canon Image Stabilizing line of binoculars and demo a pair. Just give &apos;em a shot.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
My biggest problem with binoculars is shaky hands, and with IS in place it is freakin&apos; crazy what you can see. This summer I watched a Cooper&apos;s Hawk dismember a Blue Jay, and I could see it&apos;s eyeball looking up at me periodically while it chowed down. The optics are also really impressive on these. I have the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.usa.canon.com/consumer/controller?act=ModelDetailAct&amp;fcategoryid=128&amp;modelid=7375&quot;&gt;10x30s&lt;/a&gt;, and they cost me between $300 and $400 as I recall.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.42213-649899</guid>
  	<pubDate>Sat, 15 Jul 2006 21:39:10 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>mcstayinskool</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: vronsky</title>
  	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/42213/The-Best-Binoculars#649944</link>	
  	<description>The Canons are fantastic too. My dad owns them and they are fantastic. But the poster asked for the best. Nothing beats the image quality of the leica, but I would definitely buy the canons. Probably a better value.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.42213-649944</guid>
  	<pubDate>Sat, 15 Jul 2006 23:10:59 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>vronsky</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: mmdei</title>
  	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/42213/The-Best-Binoculars#649965</link>	
  	<description>The best price/optics out there are the Konica-Minolta WPXL.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.42213-649965</guid>
  	<pubDate>Sun, 16 Jul 2006 00:11:41 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>mmdei</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: vronsky</title>
  	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/42213/The-Best-Binoculars#650096</link>	
  	<description>I had a small pair of leica trinovids stolen out of my luggage at an airport. It still pisses me off that I was so stupid not to put them in my carry-on.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
And I had heard that about leica service too mmdei, nice to hear it confirmed.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.42213-650096</guid>
  	<pubDate>Sun, 16 Jul 2006 08:14:49 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>vronsky</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: caddis</title>
  	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/42213/The-Best-Binoculars#650246</link>	
  	<description>Just to be clear, my comment above about Nikon E series and Swifts goes to best value.  The E series hang with Leicas, Zeiss, and Swarovskis, but at about half the price because they are roof prisms.  I have a pair of the Es that perform exceptionally well and have lasted me now fifteen years.  Still, for a cost no object pair I would probably get top of the line Leicas, although these &lt;a href=&quot;http://betterviewdesired.com/12-05/Zeiss%208x42TFL.html&quot;&gt;Zeiss Victorys&lt;/a&gt; look pretty choice.  They probably only minimally edge out the Nikon&apos;s glass, but are perhaps more rugged and have an excellent feel to them.  When you use them a lot, these little things matter.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.42213-650246</guid>
  	<pubDate>Sun, 16 Jul 2006 13:46:01 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>caddis</dc:creator>
</item>

    </channel>
</rss>
