<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

      <title>Comments on: Mac Backup sucks, but does it work?</title>
      <link>http://ask.metafilter.com/38037/Mac-Backup-sucks-but-does-it-work/</link>
      <description>Comments on Ask MetaFilter post Mac Backup sucks, but does it work?</description>
	  	  <pubDate>Fri, 12 May 2006 00:48:21 -0800</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 May 2006 00:48:21 -0800</lastBuildDate>
      <language>en-us</language>
	  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	  <ttl>60</ttl>

<item>
  	<title>Question: Mac Backup sucks, but does it work?</title>
  	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/38037/Mac-Backup-sucks-but-does-it-work</link>	
  	<description>Let it be known, first, that I devoured past posts on &lt;a href=&quot;http://ask.metafilter.com/tags/mac+Backup&quot;&gt;Macs and backup tools&lt;/a&gt;, and see a lot of things I want to try.  However, I used Apple&apos;s own &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.apple.com/dotmac/backup.html&quot;&gt;Mac Backup 3&lt;/a&gt; application (a .Mac tool) prior to learning here that it sucks. So, for those who have also similarly (if inexplicably) used Mac Backup, I have a question.  How do I know if it worked? &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; I started Mac Backup. I created a custom plan so I could do a one-time full backup of a folder on my Mac filled with 10,000+ photos to DVDs.  I said &quot;Make backup now.&quot;  It did its little dance, and said it would take 37 or something CDs, or 4 DVDs.  Then, I followed the instructions as it burned the first one, told me to label it, burned the second one, told me to label it, and so on.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
But after the third DVD, it reported it was done with that disc (as before), but didn&apos;t ask for that fourth disc.  And the history simply showed &quot;backup completed successfully.&quot;  So, did it?  Did it just overestimate that it needed four DVDs?  Or did I somehow skip it or break something?  Immediately after using Backup, my Mac didn&apos;t recognize a blank DVD I inserted until after a few tries.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I would&apos;ve thought that putting one of the burned DVDs into my Mac would helpfully say, &quot;Disc 1 of 3&quot; or something.  But there&apos;s simply &quot;Disc 1.&quot;  So I can&apos;t tell how many DVDs Backup &lt;i&gt;thinks&lt;/i&gt; the plan includes.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Any ideas?  Besides, &quot;Don&apos;t use Mac Backup&quot;?  I&apos;ll probably use another utility or go with external Firewire drives, ultimately, but I want to know if these DVDs I made are any good!  Thanks in advance.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">post:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.38037</guid>
  	<pubDate>Fri, 12 May 2006 00:37:16 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>pzarquon</dc:creator>
	
	<category>mac</category>
	
	<category>osx</category>
	
	<category>backup</category>
	
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: tellurian</title>
  	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/38037/Mac-Backup-sucks-but-does-it-work#588748</link>	
  	<description>Try to do a restore (you can restore an individual file to a different loaction if you want). I use Backup to an external drive and have restored files successfully.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.38037-588748</guid>
  	<pubDate>Fri, 12 May 2006 00:48:21 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>tellurian</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: jack_mo</title>
  	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/38037/Mac-Backup-sucks-but-does-it-work#588772</link>	
  	<description>Yep, as far as I know attempting a restore is the only way to tell.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
For what it&apos;s worth, I&apos;ve always found Backup completely reliable - it&apos;s saved my bacon twice, once after a fried logic board, and again after spectacularly careless use of the rm command. That said, I now use SuperDuper, with Backup as my backup backup, so to speak.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.38037-588772</guid>
  	<pubDate>Fri, 12 May 2006 02:58:53 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>jack_mo</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: lowlife</title>
  	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/38037/Mac-Backup-sucks-but-does-it-work#588823</link>	
  	<description>My understanding (via &lt;a href=&quot;http://daringfireball.net/&quot;&gt;John Gruber&lt;/a&gt;) is that the only backup software worth using on a Mac is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.shirt-pocket.com/SuperDuper/SuperDuperDescription.html&quot;&gt;SuperDuper&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
There was a &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.plasticsfuture.org/2006/04/23/mac-backup-software-harmful/ &quot;&gt;pretty comprehensive review&lt;/a&gt; of all the major Mac backup software recently. Surprisingly, it didn&apos;t cover .Mac backup. However, there are currently bugs in the &apos;asr&apos; command, so that may have a negative effect on .Mac backup (but I&apos;m only speculating).</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.38037-588823</guid>
  	<pubDate>Fri, 12 May 2006 05:51:31 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>lowlife</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: tellurian</title>
  	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/38037/Mac-Backup-sucks-but-does-it-work#588831</link>	
  	<description>&lt;i&gt;spectacularly careless use of the rm command&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;
*breaks out in a sweat after pressing return*</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.38037-588831</guid>
  	<pubDate>Fri, 12 May 2006 06:01:55 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>tellurian</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: joeblough</title>
  	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/38037/Mac-Backup-sucks-but-does-it-work#588970</link>	
  	<description>in your shell defaults file, (~/.cshrc, ~/.profile, etc.) you should alias rm to &apos;rm -i&apos;, so at least it asks you if you really want to delete the file. if you are convinced you want to delete something, you can always type /bin/rm foo instead of just &apos;rm&apos; and it will bypass the alias.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.38037-588970</guid>
  	<pubDate>Fri, 12 May 2006 08:20:05 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>joeblough</dc:creator>
</item>

    </channel>
</rss>
