Comments on: help find the name of this Japanese beauty

Question: help find the name of this Japanese beauty

unrequited — Thu, 08 Jun 2006 22:36:49 -0800

I'm looking for who this model is... although these pics are PG-13 (a couple upskirts), they're still probably NSFW. They're not "porn" so I guess it's okay. I've tried a bunch of friends, and well, people I know who would be into this sort of stuff, but I'm still stumped. Here's a collection of the pictures I have along with their original filename as given to me.

By: jgee

jgee — Thu, 08 Jun 2006 22:40:58 -0800

Strange I know this, but i found out from the Metatalk discussion about Myspace yesterday that it is Sayaka Isoyama.

By: unrequited

unrequited — Thu, 08 Jun 2006 22:48:20 -0800

Unfortunately, it's not her, Isoyama has a mole on her left cheek and this mystery girl has one above her lip on the right. Thanks for yet another beautiful Japanese girl though hah.

By: jgee

jgee — Thu, 08 Jun 2006 22:50:46 -0800

oops, you are right. Didn't look close enough.

By: evariste

evariste — Thu, 08 Jun 2006 23:52:59 -0800

Well, that's certainly a strange way to acquire my IP address.

By: evariste

evariste — Thu, 08 Jun 2006 23:53:06 -0800

...but it worked.

By: unrequited

unrequited — Thu, 08 Jun 2006 23:56:12 -0800

Hah, I swear I'm not in it for ip logging. Feel free to use an anonymizer if it helps me know who this model is... > )

By: evariste

evariste — Thu, 08 Jun 2006 23:59:25 -0800

Yeah, I was being facetious :-) Sorry I can't help about the identity of the girl. She's hot!

By: evariste

evariste — Fri, 09 Jun 2006 00:09:42 -0800

No EXIF data, or much else to figure out where they came from. Where did you find these?

olivia:~$ identify -verbose t16.jpg 

t16.jpg JPEG 591x739 DirectClass 73kb 

Image: t16.jpg

  Format: JPEG (Joint Photographic Experts Group JFIF format)

  Geometry: 591x739

  Class: DirectClass

  Type: TrueColor

  Endianess: Undefined

  Colorspace: RGB

  Channel depth:

    Red: 8-bits

    Green: 8-bits

    Blue: 8-bits

  Channel statistics:

    Red:

      Min: 0 (0)

      Max: 255 (1)

      Mean: 117.539 (0.460936)

      Standard deviation: 84.0163 (0.329476)

    Green:

      Min: 0 (0)

      Max: 255 (1)

      Mean: 111.774 (0.438331)

      Standard deviation: 78.0144 (0.305939)

    Blue:

      Min: 0 (0)

      Max: 255 (1)

      Mean: 131.56 (0.515923)

      Standard deviation: 76.3417 (0.299379)

  Colors: 81215

  Rendering-intent: Undefined

  Resolution: 72x72

  Units: PixelsPerInch

  Filesize: 73kb

  Interlace: None

  Background Color: white

  Border Color: #DFDFDF

  Matte Color: grey74

  Dispose: Undefined

  Iterations: 0

  Compression: JPEG

  Quality: 75

  Orientation: Undefined

  JPEG-Colorspace: 2

  JPEG-Sampling-factors: 2x2,1x1,1x1

  Signature: 789a3341e44f305c8f6dee4c9307648210621f127227ed044a01231629c7cbae

  Tainted: False

  Version: ImageMagick 6.2.4 02/13/06 Q16 http://www.imagemagick.org

olivia:~$ identify -format "%[EXIF:*]" t16.jpg 



olivia:~$

By: moochoo

moochoo — Fri, 09 Jun 2006 00:10:47 -0800

might be worth asking over at empornium.us

By: unrequited

unrequited — Fri, 09 Jun 2006 00:13:14 -0800

>evariste my friend gave them to me, and he forgot where he got them from, or who it was from... so useless.

By: aeighty

aeighty — Fri, 09 Jun 2006 00:43:32 -0800

might be worth asking over at empornium.us

or finklses forums.

By: GeekAnimator

GeekAnimator — Fri, 09 Jun 2006 07:01:06 -0800

There's a bunch of photobooks posted up on puretna.com right now. I'd try going through those. (I'd help ya out, but I'm at work).

By: Lazlo Hollyfeld

Lazlo Hollyfeld — Fri, 09 Jun 2006 07:07:25 -0800

I imagine there are still active usenet groups that could probably help you with this (not that I would know anything about that *cough* *cough*).

By: trevyn

trevyn — Fri, 09 Jun 2006 10:45:04 -0800

CRC checked against the last 3 years or so of usenet, no matches.

By: evariste

evariste — Fri, 09 Jun 2006 13:00:52 -0800

trevyn-intriguing, but you got me all sorts of curious. Did you mime-encode before CRC'ing? Is this something that's worked for you before? I wouldn't have thought to do that, even if I had 3 years' worth of usenet sitting on a hard drive somewhere (how?!)

By: trevyn

trevyn — Fri, 09 Jun 2006 13:19:56 -0800

evariste, I happen to have access to CRCs et al. for decoded JPEGs (~47 million unique), which is what I checked against--so if they were posted UUencoded, MIME, or yEnc, it would come up. Obviously, this doesn't help if the image has been cropped, had a text overlay added, or the binary has otherwise been altered, but it's a data point.

You can, of course, do fancier things with fuzzy image comparison that will catch those things, but that's out of my realm.

BTW, The sheer quantities of this type of shoot that are out there lead me to believe that looking through Japanese pseudo-porn yourself will be pointless for identification purposes. ;)

By: evariste

evariste — Fri, 09 Jun 2006 14:08:20 -0800

trevyn-interesting, thanks. For what purpose were CRCs made of that much of the Usenet?

By: trevyn

trevyn — Fri, 09 Jun 2006 14:09:51 -0800

NSA monitoring, of course! ;) ;)

By: evariste

evariste — Fri, 09 Jun 2006 14:11:36 -0800

Hah!

By: unrequited

unrequited — Fri, 09 Jun 2006 14:24:43 -0800

That makes me kind of scared trevyn... But thanks anyways.

By: AmbroseChapel

AmbroseChapel — Fri, 09 Jun 2006 14:33:01 -0800

Maybe it's just me, but when files are created by ImageMagick and start with the letter "T" aren't they likely to be thumbnails? In which case, although they're pretty big for thumbnails, aren't there somewhere some much bigger originals?

Maybe that's why you couldn't find them.